Excerpts from Daniel Shahaf's message of Fri Sep 23 22:32:21 -0400 2011:
Hi Daniel,
> The URL is not canonical because it contains a non-%-escaped space.
> The useful information to debug the problem would be to identify the
> caller who does not pass URLs through svn_[path|uri]_canonicalize()
>
The URL is not canonical because it contains a non-%-escaped space. The
useful information to debug the problem would be to identify the caller
who does not pass URLs through svn_[path|uri]_canonicalize() before
passing them to an API function (see comments at the top of
svn_dirent_uri.h).
Ben Wa
Hi All,
I was building the newly release git 1.7.6.4 against subversion
1.7.0_rc3 on Solaris and have encountered a test failure in one of the
git-svn interactions. Tracing it down, I'm getting a core dump from
perl (5.10.1) when running the git-svn init command. The error
message is:
svn: E23
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Mike Dixon
wrote:
>
> From personal experience back in the 1.5 days, externals were horribly slow
> and generally unwieldy to work with. Subversion had to open a fresh
> connection to the repository for every external, you have to set peg
> revisions on all your ex
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Cory Riddell wrote:
> On 9/23/2011 3:59 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Cory Riddell wrote:
>>> I'm thinking about committing all the third party libraries that our
>>> application depends on to make it easier to checkout a buildable se
On 9/23/2011 2:18 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Sep 23, 2011, at 16:16, Cory Riddell wrote:
Both you and Mark suggested I use externals. I've avoided using
externals because I've read more than one article advising against them.
I'm going to have to rethink this I guess. Can you use them without
On Sep 23, 2011, at 16:16, Cory Riddell wrote:
> Both you and Mark suggested I use externals. I've avoided using
> externals because I've read more than one article advising against them.
> I'm going to have to rethink this I guess. Can you use them without
> abusing them?
What article was that?
On 9/23/2011 3:59 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Cory Riddell wrote:
>> I'm thinking about committing all the third party libraries that our
>> application depends on to make it easier to checkout a buildable set of
>> files from the past.
>>
>> Some of the libraries ar
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Cory Riddell wrote:
> I'm thinking about committing all the third party libraries that our
> application depends on to make it easier to checkout a buildable set of
> files from the past.
>
> Some of the libraries are around a gigabyte each. Right now our
> reposit
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Cory Riddell wrote:
> I'm thinking about committing all the third party libraries that our
> application depends on to make it easier to checkout a buildable set of
> files from the past.
>
> Some of the libraries are around a gigabyte each. Right now our
> reposit
I'm thinking about committing all the third party libraries that our
application depends on to make it easier to checkout a buildable set of
files from the past.
Some of the libraries are around a gigabyte each. Right now our
repository has around a decade of history and is 5 GB. If we start
stuff
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Andreas Krey wrote:
>
> Don't make me rant. The svn user interface (at least the one that
> is ontopic here, namely the 'svn' CLI) is horrible, mostly due to
> the fact that svn only pretends to have branches and doesn't have
> tags at all. (It replaces them by a c
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:41:54 +, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
...
> I didn't write any commit triggers regarding tags until now, but am
> able to use them.
Except that they behave like branches instead of tags. If you check
out a tag and then commit into it, there will be exactly no warning.
Neithe
Maybe it's sqlite, try disabling rep-sharing in fsfs.conf?
David Asbury wrote on Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:14:48 +:
> Dear all
>
> Can someone tell me when byte-range locking was introduced into SVN?
>
> We are using SVN 1.6 and can see warning messages in our SVN server
> /var/log/messages wa
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:18 AM, David Weintraub wrote:
>
> Having a publicly available Subversion repository is the best way. The
> problem is what do you do if you don't have that.
VPN's are the usual approach to having access over the internet to
something that isn't public. OpenVPN is fair
Dear all
Can someone tell me when byte-range locking was introduced into SVN?
We are using SVN 1.6 and can see warning messages in our SVN server
/var/log/messages warning that byte-range locking is not supported in
AFS (except in the local machine). Our repositories are in AFS.
AFS is important
Very cool did not know about that. thanks!
On 9/23/2011 7:39 AM, shrinivasan wrote:
On Friday 23 September 2011 04:58 PM, Phil Pinkerton wrote:
A while back I posted a question about various Application/utilities
that provide a way to "Search" Subversion Repositories.
My email got trashed (M
2011/9/23 Phil Pinkerton :
> A while back I posted a question about various Application/utilities that
> provide a way to "Search" Subversion Repositories.
>
> My email got trashed (MS BSOD & disk crash) and I no longer have that
> wonderful list.
This mailing list is archived, and in many places.
On Friday 23 September 2011 04:58 PM, Phil Pinkerton wrote:
A while back I posted a question about various Application/utilities
that provide a way to "Search" Subversion Repositories.
My email got trashed (MS BSOD & disk crash) and I no longer have that
wonderful list.
If by chance someone
Phil Pinkerton schreef op 23/09/2011 13:28:00:
> A while back I posted a question about various Application/utilities
> that provide a way to "Search" Subversion Repositories.
>
> My email got trashed (MS BSOD & disk crash) and I no longer have that
> wonderful list.
>
> If by chance someone
A while back I posted a question about various Application/utilities
that provide a way to "Search" Subversion Repositories.
My email got trashed (MS BSOD & disk crash) and I no longer have that
wonderful list.
If by chance someone has a list or knows of such utilities or
application open s
Guten Tag Andreas Krey,
am Freitag, 23. September 2011 um 08:00 schrieben Sie:
> The svn user interface (at least the one that
> is ontopic here, namely the 'svn' CLI) is horrible, mostly due to
> the fact that svn only pretends to have branches and doesn't have
> tags at all. (It replaces them by
22 matches
Mail list logo
