On 17/11/2024 11:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 2024-11-16 at 16:48:49 UTC-0500 (Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:48:49 +)
Nick Howitt
is rumored to have said:
My set up is Debian 12 with their packaged amavis, postfix,
spamassassin, clamav and postfix-policyd-spf-python.
On 17.11.24 09
On 17/11/2024 11:39, Damian wrote:
I am somewhat certain those two lines are related and that the
"invalid DKIM result" is `invalid` verbatim.
Mail::DKIM::Verifier creates a signature with a result `invalid` for
ed25519, Amavis passes all signatures to SpamAssassin,
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plu
On 19/11/2024 10:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
The point of the big ugly error message is to have a big ugly error
message. MOST people who report problems with SA accuracy here have
misconfigured their resolvers, apparently because they don't trust
documentation or don't read it.
Not
On 20/11/2024 12:55, Nix wrote:
On 19 Nov 2024, Greg Troxel told this:
Matija Nalis writes:
From
https://knowledge.validity.com/s/articles/Accessing-Validity-reputation-data-through-DNS
:
Starting March 1, 2024, Validity will allow up to 10,000 requests to
anonymous users over a 3
On 20/11/2024 16:39, Nix wrote:
On 20 Nov 2024, Nick Howitt uttered the following:
On 20/11/2024 12:55, Nix wrote:
On 19 Nov 2024, Greg Troxel told this:
Matija Nalis writes:
From
https://knowledge.validity.com/s/articles/Accessing-Validity-reputation-data-through-DNS
On 20/11/2024 17:07, Nix wrote:
On 19 Nov 2024, Matija Nalis stated:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 05:21:12PM +, Nix wrote:
I'm not a high-volume site, a few thousand mails a day. If I'm blocked,
probably more or less everyone is being blocked. (Are the DNSBLs above
Yes, pretty much every n
On 19/11/2024 13:53, Greg Troxel wrote:
Matija Nalis writes:
Fromhttps://knowledge.validity.com/s/articles/Accessing-Validity-reputation-data-through-DNS
:
Starting March 1, 2024, Validity will allow up to 10,000 requests to
anonymous users over a 30-day period.
10k requests per 30-da
The RBL's check the referring DNS Server. if you use someone like
OpenDNS or GoogleDNS, as many others do then, as far as the RBL list is
concernet it is receiving too many queries via those DNS servers.
If you want to use these RBL's, it is recommended you run your own
recursive DNS server ra
Hi,
I am just going through my mail logs and I am seeing a lot of:
_WARN: plugin: eval failed: invalid DKIM result at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/DMARC.pm line 107.
My set up is Debian 12 with their packaged amavis, postfix,
spamassassin, clamav and postfix-policyd-spf-python.
Should I be c
On 16/11/2024 23:12, Bill Cole wrote:
On 2024-11-16 at 16:48:49 UTC-0500 (Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:48:49 +)
Nick Howitt
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
I am just going through my mail logs and I am seeing a lot of:
_WARN: plugin: eval failed: invalid DKIM result at
/usr/share
Hi,
I'm using SpamAssassin v3.3.1-3 on ClearOS 6.7 (a CentOS derivative)
and I believe it is invoked by amavis-new. I have a whitelist line
in local.cf:
whitelist_from *@avivaemail.co.uk @m.avivaemail.co.uk
*@tomtom.com *@dpd.co.uk *@clearos.com *@peacocks-mail.com
On 24/05/2016 18:11, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 18:49 schrieb Nick Howitt:
Hi,
I'm using SpamAssassin v3.3.1-3 on ClearOS 6.7 (a CentOS
derivative) and
I believe it is invok
On 24/05/2016 19:11, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Nick Howitt:
http://uribl.com/refused.shtml
Thanks for the link. I use OpenDNS and it looks like it is being
On 24/05/2016 20:53, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:44 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 24/05/2016 19:11, Reindl Harald
wrote
On 24/05/2016 21:28, Benny Pedersen
wrote:
On 2016-05-24 21:40, Nick Howitt wrote:
Ok, but how does it help me? From what
I've read it seems dnsmasq can
only do recursion. If I keep dnsmasq then I
On 24/05/2016 21:30, Benny Pedersen
wrote:
On 2016-05-24 21:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
no-resolv
strict-order
server=208.67.222.222
server=208.67.222.220
This thread is so fragmented now I am not sure which message to reply to.
I've now installed unbound and configured dnsmasq to hand its DNS
queries to unbound on port 1053. It looks like I could stop dnsmasq from
doing dns completely (by setting port to 0), but the ClearOS webconfig
interfaces
and what is the problem run a local unbound on port 1053 and just add
"dns_server [127.0.0.1]:1053" to your SA-configuration when one thinks
he is capable to run his own servers?
I've tried looking and failed. Any chance of pointing me to where this
is documented?
something else. Thanks for mentioning unbound
I had never heard of this before.
____
From: Nick Howitt
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:11:24 AM
To: David Jones; SA-Users
Subject: Re: Odd results when using whitelisting
This thread is so fragmented now I am not sur
On 26/05/2016 00:29, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 25.05.2016 um 21:58 schrieb Nick Howitt:
and what is the problem run a local
unbound on port 1053 and just add
"dns_server [127.0.0.1]:105
Please don't treat me like a numpty. I am not. Head over to the ClearOS
forums and look for nickh and see how I respond to all sorts of people
from beginners upwards asking for help.
Am 26.05.2016 um 08:17 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 26/05/2016 00:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.05.2016 u
OK, I've been heavily shot at for my set up which is totally
irrelevant to the question I posed and not a pleasant experience. Is
there any possibility of some help with the problem I posted about?
Matus snuck in the most likely answer a while back - message size.
In Amavis it look as if the
On 26/05/2016 13:19, Nick Howitt wrote:
OK, I've been heavily shot at for my set up which is totally
irrelevant to the question I posed and not a pleasant experience. Is
there any possibility of some help with the problem I posted about?
Matus snuck in the most likely answer a while
headers.
Nick
On 26/05/2016 07:17, Nick Howitt wrote:
On 26/05/2016 00:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.05.2016 um 21:58 schrieb Nick Howitt:
and what is the problem run a local unbound on port 1053 and just add
"dns_server [127.0.0.1]:1053" to your SA-configuration when one thinks
he
On 07/04/2025 12:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
"Simon Wilson" writes:
My results (about 1800 inbound emails across 6 days) show:
* combination of postscreen and other upstream tests are catching
true baddies enough that the VALIDITY_RPBL does not catch any for me
* VALIDITY_SAFE and
On 13/02/2025 20:16, Richard Doyle wrote:
On 2/13/25 10:25 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
wissen.online | Stefan Mehlhorn skrev den 2025-02-13 19:02:
Hi Benny, Hi Levine,
tnx! Wissen.online it also the name of our company ... so we need .online
and not wissenonline.de (ist another company)
stop
26 matches
Mail list logo
