On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 07:13:22PM -0700, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Sounds to me like operator error of the following kind: the developer
> modified the files in the working copy, and also made identical modifications
> to the corresponding pristine files in .svn/text-base (frequently this
> happen
Hi,
Von: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> >>
> >> Sounds to me like operator error of the following kind: the
developer
> >> modified the files in the working copy, and also made identical
> >> modifications to the corresponding pristine files in .svn/text-base
> >> (frequently this h
On Jul 12, 2011, at 07:43, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Or even better, an optional cvs-like mode where you don't need the pristine
> copies on the client at all.
The request to allow working copies without text-base is filed here:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=525
Related is t
Or, you know, a cron job that runs 'svn ls ^/subversion/tags'.
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 15:15:09 +0200:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:16:07PM -0700, Roedy Green wrote:
> > This is not a bug. You used to post the current fully qualified version
> > of Subversion on your home pag
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:15:33PM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:13:22 +, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> ...
> > Sounds to me like operator error of the following kind: the developer
> > modified the files in the working copy, and also made identical
> > modifications to the corr
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:13:22 +, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
...
> Sounds to me like operator error of the following kind: the developer
> modified the files in the working copy, and also made identical modifications
> to the corresponding pristine files in .svn/text-base (frequently this
> happens w
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:16:07PM -0700, Roedy Green wrote:
> This is not a bug. You used to post the current fully qualified version
> of Subversion on your home page. Today you stopped doing that.
I am not entire sure what you mean.
But the news section has accumulated enough entries to move
This is not a bug. You used to post the current fully qualified version
of Subversion on your home page. Today you stopped doing that. This
makes automated version release detection difficult. Please go back to
posting it.
--
click attached vCard (Rolodex icon) for contact details
<>
On 7/12/11 7:18 AM, Markus Schaber wrote:
Sounds to me like operator error of the following kind: the developer
modified the files in the working copy, and also made identical
modifications to the corresponding pristine files in .svn/text-base
(frequently this happens when using a batch search-r
Hi, Ryan,
Von: Ryan Schmidt [mailto:subversion-20...@ryandesign.com]
>
> Sounds to me like operator error of the following kind: the developer
> modified the files in the working copy, and also made identical
> modifications to the corresponding pristine files in .svn/text-base
> (frequently this
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Schmidt [mailto:subversion-20...@ryandesign.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 12 juli 2011 4:13
> To: Warren Jones
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Perplexing results of SVN commit
>
> On Jul 11, 2011, at 14:07, Warren Jones wrote:
>
> > One of our d
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Krey [mailto:a.k...@gmx.de]
> Sent: dinsdag 12 juli 2011 10:07
> To: Geoff Hoffman
> Cc: Subversion
> Subject: Re: Doing svn checkouts on top of svn checkouts?
>
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:30:06 +, Geoff Hoffman wrote:
> ...
> > To clarify what
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: dinsdag 12 juli 2011 5:47
> To: Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Cc: Geoff Hoffman; Subversion
> Subject: Re: Doing svn checkouts on top of svn checkouts?
>
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 23:42:
The installation was successfull, but i cannot create a repository.
Here is the output:
---
[root@mycomputer me]# svnadmin create /var/svn/repos
Check that the folder /var/svn is already created.
I think, that folder is not there.
Regards,
Shrinivasan
CollabNet Support
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:30:06 +, Geoff Hoffman wrote:
...
> To clarify what I meant - say you have Repo-A/Path-B and Repo-X/Path-Y. You
> could cd into your working copy of Path-B and do svn checkout Repo-X/Path-Y
> Y and end up with B/Y in your working copy such that changes under Y commit
> to
>
> Geoff Hoffman wrote on Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 18:20:41 -0700:
> > This is a feature, yes. Subversion does allow your working copy to point
> to
> > more than 1 svn path.
> >
>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Geoff: you cannot point a single working copy item at more tha
16 matches
Mail list logo