Good day,
I am running a pretty old Debian box with spamassassin 3.0 here. It seems to
have some problems with rulesdujour and hence I am wondering if I shouldn't
upgrade to the current version.
Pro: Current version has up to date docs and features
Cons: The machine is very important (proxy) an
Hi Martin,
thank you for the info.
So what I can see, Spamassassin is merely a perl module used by amavisd,
right? If I install the new version, it will just replace the old module and
add some little gadgets like sa-update?
Or could I use the sa-update script from a new version with my old
s
Good morning,
I have setup a test-installation of SA, fetching emails from my imap server
and parsing it through SA.
It works so far, yet I have noticed it does only scan for things like
invalid headers, RBL MX, invalid return adress and so on. But when I send
myself a test message with content
PS: I have made some other tests and it seems, the body is indeed scanned, as
it catched the testphrase just fine, but why not the porn stuff?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/SA-does-not-apply-content-filter-rules-tp19253738p19254301.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users
I have found the mistake, the init.pre contained some 5 entries of
modules, while spamassassin from the cli loaded around 20. Added those
modules to init.pre and now everything is scanned.
mouss-2 wrote:
>
> patrickbaer wrote:
>> PS: I have made some other tests and it seems, the bo
Hi all,
I now have SA installed at the live machine and it seems to be running ok,
at least no bigger issues besides an error loadeding RSA.pm, which I have no
idea what it is for?
Anyway, it still let's a load of spam through. For testing, I took one of
those spams out of an inbox and applied s
mouss-2 wrote:
>
> the question is why is it a NO_RECEIVED, NO_RELAYS mail? how do you pass
> the message to SA? can you show the message?
>
As I wrote, I usedproxy1:/tmp# spamassassin -D DNS available (set dns_available to override)
[10406] dbg: dns: name server: 172.24.250.2, LocalAddr: 0
And this is the output from the very same command, ran on the test box:
[26243] dbg: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre
[26243] dbg: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre
[26243] dbg: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/v312.pre
[26243] dbg: config: read file /etc/
I have now came down to a problem with the auto whitelist:
See the test machine:
[4998] dbg: auto-whitelist: tie-ing to DB file of type DB_File R/W in
/root/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist
[4998] dbg: auto-whitelist: db-based [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=190.173
scores 5/61.821
[4998] dbg: auto-whitelist:
ot sure what you think the problem is. If you are refering to the
> different scores then that is to be expected as the two systems are
> using different auto-whitelist databases and will probably have
> different data in them.
>
> patrickbaer wrote:
>> I have now cam
Dear Lord, I am going nuts! I promised my colleagues a new filter three days
ago. Now they are drowning in spam and I have no idea about what's going on!
I have this test-machine with a fresh installation of postfix, spamassassin
and amavisd and it works like a charme. I have a catch rate of no
McDonald, Dan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 06:18 -0700, patrickbaer wrote:
>
>> Now on the crappy live box, absolutely NOTHING works as it should. I just
>> tried, in my despair, to apply a custom rule, but no way it will accept
>> them! Added it to local.cf, n
Hi all,
relaxing from my hassle with the new machine :)
I'd like to set up a rule catching multiple dollar-signs in a message, I
don't see any other way to catch those heavily "encrypted" pill-emails like
this:
C A aN A DvAN P c cH A RM A oCY
VzA zG _RA - $1.48
C 9a A L u S - $2.24
S0
Hi all,
I'm looking for some regex to find a list of strings in the body,
independent where they are and so on.
Example:
i am Nice Girl good looking girl who is looking to chat with you.
email me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i will reply back with some really nice pics or skype realtime videos.
3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ciallam=2Ecom
i will reply back with some really nice pics or skype realtime videos=2E<=
/b>
--=_NextPart_17862_4630_01C914F5.1BF90F20--
Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
> patrickbaer schrieb:
>> Hi all,
>>
>&g
Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Was this patch correct then?
>
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-July/037375.html
>
> So, we jules are no longer listed and (b) the score will be 2.0 if buth
> subrules match and zero otherwise.
>
>
> Martin
It's ugly, but it actually seems to work:
rawbody PBA_TEST /Content.*\n\n.*\n.*http.*\n\n-/
Any comments before I activate it?
patrickbaer wrote:
>
> Sorry for not posting a whole email, I tried but the message got blocked
> :)
>
> My problem are those two-line
17 matches
Mail list logo