On 2020/10/25 07:58, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
This sounds like a path issue and you have two versions of SA
installed.
Yeah, sorta.
One perhaps from a package manager like yum or apt and
another from cpan.
Both by me, but I didn't know the "sa-" ignored
where the
One thing to be aware of. There is no 1st Amendment Right associated
with any business entity or private person. The guarantees apply to
US government and whether or not they can censor what you say.
I would suspect governments use something more advanced than SA that costs
thousands of times m
spamassas...@linkcheck.co.uk wrote:
The code below is found in several places online and for some months I
have been trying to get it to work, but whatever I do it flags up Fail
even if the source is good. Typically I have been concentrating on
gmail: from known good contacts I always get NOT
My old email service was bought out by Megapath who is letting alot of
services
slide.
My main issue is that my incoming email scripts follow the SMTP RFC's and if
the sender address isn't valid, then it's not a valid email that should be
forwarded.
My script simply check for the domain exist
Alex wrote:
Hi,
> The only response my ISP will give is to turn on their spam
filtering. I tried that.
> In about a 2 hour time frame, over 400 messages were blocked as spam.
Of those less
> than 10 were actually spam, the rest were from various lists.
>
> So having them censoring my incomi
Mark Martinec wrote:
Reindl Harald wrote:
no custom body rules hit like they do for ISO/UTF8 :-(
What is your normalize_charsets setting?
The problem with this message is that it declares encoding
as UTF-16, i.e. not explicitly stating endianness like
UTF-16BE or UTF-16LE, and there is no
Have a different question -- and I feel a bit embarrassed to ask this but
it isn't obvious from the manpage.
What type of Regular Expressions go into the the white/black list entries?
filename type RE's (what I thought more people would be familiar with, but
on further thought, didn't really make
Matt Kettler wrote:
(That said, if you're a sysadmin I'd strongly suggest learning basic regex
syntax. "grep" and many other command-line sysadmin tools become so much more
powerful if you know how to create a regex.)
Actually, I know sed/[e]grep/bash{2,3} et al. RE's, just need to
Matt Kettler wrote:
Linda A. Walsh wrote:
Actually, I know sed/[e]grep/bash{2,3} et al. RE's, just need to know
which syntax is supported, i.e. old "sh", bash2 compatible, bash3
(w/iterators),
sed compat RE's, grep (w/POSIX support), egrep (w/alternation)...etc.
FW
sa-learn --spam --progress -L --mbox Junk.tmp
100% [===] 6.86 msgs/sec
01m13s DONE
Learned tokens from 427 message(s) (506 message(s) examined)
6.86 msgs/sec? Wazup? Used to take about a tenth of that time, though
it did jump up in 3.0x over 2.6x.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linda A. Walsh wrote:
6.86 msgs/sec? Wazup? Used to take about a tenth of that time,
though
it did jump up in 3.0x over 2.6x. But 7 msgs/second? That seems
abysmally slow compared to previous runtimes. Might as well be
running on a 286. (2x1GHz P-III
11 matches
Mail list logo
