On Sep 13, 2012, at 08:23, John Maher wrote:
> How hard is it to change the book? I know what it means now, but the
> next person may get confused. I would bet that someone will eventually
> get confused. If it said "repository tree" like the FAQ I would bet it
> helps.
Book feedback should b
Guten Tag John Maher,
am Donnerstag, 13. September 2012 um 16:26 schrieben Sie:
> Yes that is what I did. Now that I know that causes problems with the
> subversion mailing list I won't do it again.
It causes problems on nearly every mailing list as they each work
similar. The first mail you sen
On 13/09/12 15:26, John Maher wrote:
Yes that is what I did. Now that I know that causes problems with the
subversion mailing list I won't do it again.
John
Thank you
Giulio
Yes that is what I did. Now that I know that causes problems with the
subversion mailing list I won't do it again.
John
-Original Message-
From: Giulio Troccoli [mailto:giulio.trocc...@mediatelgroup.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:25 AM
To: John Maher
Cc: users@subversion.a
On 13/09/12 15:15, John Maher wrote:
Can you tell me what that means? I had a question on merging so I sent
it to the mailing list. Are you saying I'm not supposed to do that? If
not then can you explain the procedure?
You are hijacking someone else's email. Presumably you have clicked on
Can you tell me what that means? I had a question on merging so I sent
it to the mailing list. Are you saying I'm not supposed to do that? If
not then can you explain the procedure?
John
-Original Message-
From: Giulio Troccoli [mailto:giulio.trocc...@mediatelgroup.co.uk]
Sent: Thursd
Guten Tag John Maher,
am Donnerstag, 13. September 2012 um 15:35 schrieben Sie:
> In reality we should've had code control a long time ago. I only
> got here a few years ago. And when I first got here I met extreme
> resistance about incorporating something like subversion. I finally
> got the
Thanks Thorsten.
While its true that I didn't technically lose code, it was probably in there
somewhere. The loss was discovered weeks later and we have a lot of code. It
would take days going over everything then we would have to *hope* we got
everything. Some things would let us know if we
Thanks Stefan.
I did read most of the links. I didn't know about the FAQ, thanks.
Your statement was key:
"Note that the "tree" being talked about there is not an individual
branch, but all nodes in the repository, including the /trunk directory
and the /branches/feature directory."
Basically
> /data/cvs/tusk/ocw/tmpl/Attic/header,v
> Processed 5345 files
> Pass 1 complete.
> ==
> =
> Error summary:
> ERROR: '/var/www/cvs/module/badfile,v' is not a valid ,v file
>
> Has anyone had fun and experience with CVS files
On 12/09/12 18:39, John Maher wrote:
Hello
[CUT]
Can you please stop reusing an already existing thread and instead start
a new one for a new question?
Thanks
John
Thanks
Giulio
Dear Users,
We're having around 40 repositories.
I'm trying to limit write access to a specific group per repository and
all read access to a group. How can i achieve this?
I was able to limit the write operations with:
Require ldap-group CN=svn-repo-install-read
But how can i
On 09/13/2012 12:30 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> I'm helping upgrade a 12 year old CVS repository to use modern source
> control, and have run into a bit of a surprise. Running either cvs2svn
> or cvs2git, I'm finding a couple of old CVS files that were hand
> edited, 6 hears, and cause cvs2svn t
13 matches
Mail list logo
