HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS

2021-09-10 Thread Chad
smime.p7m Description: S/MIME encrypted message

Emails from gmail.com bypassing Spamassassin scoring

2022-02-07 Thread Chad
smime.p7m Description: S/MIME encrypted message

Re: Emails from gmail.com bypassing Spamassassin scoring

2022-02-07 Thread Chad
smime.p7m Description: S/MIME encrypted message

Re: Emails from gmail.com bypassing Spamassassin scoring

2022-02-07 Thread Chad
larger than that size will not be passed to SA (IE it will skip scanning). Does your MTA log the SA processing? Can you see any logged errors associated with that particular message? On Mon, 7 Feb 2022, Chad wrote: > All of the other emails that were sent before and after this particular em

Unsubscribe

2022-05-10 Thread Chad
On May 10, 2022, at 9:16 PM, Bill Cole wrote: On 2022-05-10 at 18:10:23 UTC-0400 (Tue, 10 May 2022 16:10:23 -0600) Philip Prindeville is rumored to have said: > Anyone have a rule to detect the following nonsense headers seen in this > message I got? No, and complicating your circumstance

Inconsistent Spam scores?

2005-11-23 Thread Chad
ter subject line with (see above) rewrite_header Subject [SPAM] # This setting is to display the email address to contact for assistance report_contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] # This setting is to set the desired language allowed ok_languages en # report_safe 1 trusted_networks 192.168.1.1 sa version: spamassassin --version SpamAssassin version 3.0.2 running on Perl version 5.8.6 And procmail version: procmail v3.22 Thanks! Chad

Fwd: Inconsistent Spam scores?

2005-11-23 Thread Chad
Missed including the list on the return ;) -- Forwarded message -- From: Chad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Nov 23, 2005 7:31 PM Subject: Re: Inconsistent Spam scores? To: jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 11/23/05, jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You need to setup

Re: Inconsistent Spam scores?

2005-11-24 Thread Chad
eep you updated. Thanks for the help so far! Chad

Re: Inconsistent Spam scores?

2005-11-24 Thread Chad
On 11/24/05, Chad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Disabling, and checking. > > I've been going over this thing on and off all night. So far, the > best change I made was the internal_networks > > It seems to work *almost* correctly now, but, as you noted, it seems >

Added ISP as relayhost, now mail is coming in with FORGED_RCVD_HELO

2005-12-04 Thread Chad
to relayhost = smtp.comcast.net I send email to a mail list, that in turn, sends the email to me, and this is where I see this info. As a complication to add to all of the above, the mail list server is my backup mx server. Thanks! Chad

Re: Added ISP as relayhost, now mail is coming in with FORGED_RCVD_HELO

2005-12-04 Thread Chad
On 12/4/05, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 09:19 PM 12/4/2005, Chad wrote: > >Evenin! > > > >I have been reading on relays, and such. I am in a situation where a > >user on my system sends mail to AOL, but AOL blocks email from dynamic > >IP

Re: List of subjects of most common spams?

2005-12-30 Thread Chad
little personal setup, so there's only a few of us using it, which really makes it good for me (easy to customize and find plugins I need or write them easily enough). For my mail lists I use gmail because it's a lot easier to use to sort them with their labels, plus it's nice to search the archives in a universal form. Chad

script / modules ver. inconsistent

2006-07-27 Thread Chad Riden
ut most recently used CPAN to update to SpamAssassin 3.1.3. Everything seems to be working really well, however 'spamassassin --lint' reports: spamassassin: spamassassin script is v3.001002, but using modules v3.001003 Did I err? What do I need to do to fix this? Thanks fo

Re: Recent spate of Malicious VB attachments II

2015-02-19 Thread Chad M Stewart
obal.net > > Received trace: ESMTP://[23.113.51.23]:56334 > > Return-Path: > From: > Message-ID: <048678970043189683240541243784...@csis.dk> > Subject: Attention csis > The message has been quarantined as: banned-T9Uh2zuM5Ym6 > > The message WAS NOT relayed to: > : >250 2.7.0 ok, discarded, id=90515-05 - banned: .exe,.exe-ms,in.exe > > -Chad smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

different scores - spamd vs spamassassin

2004-11-11 Thread Chad M Stewart
on-token data: nspam 0.000 0161 0 non-token data: nham Again I'm at a loss as to why this might have happened. I'd really like to hear from some experts as to what it is that is going wrong here or might be. Thank you for your time, Chad smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

sa-learn -- Memory fault

2004-11-24 Thread Chad M Stewart
nnoying problem? I've got 5K+ of old junk mail messages to train SA with. Hard to do when it won't complete. Thanks, Chad smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: sa-learn -- Memory fault

2004-11-25 Thread Chad M Stewart
l RET break 0 12788 perl PSIG SIGSEGV SIG_DFL code 1 addr=0x35386534 trapno=1 12788 perl PSIG SIGSEGV SIG_DFL code 0 addr=0x0 trapno=0 # -Chad smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

claims "no rules found" but I have run sa-update

2012-04-24 Thread Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC
ish_parsing_end', priority 0 Apr 25 00:26:06.391 [64987] dbg: replacetags: replacing tags Apr 25 00:26:06.391 [64987] dbg: replacetags: done replacing tags Apr 25 00:26:06.391 [64987] dbg: FreeMail: no freemail_domains entries defined, disabling plugin config: no rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'? at /usr/public/bin/spamassassin line 403. -- Thanks Chad

Re: claims "no rules found" but I have run sa-update

2012-04-25 Thread Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC
On Apr 25, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 4/25/2012 2:38 AM, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote: >> I have SA 3.3.2 installed on FreeBSD 9. This was installed from "source" >> and not the package or port. I have some different requirements and so built >

Solved! Re: claims "no rules found" but I have run sa-update

2012-04-25 Thread Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC
On Apr 25, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote: > > I have SA 3.3.2 installed on FreeBSD 9. This was installed from "source" and > not the package or port. I have some different requirements and so built it > myself. > > I run a bunch of FreeBSD