On 8/21/13 12:27 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> Okay that isn't a duplicate. The fix for PR 55304 removed the check
> for the parent of the copy but not the check for the locks. That's
> going to be a lot messier of a fix.
Turns out it wasn't so bad of a fix, but it took some studying of the RFC to
fi
> Am 10.09.2013 19:45, schrieb Thomas Harold:
>
> > When we moved from a monolithic repository to per-client repositories
> > a few years ago, we went ahead and:
> >
> > - Rebased the paths up one or two levels (old system was something
> > like "monolithicrepo/[a-z]/[client directories]/[job dire
Am 10.09.2013 19:45, schrieb Thomas Harold:
When we moved from a monolithic repository to per-client repositories a
few years ago, we went ahead and:
- Rebased the paths up one or two levels (old system was something like
"monolithicrepo/[a-z]/[client directories]/[job directory]") so that the
Hello Pavel,
Any update on this issue as the bug still exists?
From: Dinesh Hirani
Sent: 04 July 2013 16:30
To: 'Pavel Lyalyakin'; users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: RE: Subversion 1.8 httpd.exe taking 100% CPU
Hello Pavel,
Answer is in red below
-Original Message-
From: Pavel L
Hi,
I performed a Checkout on windows to the root of a drive and received a
sequence of exceptions. Workaround was to make a folder for the working copy.
===
---
Subversion Exception!
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:25:20PM -0400, Sam Khan wrote:
> Hi,
> There's online code that's being copied by others.
> https://subversion.assembla.com/svn/cs4410-als364/
> Is it possible you can remove the code for CS 4410 project MP1,MP2,MP3,MP4
>
> Thanks,
> Sam
Hi Sam,
I'm afraid you're writi
