SA 3.02 - How to relocate auto-whitelist, bayes_journal, bayes_seen and bayes_toks to another device?

I know this might seem like an odd request for those of you with tons of disk space available so please be kind. I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.0.2. For server space reasons (I'm a user on this system not root), I need to relocate auto-whitelist, bayes_journal, bayes_seen and bayes_toks whi

Re: SA 3.02 - How to relocate auto-whitelist, bayes_journal, bayes_seen and bayes_toks to another device?

On Feb 18, 2005, at 2:38 PM, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote: David A. Roth wrote: I know this might seem like an odd request for those of you with tons of disk space available so please be kind. I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.0.2. For server space reasons (I'm a user on this system no

SpamAssassin: could not report spam to SpamCop.

SA has been making e-mail great! Thanks to those who invented and continue to work on it!!! I'm using SA 3.02 on Red Hat Linux release 7.3 with Perl v5.6.1 built for i686-linux When I do the following command, I get this error message: % cat spam.mbox | spamassassin -r --mbox -D SpamCop -> repo

Web hosting ISP runs Spamassassin, but not razor.

I was running spamassassin for the last couple of years on web site. The previous ISP didn't run Spamassassin, so I installed it myself. Now I am using a new web hosting provider (bluehost.com) and they support spamassassin. Users can access some of its features through a control panel. Howev

Re: Web hosting ISP runs Spamassassin, but not razor.

Thanks for your reply. So far they have not been interested in changing anything I requested. (They refused to disable the X-popbeforeSMTP thing which lists every known e-mail address of the sender in all outgoing headers.) I thought I would ask here since there might be something simple to do

SA as a plug-in for Apple Mail?

While the junk mail filter on Apple Mail is ok, SA is much better. Is there a way to run SA on the Mac OS X where the Apple Mail client can make use of SA? Thanks! David Roth rothmail (at) comcast (dot) net

Re: collaborative bayes bases

If I am understanding this correctly...the concern is that the Bayes should match the mail server in which the ham and spam was received on only? David Roth rothmail (at) comcast.net (dot) net On Nov 18, 2005, at 5:10 AM, qMax wrote: in wiki://BayesInSpamAssassin it is said: Do not train Bay

Re: collaborative bayes bases

I see. That's a very good point, about sharing the Bayes within a different community. Anyone see a problem with a single-user collecting spam (and ham) from various personal mailboxes that came in from different internet service providers and doing a sa-learn on it? David Roth rothmail (at)