I have a successfully running Spam Assassin installation on my home email
server (running hMail for Windows). I installed the Spam Assassin a couple
of years ago and have let it do it's thing. It is running great today,
however, because it has been so long since I installed it I thought I would
How do you tell if sa-update is running successfully? I am running it right
now (under Windows) but I don't know how to confirm that it is running. I
ran with the -D option but I don't understand all of the things that it is
reporting (no apparent error messages). Is there a file date and time
I am installed under Windows XP. I have two copies of local.cf - one in
C:\Perl\site\etc\mail\spamassassin and one in C:\SpamAssassin\rules. Both
are the same. I want to start configuring my installation but I don't know
which one of these files I need to adjust. Is there something in my
confi
Thanks, now I know which one it is using I can start to play around with the
configuration!
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
>
> simonmason wrote:
>> I am installed under Windows XP. I have two copies of local.cf - one in
>> C:\Perl\site\etc\mail\spamassassin and one in C:\SpamAssass
I have successfully installed SpamAssassin and I am now starting to configure
it. However, I am a little confused as to which configuration files my
installation is using. I am running it under Windows XP Pro using hMail and
Perl.
Currently my files are stored in c:\spamassassin and I call it w
So I don't have to worry about the two copies of the rules files?
And I only alter the local.cf file as needed?
Spamassassin -D says I am running 3.2.4.
mouss-2 wrote:
>
> simonmason a écrit :
>> I have successfully installed SpamAssassin and I am now starting to
>> co
ns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
[3644] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.61
mouss-2 wrote:
>
> simonmason a écrit :
>> So I don't have to worry about the two copies of the rules files?
>>
>
> I'd say there's nothing to worry about, unless you have two
[3788] dbg: dns: is DNS available? 0
[3788] dbg: rules: local tests only, ignoring RBL eval
I also see references to not using razor2 and pyzor - I don't think I
installed this - do I need to? Thanks.
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, October 18, 2008 21:22, simonmason wrote:
&g
bg: check: is spam? score=4.205 required=5
[4028] dbg: check:
tests=MISSING_DATE,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS
[4028] dbg: check:
subtests=__HAS_MSGID,__MISSING_REF,__MSGID_OK_DIGITS,__MSGID_OK_HOST,__MSOE_MID_WRONG_CASE,__NONEMPTY_BODY,__SANE_MSGID,__UNUSABLE_MSGID
Thanks I fixed all of these. Now I am going to try and figure out razor2 and
python under windows. I haven't seen any good how-tos on this?
Gary V wrote:
>
> Just a couple things that stuck out for me. This is not an extensive
> evaluation.
>
>> [4028] warn: config: failed to parse line, ski
10 matches
Mail list logo