it squeeze from Debian.
Sam.
Le 20/03/2011 20:26, Sam a écrit :
Hi,
Some email on this list is crashing my spamassin daemon :
My server went down and I saw it was when spamd is starting to scan
for exemple the email from Matt Elson a few minutes ago.
When I start a debug with spamassassin -D &
ts of money if you fill out a short form 1.0
FORM_FRAUD Fill a form and a fraud phrase 2.0 ADVANCE_FEE_2_NEW_MONEY
Advance Fee fraud and lots of money -0.1 TXREP TXREP: Score normalizing
based on sender's reputation |
What did I do wrong? What (probably trivial) bit did I miss?
Thanks in advance.
Sam
On 4/18/19 8:19 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 18 Apr 2019, at 11:56, Sam wrote:
>> However, even with heavy spam, autolearn does not seem to engage in spam
>> mode.
> Why do you think it should?
>
> Did you check the message with spamassassin -D?
>
> You might
On 4/18/19 9:05 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 18 Apr 2019, at 12:32, Sam wrote:
>> I guess I’ll have to raise some scores to make it learn.
> Reconsider. The message was clearly marked as spam with a score more than 6
> times the threshold. There is nothing here to train, SA did its
Hi,
I run spamassassin quite fine on a debian-lenny system.
But I'm having a problem with sa-learn --spam and 1 message :
http://www.pastebin.org/48668
lenny:/home/samuel# sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 112507
RW a écrit :
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:33:14 +0100
Sam wrote:
Hi,
I run spamassassin quite fine on a debian-lenny system.
But I'm having a problem with sa-learn --spam and 1 message :
...
But Bayes still show BAYES_50 :
If you find it surprising that that can happen, you
Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:33:14 +0100
Sam wrote:
I run spamassassin quite fine on a debian-lenny system.
But I'm having a problem with sa-learn --spam and 1 message :
...
But Bayes still show BAYES_50 :
RW a écrit :
If you fi
John Hardin a écrit :
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Sam wrote:
Oct 27 00:28:24 lenny spamd[20399]: spamd: clean message (0.0/5.0)
for samueldu...@ingescom.com:102 in 4.8 seconds, 9803 bytes.
Oct 27 00:28:24 lenny spamd[20399]: spamd: result: . 0 -
BAYES_50,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08,HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_MID
RW a écrit :
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:01:39 +0100
Sam wrote:
RW a écrit :
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:33:14 +0100
If you find it surprising that that can happen, you don't understand
how Bayes works. It's a leaning system that's intended to classify
mail it hasn&
Adam Katz a écrit :
Sam wrote:
I run spamassassin quite fine on a debian-lenny system.
But I'm having a problem with sa-learn --spam and 1 message :
But Bayes still show BAYES_50 :
The Bayesian algorithm adds tokens from messages it is taught. These
tokens are then added t
John Hardin a écrit :
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Sam wrote:
John Hardin a écrit :
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Sam wrote:
> And after learning with sa-learn, it is still saying bayes_50 >
whereas sa-learn told it has learned it.
Okay, basic Bayes troubleshooting questions:
(1) Are you runn
ham. The Outlook client would send the
attached spam/ham to the correct account via custom VBA code. Has
anyone else done this and/or published how they did it?
Sam
was going to simply
tar up the mail and copy it to the gateway machine, is there a
better way?
Sam
> I observed with miltrassassin (Revision: 1.14 Date: 2003/05/28 18:43:47)
> from check_local.5.6.tar.gz formerly available at
> http://www.digitalanswers.org/check_local/check_local.5.6.tar.gz
> the following bug:
I see you mention check_local was formerly available at www.digitalanswers.org.
Is
far the best mime support of any
of them. Some of them were actually worse than the one built into clamav.
Did you happen to compare amavisd-new with ripmime? One of the nice
things about amavisd-new is that it handles unpacking the message *and*
runs fast.
- Sam Nilsson
ow that you have all seen this tagline as well. I'm pretty new to SA
and would appreciate hearing how your SA servers are blocking this one.
again v3.0.1
Thanks for the help!
- Sam Nilsson
Original Message
Date: 10 Nov 2004 18:43:48 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
al.cf
(spamassassin conf file):
skip_rbl_checks 0
dns_available yes
These network tests require that you have a network connection when you
run SA. If you don't you should try to change that. These DNSRBL tests
are key in removing almost all of my spam (as you can see from the
statistics).
- Sam Nilsson
Hi Johan,
Johan Barelds wrote:
>
> Op maandag 13 december 2004 21:08, schreef Sam Nilsson:
>
>>SpamAssassin version 3 is amazing when combined with network tests.
>>
>>These are my top tests. This shows percentage of spam that each test
>>correctly marked as su
I also use
Clamav, which I have also setup to run as the 'vscan' user.
Take Care
- Sam
s and recievers of messages marked as spam as well
as all kinds of other scoring statistics.
- Sam Nilsson
/sa/razor/pyzor/bayes/etc.). Amavisd can soft-blacklist,
blacklist, and soft-whitelist based on *envelope senders*, while SA's
black and whitelists work on message headers. SA also has the trainable
bayes engine. It all depends on what kind of features, performance,
flexibility, accuracy, etc. e
Sam Nilsson wrote:
SA still looks to its own config file (typically named local.cf) to run
and score all of its tests, it just doesn't get to rewrite the original
message.
More info here:
-- http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/
Sorry! More info here:
-- http://www.ijs.si/software/am
such ;-).
- Sam Nilsson
Hi all,
Currently, I use a procmail script to process incoming messages like so:
:0fw: spamassassin.lock
* < 256000
| /usr/bin/spamc
I noticed that although I have 5 spamd children, only one of them was getting
called at the time. Does anyone know how to process incoming mail in parallel
using p
some 'job' spam using HTML which
ordinarily we'd match if the rendered HTML text was in plain-text.
Cheers,
Sam
--
Samuel Gundry
Messaging Administrator/Developer
Information Technology Services, Monash University
Steve [Spamassasin] wrote:
> I'm familiar with razor-report, for example - but it is a real pain to
> mess about with this command line tool when all my mail is managed
> remotely over IMAP
I haven't been using spamassassin for a while, but last I check,
"spamassassin -r" will report spam to DCC
hi all
is there a definitive "RELIABLE" sa-update channel i can use to auto
update our rules ?
people on the blog are posting issues witht his --channel
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14.11.08 16:44, Sam Ami wrote:
>> is there a definitive "RELIABLE" sa-update channel i can use to auto
>> upd
hi all
our current setup.
primary mx for all out email domains installation: qmail,spamassasin,clamav
all email is inline scanned and then relayed to the internal server
for delivery to users mailbox
question.
is it possible to use sa-learn in this situtation ?
we still get a lot of spam and i'd
vailable version=3.1.0
...
From the header checked mail, the score is only 1.2 for a learned spam
mail !?
What's wrong ?
Sam.
--
Ce message a été vérifié par MailScanner
pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
suspect n'a été trouvé.
Hi,
Is it possible to export a Bayes DB from a server and then append (not
restore) it to others servers ?
Sam.
--
Ce message a été vérifié par MailScanner
pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
suspect n'a été trouvé.
Michael Parker a écrit :
Sam Przyswa wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to export a Bayes DB from a server and then append (not
restore) it to others servers ?
No, you generally can't combine two bayes databases that way. Best bet
is to pick the most complete one and use it.
For
IP RBLs and
I see RHSRBL, but I don't see domain-based RBLs that check the connecting
machine.
Thanks,
sam
the email address in the envelope. What I'd like is a way
to take the hostname that is the last received header and look that up,
just as its currently looking up the IP address.
sam
34 matches
Mail list logo
