Hi David,
David Brodbeck wrote on Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 14:31 -0700:
> I'm more interested in the feature suggested by the +1 in the subject
> line -- the ability to get *future* revisions that haven't been
> committed yet. Just think, you could start a new project, then check
> out HEAD+8972 and g
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 03:42:02PM -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
> Pablo,
>
> I apologize, my message was a lame attempt at humor. I didn't think
> through the fact that it might not translate, given the language
> barriers involved on this list.
If non-native speakers of English don't learn Engl
Pablo,
I apologize, my message was a lame attempt at humor. I didn't think through
the fact that it might not translate, given the language barriers involved on
this list.
On Apr 20, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Pablo Beltran wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I think this has not sense, because HEAD is the last
Hi David,
I think this has not sense, because HEAD is the last revision. So, HEAD+1
doesn't exist. If it exists then it must be HEAD again.
But maybe you ask about the forward history from a N+1 revision. I asked
about it in another forum and I get this answer (fs-successor-ids feature):
http://
On Apr 20, 2010, at 3:44 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> kost BebiX wrote on Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 14:38 +0400:
>> Hi! I would really like to see the ability for svn to do things like
>>
>> svn log -r HEAD:HEAD-1 to see changes. Right now I need to view revision
>> numbers first to do thing like this.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 09:57, Marvin Solomon
wrote:
>
> I have a repository with svnserver running on Linux and am trying to set up a
> client on Windows. I've successfully checked out a workspace with
> TortoiseSVN,
> but I'm having no luck at all with the cygwin version of the svn command-lin
I have a repository with svnserver running on Linux and am trying to set up a
client on Windows. I've successfully checked out a workspace with TortoiseSVN,
but I'm having no luck at all with the cygwin version of the svn command-line
client. Just about any command, such as
svn update
in t
I'm not able to connect with SVN from my eclipse.
It says, Synchronize operation failed.
svn: timed out waiting for server
svn: OPTIONS request failed on '/EMS/NewDB/EMSDEV/EMSDEV/src'
How to resolve this problem?
Regards
Jayaprakash
On 20. Apr. 2010, at 12:00, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/4/20 Jochen Küpper :
>> However, is there a way to tell svn (the repository) to permanently ignore
>> r1381 for merging?
>
> svn merge --record-only
>
> It creates a mergeinfo as if the merge already happened.
>
> See "Blocking Change
kost BebiX wrote on Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 14:38 +0400:
> Hi! I would really like to see the ability for svn to do things like
>
> svn log -r HEAD:HEAD-1 to see changes. Right now I need to view revision
> numbers first to do thing like this. What do you think about that?)
>
svn log -r HEAD:1 --li
Hi! I would really like to see the ability for svn to do things like
svn log -r HEAD:HEAD-1 to see changes. Right now I need to view revision
numbers first to do thing like this. What do you think about that?)
--
jabber: kost-be...@ya.ru
2010/4/20 Jochen Küpper :
> However, is there a way to tell svn (the repository) to permanently ignore
> r1381 for merging?
svn merge --record-only
It creates a mergeinfo as if the merge already happened.
See "Blocking Changes" here:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.branchmerge.advanced.h
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Ravi Roy wrote:
>
>
> 2010/4/20 Ulrich Eckhardt
>
> On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Ravi Roy wrote:
>> > I was curious to know if deleting a file from the repository also
>> decrease
>> > the size of the repository, but this is not true.
>>
>>
> Thanks to all of you
2010/4/20 Ulrich Eckhardt
> On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Ravi Roy wrote:
> > I was curious to know if deleting a file from the repository also
> decrease
> > the size of the repository, but this is not true.
>
>
Thanks to all of you for quick replies. Suppose somebody added a big chunk
of data to r
Hi,
I like to serve an svn via apache and like to secure this with ssl so
that write-access to svn is only possible via an ssl-secured connection
and read-only access via a normal http connection too.
Is this possible?
I've seen a few examples on the internet where this has been made by
addin
Hi
Yes, it is a feature, not a bug. The whole point of using a repository is
that you can always go back to a previous revision, so the file needs to
still be there.
Cheers / Erik
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Ravi Roy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was curious to know if deleting a file from the repo
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Ravi Roy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was curious to know if deleting a file from the repository also decrease
> the size of the repository, but this is not true.
>
It only get deleted from current version, file still exists in earlier
revisions.
>
> To verify this, I
On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Ravi Roy wrote:
> I was curious to know if deleting a file from the repository also decrease
> the size of the repository, but this is not true.
You can not delete anything irrevocably, this is a design karma of Subversion.
In other words, even a deleted file is only del
Hello,
I did recently on solaris and both modules was installed by SVN
installed in "/modules" directory of Apache HTTPD.
I think same should happen in Windows as well. I saw below note somewhere
"MUST INSTALL SVN "svn-x.x.x-setup.exe" BEFORE CONFIGURING APACHE FOR
SUBVERSION(SVN) AND RESTAR
Hi,
I was curious to know if deleting a file from the repository also decrease
the size of the repository, but this is not true.
To verify this, I check the size of the repository before adding 30 MB data
into into, after adding I again checked the size of the repository it is
still the same.
Is
Hi,
first, let me thank all people behind subversion for a great tool!
Although I've been using svn for many years, this is my first post here;-)
In a current project I had created a branch (branches/mine) of another branch
(branches/lutz). I am implementing a nice addon in my branch that shall
> Hi,
>
> we encountered (again) the error already discussed in the
> earlier thread
> "Corrupted FSFS commit" (starting February 25).
Update:
Server version: 1.6.5
Client version: 1.6.7
Martin
Hi, Subversion Community!
I am configuring svn through Apache 2.2.15 for win64 and faced a problem
with loading svn-related modules in httpd.conf. I cannot find appropriate
modules(mod_dav_svn.so and mod_authz_svn.so files) for Apache 2.2.x on
win64. Could you, please, hint me where I can find the
23 matches
Mail list logo
