tly off to SpamAssassin? For me, at least, that would
eliminate almost all of the spam my server is receiving - Mozilla spots
it instantly, but SpamAssassin is missing at least half.
Troy Belding
Bookworm Computing
Jo wrote:
Bookworm wrote:
I've read through the archives several times, and hoped that over the
last year or so someone would build the functionality, or at least
mention it one way or another - I haven't seen it.
Is there any way to take an already trained Mozilla bayes structure
a
Stuart Johnston wrote:
Here is a project that will export the Mozilla Bayes tokens which
would at least be the first step. I'm not sure how hard it would be
to then import them into SA.
http://bayesjunktool.mozdev.org/
Wonderful! Thank you very much. I'll see about exporting my Mozilla
baye
List Mail User wrote:
JohnS,
As many of the regulars on this list can tell you, I *hate* spam
as much as nearly anyone here; But... Mike is absolutely correct, what
they have done is "slimely", but is not for most purposes "spam" (IANAL).
It is UCE (unsolicited commercial email),
List Mail User wrote:
To NOT be "spam" and be *cough* condoned UCE, it must
1) Tell you that you're going to get it when you sign up; or
1a) Send you a notification that you are now being signed up for it.
(Southwestern Bell doesn't seem to do this either, btw. They created a
new list and sig
Bowie Bailey wrote:
From: Ben Wylie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Currently I am running my mailserver on a windows box. I have just bought
a new server and will probably be running CentOS on it. I would like to
migrate my mailserver onto this linux box so that hopefully I will be able
to get a fas
Mike Jackson wrote:
A couple days ago, I set up AOL's "feedback loop" (though the loop
part is a misnomer, since you can't actually respond to the messages)
so I could monitor complaints against my employer's servers. Looking
through the messages AOL says their members reported as spam, I
notic
List Mail User wrote:
Follow the trail; Chris Terrebonne's "NFP Inc." - snakeoil and
spam/scammers of Slidell, LA - (985) 726-0928. They've been around a very
long time (domains change weekly, but a few constants like remain
conradpromotions. com, rednecks. com and myownemail.com). Th
Tim Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2005 20:48:26 -0400
"Eric Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[on Fedora Core 1]
2. What is the easiest way to update Net::DNS to 0.34 ?
This was very easy:
perl -MCPAN -e shell[as root]
o conf prerequisites_policy ask
Has anyone written a new startup script for Slackware? I hacked up a
kludge that does the job, but it's not very good.
BW
Most of the email I'm trying to run sa-learn on is owned by vpopmail,
and my spamassassin runs as the user 'spamd'.
Even when I try sa-learn -u spamd, it continually learns as 'root' -
filling a bayes database in the root directory.
Is there anyway to stop this? I REALLY don't want to have t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Irina wrote:
I decided to downgrade it by downloading TAR. Installed
prerequisites and the module itself just fine.
Running spamassassin --lint and see the complaint about version of it
is not numeric (0.49_03), therefore it can not compare 2 versions
Argument "
Mike Cisar wrote:
Hi All,
A bit off topic since the users are all unknown so the traffic never makes
it to my spamassassin. But I am hoping that someone here may have seen the
same thing and have a solution for making the problem "go-away" :-)
I'm not sure whether it's supposed to be a DDOS at
Cedartech Administrator wrote:
I have asked before but have been unable to get a usable solution. I am
running qmail, spamassassin, clamav, etc from the qmr package on one of
our FBSD 6.2 servers. If you email via squirrelmail, your outbound email
does not get labeled spam. If you send out via
Joseph Brennan wrote:
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
since the server rejects unknown recipients right away.
Here too, but it eats nearly 100% of System- and CPU-Resources...
It might be worth looking for a couple of addresses that get hit
repeatedly and temporarily activating
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
--mbox
Specify that the input message(s) are in mbox format.
mbox is a standard Unix message folder format.
[...]
To pick a very small nit - 'mbox' isn't referring to a folder. It's a
file.
'maildir' could be called a folder format.
According to the Netcraft News for March, 2008, they showed some
interesting growth in Blogspot.
"Google increases its developer share by gaining 842 thousand hostnames;
most of which are used for blogspot.com blogs."
I wonder how many of those 842,000 blogspot.com blogs were autocreated
spa
Bowie Bailey wrote:
R.Smits wrote:
Hello,
Is there something I can do that our company addresses cannot be used
for sending spam ? Is DKIM an answer ?
A lot of our users get "delivery failed" messages. So a spammer is
sending spam with our addresses :-(
A difficult problem I think ?
Greeti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that analyzes and scores email addresses:
we have big companies that give their employees more or less random strings as
email addresses
(but length will not be extremely long)
Otherwise we have email addresses that somehow are built from a person's name,
(e.g firs
Ole Nomann Thomsen wrote:
Den 15.08.2006 kl. 12:01 skrev Andreas Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
While I don't really see why ldap isn't an option, even with an 99%
load, callout might be the solution.
However, I don't run qmail but here's how it works with exim
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-
Matt Kettler wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:01:20AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
The moral here is NEVER use whitelist_from.
...does this indicate that whitelist_from should be obsoleted?
should, yes.. will be, probably no
Robert Swan wrote:
These guys are having lots of trouble sending email to people, they are
using an exchange 2003 server and are not listed on any SPAM database
anywhere, per.. http://www.dnsstuff.com/
Robert
They may be using an Exchange Server for actually forwarding emails out,
but it loo
Shahzad Abid wrote:
Dear Ed Kasky
Thanks for such a nice suggetion and guidance currently I am using qtrap
for my Qmail Server.
Is there any other tool available ?
Shahzad Abid
You obviously haven't read the information on qmail-scanner. If you
add the ST patch to qmail-scanner, you can
should probably use the
same default site rules directory as sa-update?)
Bookworm
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Bookworm wrote:
When I build SpamAssassin using the CPAN method, it installs the
test files (20_anti_ratware.cf and similar) in
/usr/share/spamassassin.
However, sa-update shoves updates into
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001005/updates_spamassassin_org (with extra
crap in
Christopher Martin wrote:
And, lastly, as much as US citizens hate to hear it, .org is NOT a US
domain, .org.us is. The .com, .org, etc domains are international domains.
The convention of assuming that the non country coded domains are US domains
is simply a result of American hubris. It would a
Jo Rhett wrote:
Bookworm wrote:
Just as a FYI, .com, .org, .edu, .mil, .gov, and .net were developed
by the US when DNS was first being conceptualized. There were
enough computers on the (D)ARPNET backbone that it was getting
confusing to track hosts files. At that point, there wasn
I'm starting to see some new phishing/scam attempts.
What I was thinking was that it might be worthwhile to add a rule to not
so much check links, but count periods.
Here's the example that just came in my email -
(removing http:// ) -
connect.colonialbank.webbizcompany.c6b5r64whf623lx426xq
I'm starting to see some new phishing/scam attempts.
What I was thinking was that it might be worthwhile to add a rule to not
so much check links, but count periods.
I was going to put in the web address that I received as an example, but I think
that's why this is a second attempt - the first
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Bookworm wrote:
I'm starting to see some new phishing/scam attempts.
What I was thinking was that it might be worthwhile to add a rule to not
so much check links, but count periods.
I was going to put in the web address that I received as an example,
but I think t
Bill Randle wrote:
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 11:17 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Trying to do something that should be simple. Using sed to remove the
first part of a hostname but not working. I want:
abc.def.com to become def.com
I tried a lot of variations of the following but it's either greedy
Christoph Petersen wrote:
Hey guys,
got some strange problem during my vacation the last week. For once it seems
that the network stack of SA crashed so no new processes could be spawned or
that the spamd crashed and blocked the port. The second problem looks very
cryptic to me maybe some Perl g
Pick up a pen, and write to your local congressman, or even to the SEC,
and insist that they penalize those companies who are being pimped and
pumped through spam emails.
Today, I got one for Mobicom Communications. If that company had their
chance to go public yanked, you could be sure that
Coffey, Neal wrote:
Bookworm wrote:
Pick up a pen, and write to your local congressman, or even to the
SEC, and insist that they penalize those companies who are being
pimped and pumped through spam emails.
Why should they? The companies being advertised in the stock spams
aren&#
Robert Braver wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2006, 8:00:09 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
MS> It was $500, and the law changed to make it impossible to collect
MS> anymore.
MS> Before, it was a 'first strike' and you owe $500. Now you have to 'opt
MS> out' (they can still send you one)
Opt-ou
just about any
other mail provider. (most hosting companies are CRAP for filtering).
Bookworm Computing
John Tice wrote:
I am always amazed to hear how much gets through on corporate systems.
My wife works in a corporate office with a dedicated IT department and
she says 60-70% of their total received is spam. I would think that
number to be intolerable. For instance, I have a VPS and host abou
Adam Wilbraham wrote:
To follow up on this, the message in question is flagged as spam if i
run it through spamassassin, however if I run it through spamc its not.
spamc is what Qmail Scanner invokes. Is there a separate configuration
for spamc / spamd to spamassassin? I thought not...
It sound
Adam Wilbraham wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:22:13 -0600
Bookworm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It sounds like you have the spamd bayes database, and then you have
the database for whatever user you're actually running the test
from. I ran into this problem as well - it's a kn
John Rudd wrote:
Spam Assassin wrote:
Why was this topic not started on the SPF list? Was the original
poster of
this topic looking to get MORE attention on the SpamAssassin list?
Whether you and the other amateur-topic-police* like it or not, the
subject is related to the more general subj
40 matches
Mail list logo
