Daniel Shahaf daniel.shahaf.name> writes:
>
> LiuYan 刘研 wrote on Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:53:37 +:
> > Daniel Shahaf daniel.shahaf.name> writes:
> >
> > >
> > > Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 18:13:44 +0100:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:06:19PM +, LiuYan 刘研 wrote:
LiuYan 刘研 wrote on Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:53:37 +:
> Daniel Shahaf daniel.shahaf.name> writes:
>
> >
> > Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 18:13:44 +0100:
> > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:06:19PM +, LiuYan 刘研 wrote:
> > > > I mean, if the revprops files are not in UTF-8 enco
Daniel Shahaf daniel.shahaf.name> writes:
>
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 18:13:44 +0100:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:06:19PM +, LiuYan 刘研 wrote:
> > > I mean, if the revprops files are not in UTF-8 encoding, don't return
REPORT
>
> Small correction: it's meaningless
Hi Stefan,
We don't use SVN in it's classic setup.
Well basically it is more a case of we don't actually do "releases".
We do all dev work locally.
A CRON job on the staging server; does an svn update - and that (staging) local
working copy becomes the staging delpoyment for our web application.
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Archer"
To: "Gingko" ; "Subversion User List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 8:14 PM
Subject: RE: svnserve : anonymous access not working
> -Original Message-
> From: Gingko [mailto:from_tig...@nospam.homelinux.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, Novem
> -Original Message-
> From: Gingko [mailto:from_tig...@nospam.homelinux.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 1:27 PM
> To: Subversion User List
> Subject: Re: svnserve : anonymous access not working
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Bob Archer"
> > To: "Gingko" ; "Subver
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Archer"
To: "Gingko" ; "Subversion User List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 3:40 PM
Subject: RE: svnserve : anonymous access not working
> I have a problem with svnserve :
>
> [..]
>
> Isn't it enough to set "anon-access = read" for allowing
Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 18:13:44 +0100:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:06:19PM +, LiuYan 刘研 wrote:
> > I mean, if the revprops files are not in UTF-8 encoding, don't return
> > REPORT
Small correction: it's meaningless to talk about the encoding of the
revprop files; it's
2010/11/17 Pazmiño Mazón, Iván Andrés :
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to solve a simple problem but can't find how in the svn-book.
> I need to manage my users in groups, actually teams, I need only team
> members to have read/write access to a set of projects and the rest of
> the organization only read
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:06:19PM +, LiuYan 刘研 wrote:
> My orginal idea is:
> If this "svn: REPORT of " error is returned by mod_dav_svn, can it act
> friendly
> as the same as svnserve ?
> I mean, if the revprops files are not in UTF-8 encoding, don't return REPORT
> Failed to client side,
> I'm trying to solve a simple problem but can't find how in the svn-
> book.
> I need to manage my users in groups, actually teams, I need only
> team
> members to have read/write access to a set of projects and the rest
> of
> the organization only read access.
>
> My subversion authenticates us
Stefan Sperling elego.de> writes:
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:48:07AM +, LiuYan 刘研 wrote:
> > I converted CVSNT respositoy to SVN repository some days ago, and config
> > mod_dav_svn in Apache http.conf.
> >
> >
> > When I try 'svn log http://192.168.105.4:8000/svn/cmcc', it shown some
Hello,
I'm trying to solve a simple problem but can't find how in the svn-book.
I need to manage my users in groups, actually teams, I need only team
members to have read/write access to a set of projects and the rest of
the organization only read access.
My subversion authenticates users with a
> I have a problem with svnserve :
>
> I want to configure it for allowing anonymous users to read it, but
> this
> don't work :
> if I checkout (using TortoiseSVN), I am always asked to supply my
> password.
>
> If I do it, the checkout works fine.
>
> Otherwise I cannot checkout.
>
> And if I
Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 14:09:47 +0100:
> Note that you could also use the --accept="theirs-full" option to skip the
> interactive prompt.
>
In trunk, '--accept=tf' (using the shorthands from the interactive
resolver) also works. I've nominated the shorter spelling for 1.6.
You should probably also add --*ignore*-*ancestry* to that merge statement.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:00:25PM +1100, Gavin Beau Baumanis wrote:
> > I have been doing;
> > svn merge -r1:head trunk/somefile branches/somefeature/somefile
>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:00:25PM +1100, Gavin Beau Baumanis wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have a question about completely overwriting a destination file with a
> merge.
> I have been doing;
> svn merge -r1:head trunk/somefile branches/somefeature/somefile
>
> As long as I continue to choose "Their
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:48:07AM +, LiuYan 刘研 wrote:
> I converted CVSNT respositoy to SVN repository some days ago, and config
> mod_dav_svn in Apache http.conf.
>
>
> When I try 'svn log http://192.168.105.4:8000/svn/cmcc', it shown some logs
> but
> failed/terminated at some revisions
Hi there,
I have a question about completely overwriting a destination file with a merge.
I have been doing;
svn merge -r1:head trunk/somefile branches/somefeature/somefile
As long as I continue to choose "Their File" for any / all conflicts;
My question is - will this actually give me a complete
I converted CVSNT respositoy to SVN repository some days ago, and config
mod_dav_svn in Apache http.conf.
When I try 'svn log http://192.168.105.4:8000/svn/cmcc', it shown some logs but
failed/terminated at some revisions with a message like:
svn: REPORT of '/svn/cmcc/!svn/bc/1': 200 OK (http:/
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Neson Maxmelbin (RBEI/EMT5)
wrote:
> I want to setup a reliable development process for SVN in our environment.
>
>
> The initial baseline of the project will be in trunk folder.
>
> For the first Release, the trunk is checked out , changes made and then
> commited
> I doubt if there is a generic answer to that question, but with RHEL6
> recently released, maybe Centos6 will be released soon enough for your
> next upgrade and won't be outdated for a while. If you want the
> tradeoffs of faster update cycles, the main players are fedora and
> ubuntu where fed
22 matches
Mail list logo
