Re: Protected/secure SVN

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:30 AM, D Ste wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to set up SVN to store confidential documents. > I have secured the pipe communication with HTTPS/SSL. To avoid unauthorized > users (even with root access) accessing documents from within the server, I > would like to protect t

Re: Checkout/Update issues with Subversion 1.8 server and client via HTTP

Hello, On 12/05/15 18:27, Clay Porter wrote: > svn: E175002: GET request failed: 400 Bad request > There is no corresponding error in the Apache HTTP logs. > > svn: E200014: Checksum mismatch for >expected: 4b4ef9e3432aa84aed190457b68c01ad > actual: 863b9f52f352a5cb20298ef0eecb9e97 >

RE: Protected/secure SVN

If a user has root access to your host then nothing is going to be completely secure on that host. The encryption key could potentially be read from memory or the resulting decrypted repository contents from memory. If you don't trust your root users then you've got bigger problems regarding t

Checkout/Update issues with Subversion 1.8 server and client via HTTP

We recently upgraded our Subversion server from 1.6 to 1.8 and since then some of our users our reporting problems checking out certain folders using a 1.8 client. The issues occur whether using TortoiseSVN 1.8.x or any 1.8 CLI client on Windows/Cygwin/Linux. We have verified that these operatio

Re: Protected/secure SVN

> On May 12, 2015, at 8:45 AM, jbl...@icloud.com wrote: > > >> On May 12, 2015, at 5:30 AM, D Ste wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to set up SVN to store confidential documents. >> I have secured the pipe communication with HTTPS/SSL. To avoid unauthorized >> users (even with root acces

Re: Protected/secure SVN

> On May 12, 2015, at 5:30 AM, D Ste wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to set up SVN to store confidential documents. > I have secured the pipe communication with HTTPS/SSL. To avoid unauthorized > users (even with root access) accessing documents from within the server, I > would like to pr

Can someone please verfiy this "svn -v st" behaviour with file externals?

Hi all, can someone please check if this realy is a regression, or if it is just me doing something wrong. I have a problem with "svn -v status" showing an unexpected result for file externals. This seems to be a regression that happended with svn 1.8.12/13 I've tried this with the binaries bu

Protected/secure SVN

Hi, I would like to set up SVN to store confidential documents. I have secured the pipe communication with HTTPS/SSL. To avoid unauthorized users (even with root access) accessing documents from within the server, I would like to protect the SVN linux folder/files with encryption. Are there any

Re: Error checking out project that contains a large amount of binary data

I looked it up and it doesn't give me any leads: #define ECONNABORTED103 /* Software caused connection abort */ Any other ideas? On 11/05/2015 10:29 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Timothy Astle wrote on Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:16:25 -0300: Error writing base64 data. Software caused

test posting via gmane nntp

sorry (again) about the noise. That's the last one, promised 8-)

testing posting to subversion user via gmane

sorry for the noice