This spam went through with a score of 0. I'm using 3.01 with most of the
sare rulesets. Any ideas on how to catch these?
Thanks,
Jerry
http://www.syslog.org
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:53:39 -0500
R
I'm using SA through exim/exiscan, and I've got it set up to only report
if it is spam. Guess I should change that.
The SA logs showing it getting a score of 0. SA is working really well
for me the other 99% of the time.
Jerry
> Jerry Bell wrote:
>> This spam went throug
I wonder if my bayes db has been poisoned to the point of thinking this is
ham? In the logs, it autolearned this one as ham, so I suspect that may
be the case.
> Jerry Bell wrote:
>> I'm using SA through exim/exiscan, and I've got it set up to only report
>> if it is spa
hanks for the help!
It looks like its in the whitelist and scoring low in bayes.
> Jerry Bell wrote:
>> I wonder if my bayes db has been poisoned to the point of thinking this
>> is
>> ham? In the logs, it autolearned this one as ham, so I suspect that may
>> be the
1. This can be done really effectively using SPF. I believe spamassassin
can use spf, and most MTA's can too. I highly recommend it. You would
not believe the number of viruses that get turned away by using SPF. It
seems that many of the recent ones send mails to a target domain with a
from add
There's a big review of anti-spam products at nw fusion here:
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2004/122004spampkg.html?ts
Here's a bit on spamassassin:
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2004/122004spamside6.html
It's a pretty disappointing article.
Jerry
http://www.syslog.org
nterprise-focused vendors."
They do talk favorably of spamassassin in a few parts, but overall they
seemed to have missed the boat.
Jerry
http://www.syslog.org
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 10:41:33AM -0500, Jerry Bell wrote:
>> Here's a bit on spamassassin:
>> http://www.nwfu
I'm running 3.1.3 on a FreeBSD server. I just found out about sa-update
which looks like a great tool. My question is this: how can I take
advantage of the updated configs? The problem that I see is that Freebsd
uses completely non standard directories for everything, so I don't have
much confi
> You don't need to include the directory. SA will automatically use it
> if it exists. Run SA in debug mode to see which directory it uses.
>
> spamassassin -D config --lint
Looks like I need to have a little more faith in the developers :)
Thanks!
Jerry
I'm not the authority on such things, but I don't believe it's possible
without some customization.
I really wanted to ask you, though, how you handle mail rejection on the
"inner" layer of mail servers? If mail gets through your front end SA box
and needs to be rejected because it's to an invali
10 matches
Mail list logo
