Exception while Reverting to earlier Revision. The intervening revisions had
tree conflicts that had been resolved by replacing. Reverting to have another
go at it.
---
Subversion Exception!
---
Subversion encountered a serious problem.
Please ta
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:23, Andrea Antonio Maleci wrote:
> There is a smart way to get modified files only of a branch ?
Modified relative to what? Current state of trunk? Modified since the
branch was created? Modified since the last checkout/update of your
working copy?
There is a smart way to get modified files only of a branch ?
Thanks
Andrea
Hi Stephan,
Thanks, I wanted to setup my private email too and couldn't remember
Hope you are all well
-Chris
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:41:30PM +0200, Christopher Richard Dobbs wrote:
> > I wish to subscribe to this mailing list.
> > My
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:41:30PM +0200, Christopher Richard Dobbs wrote:
> I wish to subscribe to this mailing list.
> My name is Christopher Dobbs and I work for EDB in Norway - I recently
> attended the Berlin Subversion meeting.
Hi Christopher,
Welcome!
Just send an email to users-subscr...
I wish to subscribe to this mailing list.
My name is Christopher Dobbs and I work for EDB in Norway - I recently
attended the Berlin Subversion meeting.
Uwe Schuster wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:02:08AM +0200, Uwe Schuster wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote:
1. Performance
Can you set
http-library=neon
in the '[global]' section of your 'servers' configuration file
and see if that helps?
The checkout finishes within
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:02:08AM +0200, Uwe Schuster wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote:
1. Performance
Can you set
http-library=neon
in the '[global]' section of your 'servers' configuration file
and see if that helps?
The checkout finishes within 2minutes for me (wit
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:29:56PM +0200, Björn Kasteleiner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm new to the subversion users mailing list.
>
> Due to a larger subversion server setup, I would like to backport the
> AuthzSVNReposRelativeAccessFile feature of the Apache authz module.
> This backport patch is b
Hello,
I'm new to the subversion users mailing list.
Due to a larger subversion server setup, I would like to backport the
AuthzSVNReposRelativeAccessFile feature of the Apache authz module.
This backport patch is based on the revisions 1030536 and 1071781. Except one
small change due to missin
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:30:48PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> This error is raised in the ra layer (Inside svn_ra_reparent) where you have
> a connection to a single repository via its url: In that location it should
> fail on every url not pointing to exactly the same repository.
Right. I'm not
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:29:54PM +0500, Waseem Bokhari wrote:
> Can you share binary for Windows> Tortosie SVN 7.0.0 or simply SVN 7.0
> command line for Windows
>
See here: http://subversion.apache.org/packages.html#pre-release
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: dinsdag 21 juni 2011 10:31
> To: Daniel Shahaf
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; Uwe Schuster
> Subject: Re: 1.7.0-alpha1 feedback
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:51:08AM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > FWIW it's n
Can you share binary for Windows> Tortosie SVN 7.0.0 or simply SVN 7.0
command line for Windows
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 1:31 PM
To: Daniel Shahaf
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; Uwe Schuster
Subject: Re: 1.7.0-alpha1 f
Miguel Almeida wrote on Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:32:32 +0100:
> Thanks for your replies,
>
> Either way, neither the linux nor the cross-platform alternative
> ( --add-header date=`LC_ALL=C date +"%a, %d %b %Y %H:%M:%S %z"`)
> actually work. The result on my Evolution (which I know is more
> sensit
Thanks for your replies,
Either way, neither the linux nor the cross-platform alternative
( --add-header date=`LC_ALL=C date +"%a, %d %b %Y %H:%M:%S %z"`)
actually work. The result on my Evolution (which I know is more
sensitive than other mail readers like thunderbird or even gmail) yields
for an
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:14:34PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:38:01 +0200:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:24:21AM +0100, Miguel Almeida wrote:
> > > And also, what does
> > > the LC_ALL=C part mean in the line you suggest?
> >
> > It implies LC_C
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:38:01 +0200:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:24:21AM +0100, Miguel Almeida wrote:
> > And also, what does
> > the LC_ALL=C part mean in the line you suggest?
>
> It implies LC_CTIME=C, which for in some cases controls how the date
> will be formatted o
On Jun 21, 2011, at 03:24, Miguel Almeida wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 22:17 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>
>> Miguel Almeida wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 15:02:27 +0100:
>> > I tried adding the following, but with no success (I must be passing
>> > the date wrongly):
>> > --add-header da
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:24:21AM +0100, Miguel Almeida wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 22:17 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > Miguel Almeida wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 15:02:27 +0100:
> > > I tried adding the following, but with no success (I must be passing
> > > the date wro
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:51:08AM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> FWIW it's not just a problem with (explicit) port specifications, there
> is a similar issue when an external definition uses https://svn.a.o and
> my checkout URL uses https://svn.eu.a.o.
>
> The 'same repos' checks could use UUID r
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 22:17 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Miguel Almeida wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 15:02:27 +0100:
> > I tried adding the following, but with no success (I must be passing
> > the date wrongly):
> > --add-header date=`date -R`
>
> --add-header Date="`date -R`"
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:20:55 +0200:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:02:08AM +0200, Uwe Schuster wrote:
> > Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >
> > >Thanks for testing the alpha!
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback!
> >
> > >>1. Performance
> > >
> > >Can you set
> > > http-library=n
23 matches
Mail list logo
