On 9/28/2016 5:46 PM, Anton Shepelev wrote:
Hello, all
We are migrating to SVN from the dreaded SourceSafe
and should like to retain, if only at the start, the
exclusive check-out process, with the following
*atomic* operations which should be performed as
easily as possible:
1. l
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:12:28AM -0700, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> On 09/27/2016 01:46 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 13:04:04 +0200:
> > > Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't understand why 'svn diff
> > > --old=TRUNK --new=BRANCH' would show you thin
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Anton Shepelev
wrote:
> Hello, all
>
> We are migrating to SVN from the dreaded SourceSafe
> and should like to retain, if only at the start, the
> exclusive check-out process, with the following
> *atomic* operations which should be performed as
> easi
Hi Anton,
On 9/28/16 8:46 AM, Anton Shepelev wrote:
Hello, all
We are migrating to SVN from the dreaded SourceSafe
and should like to retain, if only at the start, the
exclusive check-out process, with the following
*atomic* operations which should be performed as
easily as possible:
Hello, all
We are migrating to SVN from the dreaded SourceSafe
and should like to retain, if only at the start, the
exclusive check-out process, with the following
*atomic* operations which should be performed as
easily as possible:
1. lock and update,
lest one might accident
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 19:44:07 -0400:
> If you switch the upstream repo for a software source repo, recompile.
> It's the best way to make sure you've not left some datestamped file
> inconsistencies that could mess with the system.
Subversion supports both the "recompile
