prevent spamassassin from repeating previous tests

ts related to user-provided training, so that no tests are run twice? Also, do you know if there is any way to prevent the dropping of the previous run headers, so that the scoring of the current test can be summed to that of the previous? Thank you very much! Felix

SpamAssassin perceptron curiousity

have gotten sidetracked, as with all fun projects :-) I have gotten hung up on what mutable means for the code in .../masses/, and it does not seem particularly clear yet. -- ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._. Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket su

SA dbg: dkim: FAILED DKIM .. does not match author domain

Hi all, I don't understand why Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM fail on signature verification instead of opendkim success.. I see thats issues on domain which use onmicrosoft.com or gappssmtp.com Here is the mail trace on my MTA, if anybody could help me. Thx, Aug 9 10:25:42 vmail opendkim[2

Re: SA dbg: dkim: FAILED DKIM .. does not match author domain

stek-fr, a=rsa-sha256, c=relaxed/relaxed, fail, does not match author domain Thx, Le 09/08/2017 à 16:37, David Jones a écrit : > On 08/09/2017 09:33 AM, Felix Defrance wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I don't understand why Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM fail on >> signatur

Re: SA dbg: dkim: FAILED DKIM .. does not match author domain

Le 10/08/2017 à 14:46, Benny Pedersen a écrit : > RW skrev den 2017-08-10 02:06: > >> If amavis only passes part of the email to SA, it isn't going to pass >> DKIM. > > i think there is more underlaying problems there, amavisd have its own > dkim verify and signer, even if spamassassin does not s

Re: SA dbg: dkim: FAILED DKIM .. does not match author domain

Le 09/08/2017 à 18:53, David Jones a écrit : > On 08/09/2017 10:19 AM, Felix Defrance wrote: >> Do you have any idea why the body has been altered sometimes ? I >> don't have any log about amavis alterate body message. >> > > This happens when any server in the pa

Re: SA dbg: dkim: FAILED DKIM .. does not match author domain

Le 10/08/2017 à 16:33, RW a écrit : > On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:12:11 +0200 > Felix Defrance wrote: > > >> In the first lines on log, you could see opendkim results are success. >> >> Aug 9 10:25:42 vmail opendkim[21923]: 0D81A778B1D: DKIM verification >>

Plugins modifying a message

ttp://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=1833767 Is there a method to add any headers? -- Felix Schwarz

How to log negatives as well?

advance, -- Felix Natter

Re: How to log negatives as well?

ed to non-spam Mails (although "all" is specified). I know this is generally not wanted, but I'd like to enable it for testing. Is this possible? If it's not possible, then maybe the docs should be changed, something like this: "It is not possible to add headers to non-spam mails." thanks in advance, -- Felix Natter

Re: How to log negatives as well?

g a .qmail-file: |/bin/spamcheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/m2004001/popuser/ldc.de/felix.natter/Maildir/ I guess *that* makes it impossible? Is there any other way to achieve this? -- Felix Natter LDC Informationssysteme GmbH

Re: How to log negatives as well?

/dev/null) Can this be hacked to do what I want (modify non-spam mails)? thanks, -- Felix Natter LDC Informationssysteme GmbH

Filter Backscatter via DNSBL

D_IN_DNSBL_IPS_BACKSCATTERER_ORG net meta LOCAL_BACKSCATTERER_ORG ((__LOCAL_ENVELOPEFROM_BLANK || __LOCAL_ENVELOPEFROM_POSTMASTER) && RCVD_IN_DNSBL_IPS_BACKSCATTER_ORG) describe LOCAL_BACKSCATTERER_ORG Backscatter detected via ips.backscatterer.org DNSBL score LOCAL_BACKSCATTERER_ORG 10.0 Regards, Felix Buenemann

Re: Shortcurcuit scoring problem (3.2.5)

rt circuit high efficiency rules shortcircuit URIBL_BLACK spam shortcircuit URIBL_JP_SURBL spam shortcircuit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET spam shortcircuit RAZOR2_CHECK spam shortcircuit BAYES_99 spam -- Felix Crocomoth schrieb: Hello, I am using version 3.2.5 and, to reduce spam and SA footprint, turned on sh

Skip scanning for large mails

Hi, is it possible to skip scanning with spamc for large mails? (eg. > 1MB) I receive lots of huge mail (15-30MByte) on my server an the scanning takes very long for those mails, that will be ham anyways. Best Regards, Felix Buenemann

Re: Skip scanning for large mails

Andrzej Adam Filip schrieb: Felix Buenemann<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: is it possible to skip scanning with spamc for large mails? (eg.> 1MB) I receive lots of huge mail (15-30MByte) on my server an the scanning takes very long for those mails, that will be ham anyways. Bes

Re: is Pyzor worth it?

an issue on my server, because 99% of the spam is blocked by spamdyke before even accepting the mail with almost no cpu time. -- Felix Buenemann Am 14.10.2008 17:32 Uhr, Peter Nitschke schrieb: > I just added Pyzor to a server for the last 24 hours out of curiousity. > > All the spam it hit,

Re: Any other tuning tricks or is this it?

okups. > >> Also you might graylisting with a very short retry time. That can >> reduce incoming spam 20+% or so. > > We already run greylisting and envelope policies before amavis > content-filter, so our content-scanning is see only about