Hi!
I switched from 3.4.6 to 4.0.0-rc3 last week and since then I experience
unexpected/missing results from meta rules which definitely worked on 3.4.6.
I noticed it especially on one large meta rule which "summarizes" the
results using "+", "&&", "||" and ">". Since SA4 did not complain abo
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 12:50:38AM +0200, Wolfgang Breyha wrote:
>
> And another quite simple ruleset...
> meta __SA4TA3_1 6
> meta __SA4TA3_2 2
> meta __SA4TA3(__SA4TA3_1 > 2) && (__SA4TA3_2 > 1)
> doesn't set __SA4TA3. This was working an SA3.4 as well.
Works fine here.
> Is this wanted b
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 12:50:38AM +0200, Wolfgang Breyha wrote:
>
> In case of URIBL_SBL I don't know why it gets undefined, since other RBLs
> work in the same place (eg. URIBL_BLACK) as expected and the result is 1.
Thanks for the tip, found the problem. Should be fixed in rc4.
https://bz.apa
KAM channel (https://mcgrail.com/template/kam.cf_channel) users might want
to check their rules..
KAM_deadweight2_sub.cf contains this:
meta __RCVD_IN_SORBS 0
meta __RCVD_IN_ZEN 0
meta __RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_B 0
meta __RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L 0
meta __RCVD_IN_DNSWL 0
Seems it's been disabling many active a
