Yikes - that's a lot of razor configs to edit, I have 1000 users invoking
spamc from procmail... time to whip up a little perl script I guess.
BTW I have head of folly and joy, but where does one find the definitive
list of cloudmark servers?
e
Bill Landry said:
> - Original Message -
>
Thanks for the info -
BTW the cloudmark servers seem to all be back online now...
e
Bill Landry said:
> - Original Message -
> From: "kaiser suse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> BTW I have head of folly and joy, but where does one find the definitive
>>
Steve Bertrand said:
> I work for an ISP. My laptop, seldomly moved from the office is
> configured to send out my [EMAIL PROTECTED] email through this ISP
> SMTP server. I take my laptop home, which is connected to a different
> SMTP server. Unwittingly, I change the SMTP server to the home ISP'
Bret Miller said:
> Yes, you should. But what happens if my almost-informed user decides to
> do it the old way? Do you blacklist my domain because a user decided to
> do things wrong?
I'm not sure how things could come to such a state - using SPF does not
"blacklist domains", but rather penaliz
Kelson said:
> Someone made a suggestion to blacklist based on SPF results. Problems
> were pointed out. The suggestion was withdrawn. The thread continues
> anyway.
Ah, that's what's going on - OK, we're on the same page now - it seems I
should have caught up on my entire inbox before offer
Dave Duffner - NWCWEB.com said:
>
> Last we heard from this (or another, poss. MailScanner) List
> was that SPF's are now a dead issue. Some locations are using it
> and trying to keep it alive, but even MicroWreck backed off their
> stance in supporting it.
Quite mistaken, the attempt by
Bill Ervin said:
> We currently run SA on a linux server that is maintained by a consultant
> because I am a windows server guy and know nothing about linux. It is
> setup as a relay in front of our exchange box. I am looking to
> configure it the same way for w2k.
Obviously it can't be configu
Matt Kettler said:
> At 02:05 PM 10/19/2004, Ronan wrote:
>> > (Note: antidrug is built into SA 3.0, so don't add it if you're
>> running
>> 3.0)
>> >
>>ok on that last statement - which of the rules from exit0 and
>>rulesemporium etc are included in 3.0 by default.
>>ronan
>
> From the SA 3.0 re
FWIW, Suse linux pro 9.1 is a great starting point for me, as it ships
with postfix, spamassassin, amavisd, and clamav, and saslauth, and working
well together - I merely substituted dovecot as the imap/pop3 server,
updated spamassassin to 3.0 and added maia mailguard for quarantine
management. Mai
Andrew Ott said:
>
> Amavisd-new launches spamassasin in perl form rather then use spamd.
This is true, but amavisd does load the perl spamassassin code into memory
once at startup, so it's just as fast as spamd.
> The fedora core machines running amavisd-new are both 2.4 dual xeons with
> 4gb
Upwood, Jim said:
> I'm running Mandrake 10, SA3.Xdev, I never "set" the open file value,
> where can I set this, what is the syntax, spamd is kicked off by a
> regular startup script...
I don't use mandrake, but the linux distros I'm aware of set those things
dynamically based on your system re
11 matches
Mail list logo
