On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Mohsin wrote:
> Thanks all for your reply i'll try with svn mv command and get back to you if
> face any issue.
>
>
> Mohsin
There are a number of underlying reasons for this. It's partly that
the "mv" command isn't really a "mv", it's a "copy, then delete the
old
On 02/20/15 10:21, Philip Martin wrote:
You are making things very hard for yourself by running 1.6.11, it is
very old and no longer maintained, unless your distribution is
backporting fixes. A newer version will have fewer bugs and better
performance.
You'll get no disagreement from me on tha