Limit The size of Commit in SVN

2014-01-21 Thread Mehboob Ahmed
Dear All, Is ther any hook who wont allow user to commit in SVN whose size is greater than 1GB.it means i want to restrict user to commit less than 1GB of data in SVN. i need this hook in windows format .bat file extention please help. Regards Mehboob Ahmed

Re: upgrade to subversion 1.8.5 suspected bug

2014-01-21 Thread Austin Mico
I added the line RemoveType .php for the subversion conf and it is working now. Thank you very much to all. On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Ben Reser wrote: > On 1/21/14, 9:43 PM, Austin Mico wrote: > > AddType text/html .php > > Ryan is entirely right. > > This is your problem. Add this t

Encrypted passwd on Debian, SVN-Server

2014-01-21 Thread Anselm Arndt
Hey guys, I am trying to store the passwords encrypted in the "passwd". The gnome-keyring package could be used for everyone who is using a svn-client, but I want to store the passwords on the server encrypted. Could you give me a hint or a link were I can find a prober solution. My passwords a

Re: upgrade to subversion 1.8.5 suspected bug

2014-01-21 Thread Ben Reser
On 1/21/14, 9:43 PM, Austin Mico wrote: > AddType text/html .php Ryan is entirely right. This is your problem. Add this to your Location for svn: RemoveType .php Or simply move the AddType inside some block a block probably makes the most sense. Since blocks will never match against SVN serv

Re: upgrade to subversion 1.8.5 suspected bug

2014-01-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 22, 2014, at 00:26, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Jan 20, 2014, at 23:04, Austin Mico wrote: > >> If you have this code below which can be viewed exactly like this on browser >> on version 1.8.4 >> > >> // Define path to application directory >> defined('APPLICATION_PATH') >>|| define('A

Re: upgrade to subversion 1.8.5 suspected bug

2014-01-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 20, 2014, at 23:04, Austin Mico wrote: > If you have this code below which can be viewed exactly like this on browser > on version 1.8.4 > > // Define path to application directory > defined('APPLICATION_PATH') > || define('APPLICATION_PATH', realpath(dirname(__FILE__) . > '/../app

Re: upgrade to subversion 1.8.5 suspected bug

2014-01-21 Thread Austin Mico
Here is the php conf: # # PHP is an HTML-embedded scripting language which attempts to make it # easy for developers to write dynamically generated webpages. # LoadModule php5_module modules/libphp5.so LoadModule php5_module modules/libphp5-zts.so # # Cause the PHP interpreter to handle

Re: upgrade to subversion 1.8.5 suspected bug

2014-01-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Ben Reser wrote: > This is a side effect of the change to setting the filename entry in the > request record with 1.8.5. See the 2nd yellow box here: > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.8.html#mod_dav_svn-fsmap > > I'd guess you have some sort of

Re: upgrade to subversion 1.8.5 suspected bug

2014-01-21 Thread Ben Reser
On 1/20/14, 9:04 PM, Austin Mico wrote: > If you have this code below which can be viewed exactly like this on browser > on > version 1.8.4 > > > // Define path to application directory > defined('APPLICATION_PATH') > || define('APPLICATION_PATH', realpath(dirname(__FILE__) . > '/../applic

Re: upgrade to subversion 1.8.5 suspected bug

2014-01-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Do you have another web server running on port 80? And does the WanDisco server tweak the standard "httpd" package's configuration, or does it install another fully equipped "httpd"? You should be able to run tools like "netstat" and "lsof" to see what has the port open. On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1

Disjoint working copy

2014-01-21 Thread Ræstad Atle Eivind
Hi Is there a way to get full status information for a disjoint working copy without performing "svn st" on each sub working copies? And without the use of external definition? Example: setenv p `pwd` svnadmin create r svn -m "" mkdir file:///$p/r/common file:///$p/r/common/module1 file:///$p/

Re: Cryptographic hash computations for a revision range on the repository side

2014-01-21 Thread Thierry Moreau
And what's the difference to your proposed solution? Basically, the differences are that a) one has to control paper sheet(s) instead of a private signature key data value and computing environment, and b) this control is about integrity only, no need for long-term private signature key secr

Re: Cryptographic hash computations for a revision range on the repository side

2014-01-21 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Thierry Moreau, am Dienstag, 21. Januar 2014 um 05:11 schrieben Sie: > Digital signatures require public/private key protections, just shifting > the problem to yet another security challenge. And what's the difference to your proposed solution? You are simply re-inventing signatures wi