Other guys wrote:
---
Well, what makes you think that Bayes is missing anything? SA needs to
be updated to work properly.
I keep all of the capture spam in a folder for examination. Even the
worst of the spam gives the following analysis:
Content analysis details: (17.0
(sorry my poor english)
Hi,
I have a machine with qmail+qmail-scanner+spamassassin 3.0.0. Some time ago,
I have saw that some spam are passing through filter with 0 score. Then, I
activated sa_debug='1' and sa_hdr_report='1' in qmail-scanner for see how SA
are giving the score to e-mails and I s
Robert - elists-2 wrote:
>
> Good question. Tough one without debugging your machine personally.
>
> Did you do any web searching for this?
>
> Have you considered upgrading to current SA 3.2.4 ?
>
> - rh
>
>
>
Yes, I have been finding any info relative to this, but I can't found
nothin
comparity wrote:
>
> Do you use sa-update?
>
>
> No I don't. However, I have just run it. restarted spamassassin
> (service spamassassin restart), and I'll see what happens.
>
Hi comparity,
has you could fix the problem updating SA?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabb
comparity wrote:
>
> spamis wrote:
>
>
> Hi comparity,
> has you could fix the problem updating SA?
>
>
>
> No, not as far as I can tell. I still get the same spam, and no
> indication that bayes has been applied.
>
> --
>
>
I&#x
