Re: An access permissions problem

2010-12-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:46 AM, David Aldrich wrote: > Hi > > > > We host each of our  projects in a separate svn repo and control access > permissions via Apache. Put the confidential materials in a separate repository. Use svn:externals to access that separate, more securely managed repository

RE: newbie doubt.. problem with import in windows

2010-12-21 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: sajan [mailto:sajanjos...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 3:58 AM > > > URLs always have forward slashes. Try something like: > >  svn import myproject file:///C:/code/svnrepo/myproject > > > thanks Stefan, > sajan Next time, I suggest making a subject which is more suggesti

Re: Looking to hire Software Engineers to Help Develop Subversion

2010-12-21 Thread David Richards
Johan, Firstly, thank you for caring about Subversion - we *do*, passionately. 1. The feeling of a lack of progress is not new and it's not just "WANdisco's big customers" as you put it. I don't think I am blaming any individual - it's just a fact of life as I said "*We are not happy with the vol

Re: A problem trying to use svn:// and http:// for a same repository at the same time

2010-12-21 Thread David Xie
Thanks Stefan. Wow, it really works when disable authz. This means I could access to svn:// 172.18.127.148/test (read and write) and successfully to view log history. Hard to believe! #authz-db = authz And the logs are showed correctly without authz. What's wrong? What should I do to make authz

Re: Revisions being involved while comparing branches

2010-12-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Pablo Beltran wrote on Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 23:29:23 +0100: > Maybe the point is efficiency. > OK. > the *svn log -v* output for a revision range could be represented by a > matrix with the revision numbers as rows and the changed paths as columns. > > So, for each revision is easy inquire the

Re: Looking to hire Software Engineers to Help Develop Subversion

2010-12-21 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:32 PM, David Richards wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:25 PM, David Weintraub wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Pablo Beltran wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I have no doubt about those all features will be good for the future of >> > Subversion, from a technic

Re: Revisions being involved while comparing branches

2010-12-21 Thread Pablo Beltran
Maybe the point is efficiency. the *svn log -v* output for a revision range could be represented by a matrix with the revision numbers as rows and the changed paths as columns. So, for each revision is easy inquire the revised paths. That is simple because all the results are retrieved from one

Re: svnsync failure when syncing with a repository that used ISO-8859-1 for log messages

2010-12-21 Thread Danny Trebbien
> > Hi Danny, > > I am working with Geir Engebakken on this and we understand you won't > > release > > the patch now until 1.7.x - That's fine but I wanted to try out the patch > > myself > > now so I tried to run it in and it is looking for sync.c and sync.h which > > dont > > seem to exist in

RE: Looking to hire Software Engineers to Help Develop Subversion

2010-12-21 Thread Bob Archer
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:25 PM, David Weintraub > wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Pablo Beltran > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have no doubt about those all features will be good for the > future of > > Subversion, from a technical point of view. > > > > On the other hand, the underlayi

Re: Looking to hire Software Engineers to Help Develop Subversion

2010-12-21 Thread David Richards
David, Absolutely correct! Your analysis / explanation is much better than my own. Thank you. - David On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:25 PM, David Weintraub wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Pablo Beltran wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have no doubt about those all features will be good for the

Re: Looking to hire Software Engineers to Help Develop Subversion

2010-12-21 Thread David Weintraub
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Pablo Beltran wrote: > Hi, > > I have no doubt about those all features will be good for the future of > Subversion, from a technical point of view. > > On the other hand, the underlaying message scares me. The message is clear: > Apache can't drive the development

Re: Looking to hire Software Engineers to Help Develop Subversion

2010-12-21 Thread Pablo Beltran
Hi, I have no doubt about those all features will be good for the future of Subversion, from a technical point of view. On the other hand, the underlaying message scares me. The message is clear: Apache can't drive the development process by itself and only Wandisco can do it in the right way and

Re: SVN BUG : Lines disappeared after update and check in

2010-12-21 Thread Johan Corveleyn
[ please don't top-post, i.e. put your reply at the bottom (or inline) of the thing you're replying to. I reshuffled a bit below, to make the ordering more logical for this list. ] On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:55 PM, riad benmouhoub wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Bob Archer wrote: >> >>

Re: SVN BUG : Lines disappeared after update and check in

2010-12-21 Thread riad benmouhoub
I did so and the lines are there! Riad On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Bob Archer wrote: > I would do a diff between the rev that you update to, and the one before > that. See if lines were removed. 1.6.5 isn't that old. > > ( you should reply all so messages go to the list too.) > > > > BOb >

Looking to hire Software Engineers to Help Develop Subversion

2010-12-21 Thread David Richards
[This is a one-off and we will not post this again on this list] Following the announcementby WANdisco yesterday that we would undertake the work to fix / improve branching and merging in Subversion; we are on the lookout for new Subver

RE: SVN BUG : Lines disappeared after update and check in

2010-12-21 Thread Bob Archer
> I experienced the following behavior with SVN. The steps i did are > : > > 1- I made changes in a file > 2- updated the file > 3- Checked in the file after the merge succeeded > 4- In the resulting file 6 lines disappeared. > > Is it considered as a bug? > has anyone experienced such a behavior

Re: An access permissions problem

2010-12-21 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:28:29PM -0500, David Weintraub wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:59 AM, David Aldrich > wrote: > > Thanks for your help. Yes, the branches, tags, and trunk directories are at > > the root. In your suggestion, I am worried that a developer might create a > > branch co

Re: svn: database disk image is malformed

2010-12-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 20:41:43 +0200: > CC += dev@ > > Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 18:49:22 +0100: > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 05:03:00PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote: > > > I try to commit the change > > > > > > $ svn commit -m "minor change" > > > Sending

SVN BUG : Lines disappeared after update and check in

2010-12-21 Thread riad benmouhoub
Hi, I experienced the following behavior with SVN. The steps i did are : 1- I made changes in a file 2- updated the file 3- Checked in the file after the merge succeeded 4- In the resulting file 6 lines disappeared. Is it considered as a bug? has anyone experienced such a behavior? Thanks Riad

Re: An access permissions problem

2010-12-21 Thread David Weintraub
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:59 AM, David Aldrich wrote: > Thanks for your help. Yes, the branches, tags, and trunk directories are at > the root. In your suggestion, I am worried that a developer might create a > branch containing ConfidentialFolder in /branches rather than in > /branches/Confid

Re: File Obstructed by Symbolic Link Prevents Submitting Unrelated Changelists

2010-12-21 Thread Nick
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 12:02 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > When I read that part of the page I wasn't sure if it was a mix of > > tigris.org and apache.org, or still entirely tigris.org. Thanks for > the > > clarification. > > Fixed: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/publish/issue-

Re: File Obstructed by Symbolic Link Prevents Submitting Unrelated Changelists

2010-12-21 Thread Nick
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 11:59 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > I've updated some > fields, and I'll try to get around to look at it in more detail some > time. I appreciate it, thanks!

RE: An access permissions problem

2010-12-21 Thread David Aldrich
Hi David Thanks for your help. Yes, the branches, tags, and trunk directories are at the root. In your suggestion, I am worried that a developer might create a branch containing ConfidentialFolder in /branches rather than in /branches/ConfidentialBranches, by mistake. Do you agree that is a prob

Re: An access permissions problem

2010-12-21 Thread David Weintraub
It looks like the, branches, tags, and trunk directories are at the root of your repository. What if you create the confidential branches under their own folder under the branches and tags directories instead of directly under those directories? Then, you could specify it this way: [myproj:/trunk

An access permissions problem

2010-12-21 Thread David Aldrich
Hi We host each of our projects in a separate svn repo and control access permissions via Apache. In one large project, we need to limit the visibility of a few confidential files. We have done this by specifying something like: [myproj:/trunk/ConfidentialFolder] @myPrivilegedGroup = rw * =

Merge tracking between several parallel branches

2010-12-21 Thread Fredrik Orderud
I have some questions regarding the status of the merge tracking functionality in subversion 1.6.  Based on my understanding, it seems like svn has good “automatic” support for merging between branches in one direction, whereas cyclic/bidirectional merging requires a more complex “reintegrate” + “r

Re: Revisions being involved while comparing branches

2010-12-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
'svn info' on the 1.6.15 file will tell you that. (thanks cheap copies) 'dig the logs' is "lookup the copyfrom revisions of the tags, and run log on replay.c for that revision range". What's wrong with that? Pablo Beltran wrote on Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 19:22:20 +0100: > Is there a direct way (via

Re: File Obstructed by Symbolic Link Prevents Submitting Unrelated Changelists

2010-12-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nick wrote on Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 21:01:59 -0500: > On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 17:34 -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > The Subversion project still uses the tigris.org issue tracker; it > > does not yet use the apache.org issue tracker. See the yellow box on > > this page: > > > > http://subversion.ap

Re: File Obstructed by Symbolic Link Prevents Submitting Unrelated Changelists

2010-12-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nick wrote on Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 18:17:02 -0500: > On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 19:19 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > I can reproduce this with trunk: > > [[[ > > % cd wc1/trunk/ > > % touch a b c d > > % $svn add -q ? > > % $svn ci -q -m add > > % echo line1 >a >b > > % rm c; ln -s d c > > % $svn cl -

Re: A problem trying to use svn:// and http:// for a same repository at the same time

2010-12-21 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 04:25:55PM +0800, 谢带达 wrote: > Thank you Stefan. > > I start svnserve this way: > > /local/svnroot/repository/one/conf/svnserve.conf > [general] > anon-access = > auth-access = write > password-db = passwd > authz-db = authz > /local/svnroot/repository/one/conf/authz > [/]

Re: newbie doubt.. problem with import in windows

2010-12-21 Thread sajan
> URLs always have forward slashes. Try something like: >  svn import myproject file:///C:/code/svnrepo/myproject > thanks Stefan, sajan

Re: A problem trying to use svn:// and http:// for a same repository at the same time

2010-12-21 Thread 谢带达
Thank you Ryan. I read the sections: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.serverconfig.multimethod.html and http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.reposadmin.maint.html#svn.reposadmin.maint.replication The multiple access methods section seems not to help me to resolve my question. About