On 13.10.2011 22:31, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Oct 13, 2011, at 06:51, Andrey Paramonov wrote:
I believe Subversion can automagically translate line ending sequences when
transferring data to and from server. I use Windows, so I have CRLF sequences
at the ends of the lines in my working copy. Th
Thanks for your ACK.
Any hint?
Cheers,
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Schmidt [mailto:subversion-20...@ryandesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 2:35 PM
To: Waseem Shahzad
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Export files from Tortoise SVN
On Oct 13, 2011, at 01:59, W
Hi all. I'm trying to build svn 1.7.0 on a Solaris 9 box, using gcc v
4.1.1. I've already downloaded and built APR and APR-UTIL, and am passing
their install directories to the configure command using --with-apr and
--with-apr-util. They seemed to compile and install without an error.
When I ru
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>Lorenz wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:22:30 +:
>> [...]
>> anyways, I just read elsethread that dumpfilter does not work with the
>> dump format version that 1.7 uses.
>
>You misunderstood.
>
>svndumpfilter does not work with format 3 dumpfiles, produced by
>svnrdump and
Hi,
developing an application dealing with many repositories the existence
of paths within that repositories had to be checked.
Using something like:
my $repos = SVN::Repos::open($localpath) or die "no such repo";
my $fs= $repos->fs;
$ispath =
$repos->fs->revision_root( $f
Is there a short-hand for listing eligible revisions in a mergeinfo query?
To avoid expensive (sometimes several minutes on <1.7) empty merge
calls, it is handy to find out whether merge would actually do
anything - the current command-line is pretty verbose for the task
though (needless to say I'
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote:
>> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just switch
>> the containing working copy when you're in a sub-folder of it?
>
> See http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-201
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote:
> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just switch
> the containing working copy when you're in a sub-folder of it?
See http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2011-10/0134.shtml
Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just switch
the containing working copy when you're in a sub-folder of it?
If my current folder is c:\work\foo\bar and my working copy is rooted
at c:\work\foo I can't just 'svn relocate MIRROR_PREFIX
MASTER_PREFIX'.
Oh no, instead svn te
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 05:02:16PM -0700, Mike Dixon wrote:
> PS. It seems kind of unfortunate that stack traces aren't included
> in the reports. I'd guess that that would help you figure out what's
> going on better than relying on users to put in a useful text
> description about what they were
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 05:55:20PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > The project has decided long ago to filter problem reports on the
> > users mailing list. There are several reasons for this.
> > See the big yellow box at http://subversion.
On 10/13/2011 3:55 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Isn't there a better place to recommend sending the error report than
a user's mail list?
The project has decided long ago to filter problem reports on the
users mailing list. There are several reasons for this.
See the big yellow box at http://subvers
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>
>> > We've been getting this report a lot lately.
>> > Maybe it's time to add this to the FAQ?
>> >
>> > I also think we should change the assert into a proper error message.
>> >
>>
>> Isn't there a better place to recommend sending the e
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 04:50:45PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >
> > We've been getting this report a lot lately.
> > Maybe it's time to add this to the FAQ?
> >
> > I also think we should change the assert into a proper error message.
>
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> We've been getting this report a lot lately.
> Maybe it's time to add this to the FAQ?
>
> I also think we should change the assert into a proper error message.
>
Isn't there a better place to recommend sending the error report than
a u
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:15:04AM +1300, Talden wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Ryan Schmidt
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Oct 12, 2011, at 16:35, Talden wrote:
>> >
>> >> Is anyone aware of an alternative to svnprops.py (or an updat
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:15:04AM +1300, Talden wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Ryan Schmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 12, 2011, at 16:35, Talden wrote:
> >
> >> Is anyone aware of an alternative to svnprops.py (or an updated
> >> version) that works with Subversion 1.7 (and on Windows)?
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
>
> On Oct 12, 2011, at 16:35, Talden wrote:
>
>> Is anyone aware of an alternative to svnprops.py (or an updated
>> version) that works with Subversion 1.7 (and on Windows)?
>
> svnprops.py doesn't work with 1.7? What happens?
The version I ha
On Oct 13, 2011, at 10:58, Nrupen Kantamneni wrote:
> I am planning to have subversion deployed as a version control tool and would
> like few suggestions and clarifications on the same
> Does subversion support the server replication method meaning the backup
> server will be up and running wit
On Oct 12, 2011, at 16:35, Talden wrote:
> Is anyone aware of an alternative to svnprops.py (or an updated
> version) that works with Subversion 1.7 (and on Windows)?
svnprops.py doesn't work with 1.7? What happens?
On Oct 13, 2011, at 01:59, Waseem Shahzad wrote:
> I am trying to get the only changed files in the revision. I am using this ..
>
> svn export -r 2 "svnrepository" destination
>
> This command Is getting all the files including changed files.
> Below concept is good for me but it doesn’t e
On Oct 13, 2011, at 06:51, Andrey Paramonov wrote:
>>> I believe Subversion can automagically translate line ending sequences when
>>> transferring data to and from server. I use Windows, so I have CRLF
>>> sequences at the ends of the lines in my working copy. The question is:
>>> what is the
In the commit dialog I noticed a file I wanted to revert back. When I clicked
Revert I got the following error message. I'm running 64bit of Tortoise SVN
under Windows 7 64bit. Also running the cleanup on the folder showed the same
error message.
---
Subversion Excep
Lorenz wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:22:30 +:
> wrote:
> >Thanks for your reply. Do you know if I need to have both SVN 1.7
> >on the client and server side, or is just enough with the client?
>
> I don't think so
>
> anyways, I just read elsethread that dumpfilter does not work with the
>>> So now we want to see the nodes row for each of those four paths:
>>>
>>> sqlite3 .svn/wc.db "select * from nodes where
>>> local_relpath='X/MONSTER.FMX/MONSTER.FMX.csproj'"
>>> sqlite3 .svn/wc.db "select * from nodes where
>>> local_relpath='X/MONSTER.FMX/Boxes/gbFMXDisplay.resx'"
>>> sqlite
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:37:35 +, David Scherr wrote:
...
> with as much information as possible about what
> you were trying to do.
> But please first search the mailing list archives for the error message
> to avoid reporting the same problem re
Hi,
I am planning to have subversion deployed as a version control tool and would
like few suggestions and clarifications on the same
Does subversion support the server replication method meaning the backup server
will be up and running with a less downtime required with all the data up-to
date?
I am surprised that If Tortoise SVN given an option to 'Export' that get Only
delta of that revision and 'Save revision to' in 'Show log' option.
Why there is no alternative command of these two options in subversion.
Cheers,
-Original Message-
From: Waseem Shahzad
Sent: Thursday,
Patrick Quirk writes:
Is the sqlite3 utility readily available on Windows? If it is then run:
sqlite3 .svn/wc.db "select * from work_queue"
>>>
>>> Yep, here's the output:
>>> 79|(file-install X/MONSTER.FMX/MONSTER.FMX.csproj 1 0 1 1)
>>> 80|(file-install X/MONSTER.FMX/Boxes/gbFMXDisp
---
Subversion Exception!
---
Subversion encountered a serious problem.
Please take the time to report this on the Subversion mailing list
(users@subversion.apache.org)
with as much information as possible about what
you were trying to do.
But please
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Hyrum K Wright writes:
>
>> Another option might be to run a pre-upgrade check to ensure this type
>> of error doesn't exist, before we irrevocably upgrade (and potentially
>> hose) the working copy.
>
> This is happening during upgrade so
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 04:29:03PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> In this particular case one of the checksum values in one of the
> .svn/entries files doesn't match the checksum of the corresponding file
> in .svn/text-base. The incorrect checksum won't show up as an error in
> 1.6 until an update
Hyrum K Wright writes:
> Another option might be to run a pre-upgrade check to ensure this type
> of error doesn't exist, before we irrevocably upgrade (and potentially
> hose) the working copy.
This is happening during upgrade so the working copy remains a 1.6
working copy.
--
Philip
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Stefan Sperling writes:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 04:28:21PM +0200, Daniel Sparing wrote:
>>> Dear fellow subversion users,
>>>
>>> as requested by the error message, i would like to report an error as
>>> the following:
>>>
>>> ---8<---
Stefan Sperling writes:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 04:28:21PM +0200, Daniel Sparing wrote:
>> Dear fellow subversion users,
>>
>> as requested by the error message, i would like to report an error as
>> the following:
>>
>> ---8<---
>> In file
>>
>> 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 04:28:21PM +0200, Daniel Sparing wrote:
>> Dear fellow subversion users,
>>
>> as requested by the error message, i would like to report an error as
>> the following:
>>
>> ---8<---
>> In file
>> 'D:\Development\SV
wrote:
>Thanks for your reply. Do you know if I need to have both SVN 1.7
>on the client and server side, or is just enough with the client?
I don't think so
anyways, I just read elsethread that dumpfilter does not work with the
dump format version that 1.7 uses.
>Any other way that doesn't in
It is my understanding (and experience) that, when running svnserve on
Windows, SASL authentication to Active Directory cannot work, because
SASL requires saslauthd for its LDAP support and saslauthd will not
build in Windows. While this is obviously an issue for Cyrus/SASL,
noone seems to be taki
>>> Is the sqlite3 utility readily available on Windows? If it is then run:
>>> sqlite3 .svn/wc.db "select * from work_queue"
>>
>> Yep, here's the output:
>> 79|(file-install X/MONSTER.FMX/MONSTER.FMX.csproj 1 0 1 1)
>> 80|(file-install X/MONSTER.FMX/Boxes/gbFMXDisplay.resx 1 0 1 1)
>> 81|(file-
Patrick Quirk writes:
>> Is the sqlite3 utility readily available on Windows? If it is then run:
>> sqlite3 .svn/wc.db "select * from work_queue"
>
> Yep, here's the output:
> 79|(file-install X/MONSTER.FMX/MONSTER.FMX.csproj 1 0 1 1)
> 80|(file-install X/MONSTER.FMX/Boxes/gbFMXDisplay.resx 1 0
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 04:28:21PM +0200, Daniel Sparing wrote:
> Dear fellow subversion users,
>
> as requested by the error message, i would like to report an error as
> the following:
>
> ---8<---
> In file
>
> 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_w
Dear fellow subversion users,
as requested by the error message, i would like to report an error as
the following:
---8<---
In file
'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\entries.c'
line 1935: assertion failed (svn_checksum_match(entry_md5_checksum,
Lorenz,
Thanks for your reply. Do you know if I need to have both SVN 1.7 on the client
and server side, or is just enough with the client?
Any other way that doesn't involve using brand new SVN?
Thanks!
--Jose
-Original Message-
From: Lorenz [mailto:loren...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednes
> Is this a working copy that you checked-out with the old 1.6 Tortoise
> and upgraded to 1.7, or is it a working copy that you checked-out with
> 1.7?
This is a 1.6.17 working copy that was upgraded.
> A text-conflict or a tree-conflict? Do you have any local modifications
> to the working copy
On 13.10.2011 15:54, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Andrey Paramonov wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:51:46 +0400:
On 13.10.2011 15:42, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:37:36PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote:
On 13.10.2011 15:24, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
No, it's a feature, showing that tho
Andrey Paramonov wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:51:46 +0400:
> On 13.10.2011 15:42, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:37:36PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote:
> >>On 13.10.2011 15:24, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >>>No, it's a feature, showing that those lines are new in the
> >>>local
On 13.10.2011 15:42, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:37:36PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote:
On 13.10.2011 15:24, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
No, it's a feature, showing that those lines are new in the
locally-modified version. You can do
% svn blame file@BASE
for the old behaviour.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 01:42:08PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:37:36PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote:
> > The new intended behavior seems very reasonable. However, the
> > observed behavior is clearly a bug: I get "- -" for all lines, not
> > just locally modified one
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:37:36PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote:
> On 13.10.2011 15:24, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >No, it's a feature, showing that those lines are new in the
> >locally-modified version. You can do
> >% svn blame file@BASE
> >for the old behaviour.
> >
>
> The new intended behavior
On 13.10.2011 15:24, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
No, it's a feature, showing that those lines are new in the
locally-modified version. You can do
% svn blame file@BASE
for the old behaviour.
The new intended behavior seems very reasonable. However, the observed
behavior is clearly a bug: I get "- -
No, it's a feature, showing that those lines are new in the
locally-modified version. You can do
% svn blame file@BASE
for the old behaviour.
Andrey Paramonov wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 13:14:35 +0400:
> Hello!
>
> To reproduce:
> 0) Checkout a working copy.
> 1) svn blame somefile. You will
Hello!
To reproduce:
0) Checkout a working copy.
1) svn blame somefile. You will get lines of somefile annotated with
revision and committer.
2) Modify somefile.
3) svn blame somefile. You will get lines of somefile annotated with
double hyphens -- revision and committer information not availa
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 04:54, theresa merenkov
wrote:
>
> I was using Tortoise SVN 1.6 and began having problems loading a file that
> was 1gig up through the high speed internet provider I have Astound
> broadband. I think this is a network issue, because I get the same message,
> if I'm upl
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 00:12, A. Kudryashov wrote:
>
> In file
> 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\entries.c'
> line 1935: assertion failed (svn_checksum_match(entry_md5_checksum,
> found_md5_checksum))
>
>
If you'd read the whole error message
I was using Tortoise SVN 1.6 and began having problems loading a
file that was 1gig up through the high speed internet provider I
have Astound broadband. I think this is a network issue, because I
get the same message, if I'm uploading
a large amount of data (could this
Patrick Quirk writes:
> I upgraded to 1.7 yesterday when the new version of Tortoise came out,
> and used it with no issues last evening and today until I encountered
> this assertion:
>
> In file
> 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\workqueue.c'
>
Thanks for your reply.
I have used the output of :
svn diff --summarize
Here I get.
https:// ---/svn/demo/Integration WorkSpace/Database/S_1.txt
https://---/svn/demo/Integration WorkSpace/Dlls/test2.txt
when I put this output in command as:
svn export -r 2 " https://--
2011/10/13 Waseem Shahzad :
> Hi
>
> I am trying to get the only changed files in the revision. I am
> using this ..
>
>
>
> svn export -r 2 "svnrepository" destination
>
>
>
> This command Is getting all the files including changed files.
>
> Below concept is good for me but it doesn’
2011/10/13 Jon Hardcastle :
> Think you might be on to something there... I'll have to try it out.. then I
> can sleep easy :) and not think it is corruption!
>
> On 7 October 2011 12:55, Neil Bird wrote:
>>
>> Around about 06/10/11 10:07, Jon Hardcastle typed ...
>>>
>>> I have an oddity I have n
Think you might be on to something there... I'll have to try it out.. then I
can sleep easy :) and not think it is corruption!
On 7 October 2011 12:55, Neil Bird wrote:
> Around about 06/10/11 10:07, Jon Hardcastle typed ...
>
> I have an oddity I have never seen before. I have a log entry when
Guten Tag A. Kudryashov,
am Donnerstag, 13. Oktober 2011 um 06:12 schrieben Sie:
> 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\entries.c'
> line 1935: assertion failed (svn_checksum_match(entry_md5_checksum,
> found_md5_checksum))
Bad thing.
Mit freundl
Hi
I am trying to get the only changed files in the revision. I
am using this ..
svn export -r 2 "svnrepository" destination
This command Is getting all the files including changed files.
Below concept is good for me but it doesn't export.
svn log -vr 2 svnrepository
62 matches
Mail list logo
