Re: svn Farm

2010-10-15 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:56:35AM -0700, David Brodbeck wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> > Think I'm kidding? Walk into any university environment: plug in a >> > live Linux CD. Run an "nmap" scan for

Re: Subversion equivalent to VSS diff for binary files

2010-10-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 15, 2010, at 12:06, Mark Phippard wrote: > Replying to list. > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Phil Pinkerton wrote: > >> Thanks that is exactly what I needed, I just need to figure out how to >> show that if a file was re-compiled but there are no changes that >> Subversion sees the

Re: svn Farm

2010-10-15 Thread Mark Phippard
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:58 PM, David Brodbeck wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> As of 1.6, Subversion asks the user before saving passwords in >> plaintext. 1.6 also added support for using GNOME Keyring and KDE Wallet >> as password stores. > > Yup.  There ar

AW: Bug report against SVN 1.6.13

2010-10-15 Thread Paul Maier
Hi Stefan! Thank you for having responded. Of course, after the commit, the file is read-only. Sorry. I don't know how to implement this. But it pains me a lot. So I need to look for a crack, who is interested in implementing this? Or how is the procedure? Do I have to go through some steps to

Re: Subversion equivalent to VSS diff for binary files

2010-10-15 Thread Mark Phippard
Replying to list. On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Phil Pinkerton wrote: > Thanks that is exactly what I needed, I just need to figure out how to > show that if a file was re-compiled but there are no changes that > Subversion sees the difference as perhaps a time stamp or some compile > data in

Re: Subversion equivalent to VSS diff for binary files

2010-10-15 Thread Mark Phippard
Replying to list. On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Phil Pinkerton wrote: > I am having a time understanding this also: > > OK here is what details I have quoted from from the other team: > > "A few things I want to point out...Subversion was meant for handling > text files not binary files.  WT

Re: Subversion equivalent to VSS diff for binary files

2010-10-15 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:43 AM, wrote: > > We are migrating teams off VSS and StarTeam to Subversion. > > Some say that VSS ( Visual Source Safe ) has a diff that tells them that a > binary has changed and what is the latest ( newest) version. > > Does Subversion have a way to accomplish the sa

Subversion equivalent to VSS diff for binary files

2010-10-15 Thread PINKERP1
We are migrating teams off VSS and StarTeam to Subversion. Some say that VSS ( Visual Source Safe ) has a diff that tells them that a binary has changed and what is the latest ( newest) version. Does Subversion have a way to accomplish the same binary "diff" they need ? Perhaps through file pr

Re: Secure connection truncated during checkout ?

2010-10-15 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Phil Pinkerton wrote: > Is there a solution for this issue or a work around that will not > compromise security ? > > During long svn operations such as checkout I am often getting the > following error: > > 'svn: REPORT of '/subversion/myproj/!svn/vcc/default': C

Secure connection truncated during checkout ?

2010-10-15 Thread Phil Pinkerton
Is there a solution for this issue or a work around that will not compromise security ? During long svn operations such as checkout I am often getting the following error: 'svn: REPORT of '/subversion/myproj/!svn/vcc/default': Could not read response body: Secure connection truncated' The locati

Re: TortoiseSVN overrides command line svn proxy configuration?

2010-10-15 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:51:36AM +0100, emerson wrote: >> It was quite surprising today when we were having problems with the >> proxy, and then we noticed that TortoiseSVN would override command >> line svn. Is that suppose to happen? >

Re: TortoiseSVN overrides command line svn proxy configuration?

2010-10-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:51:36AM +0100, emerson wrote: > It was quite surprising today when we were having problems with the > proxy, and then we noticed that TortoiseSVN would override command > line svn. Is that suppose to happen? > After unchecking the proxy configuration on tortoisesvn, the c

TortoiseSVN overrides command line svn proxy configuration?

2010-10-15 Thread emerson
It was quite surprising today when we were having problems with the proxy, and then we noticed that TortoiseSVN would override command line svn. Is that suppose to happen? After unchecking the proxy configuration on tortoisesvn, the command line started to work again, showing command line svn was a