On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>>> Pretty much everything you can do with subversion will work with a
>>> local repository and file:/// references. Do your initial
>>> testing/learning that way, then decide wh
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> Pretty much everything you can do with subversion will work with a
>> local repository and file:/// references. Do your initial
>> testing/learning that way, then decide what OS platform you want for
>> your server. I'd recommend a
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Pietro Moras wrote:
>> In need of breaking the initial ice with Subversion, I wonder if you have
>> any real knowledge of a Test Subversion Repository/Server where to start
>> understanding, hands-on, what it
The recent versions of RHEL 6 and Fedora install KDE as distinct kde3
or kde4 setups in /usr/include/{kde3,kde4} and
/usr/lib[64]/{kde3,kde4}/devel. The result confuses the
build/ac-macros/kwallet.m4 macros. While splitting the "kde_dir" test
into separate tests for "kde4--config --path include" a
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 01:40:11PM -0700, Geoff Hoffman wrote:
> Sort of off topic of this thread, but even though I've used SVN for years,
> the idea of running it locally without a server never occurred to me. I
> thought 'distributed repositories' was Git's only/main benefit over SVN,
> but if y
Try this on a Unix-like system:
cd ~
svnadmin create /myrepo
svn checkout file:///myrepo
When you're done playing,
rm -rf /myrepo
rm -rf ~/myrepo
- Original Message -
From: Les Mikesell
Sent: 10/30/11 04:03 AM
To: Pietro Moras
Subject: Re: Where/How to get a Test Subversion Server
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> There is no need to set up a server to try out Subversion.
>
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Les Mikesell
wrote:
>
> Pretty much everything you can do with subversion will work with a
> local repository and file:/// references. Do
Ryan,
First of all, let me offer my sincerest gratitude. Your latest email made
very clear the "error of my ways". I thought the /format folder lived in
the source folder with the /trunk, /branches, /tag folders. You now cleared
it up for me that the /format folder lives under the repository on
>> In need of breaking the
>> initial ice with Subversion, I wonder if you have any real knowledge
>> of a Test Subversion Repository/Server where to start understanding,
>> hands-on, what it's all about.
>
> There is no need to set up a server to try out Subversion.
>
> Install TortoiseSVN 1.7.1.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Pietro Moras wrote:
> In need of breaking the initial ice with Subversion, I wonder if you have
> any real knowledge of a Test Subversion Repository/Server where to start
> understanding, hands-on, what it's all about.
>
> Anyhow, these are the related generic—and
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 05:07:13PM +, Pietro Moras wrote:
> In need of breaking the
> initial ice with Subversion, I wonder if you have any real knowledge
> of a Test Subversion Repository/Server where to start understanding,
> hands-on, what it's all about.
>
> Anyhow, these are the related g
In need of breaking the
initial ice with Subversion, I wonder if you have any real knowledge
of a Test Subversion Repository/Server where to start understanding,
hands-on, what it's all about.
Anyhow, these are the related generic—and, so far, untested—hints I've already
collected: -- Redbe
Thanks, Stefan!
I'm noticing a KWallet software detection bug, My test setup is RHEL
5, which doesn't have a recent enough KDE to support KWallet, so the
.spec file works there. It *won't* work for current Fedora releases or
RHEL 6, because the KWallet description causes "./configure
--with-kwalle
Please Reply All so this discussion stays on the mailing list.
On Oct 29, 2011, at 03:09, Bruce Vining wrote:
> Thx for the quick response. What is the layout of the "format" file. Is it
> part of the SVN system or is this a file I create for each of my repositories?
>
> Thx again for the 41
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:32:52PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> For various reasons, I've been working on RPM packaging of 1.7.0 and
> now 1.7.1. I'd like to get the old "packages/rpm" structure replaced
> with it, and I'm trying to get it into RPMforge. It's built from the
> Fedora packaging
15 matches
Mail list logo
