I used to greylist and it helped a lot.
2FA killed that, however. When someone logs into a website, bank, etc
quite often they use an email address as the second factor - so for that
to work the email has to be delivered instantaneously. Also most 2FA
does not follow any kind of SMTP standard
On 2022-05-07 02:39, Greg Troxel wrote:
I agree with what Grant said.
Also, I wonder how much greylisting would help, and if you were already
doing that. The data I posted is for a machine that already does
greylisting in general, with varying times depending on inclusion in
various RBLs and lo
On 2022-05-07 09:55, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Once 2FA became a big deal for the banks I got far too many user
complaints on the greylisting to keep it.
2fa should NOT be done on email
idiotic banks :)
On 5/7/22 1:55 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I used to greylist and it helped a lot.
I used to use grey listing too. I've found no listing to be equally
effective.
2FA killed that, however. When someone logs into a website, bank,
etc quite often they use an email address as the second facto
I have set up SpamAssassin with the following in
/etc/spamassassin/mycustomscores.cf:
score RCVD_IN_SBL 10.0
score RCVD_IN_XBL 10.0
score RCVD_IN_PBL 10.0
score RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS 10.0
score URIBL_SBL 10.0
score URIBL_CSS 10.0
score URIBL_CSS_A 10.0
score U
On 2022-05-07 16:42, Paul Pace wrote:
I have set up SpamAssassin with the following in
/etc/spamassassin/mycustomscores.cf:
* 10 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus SBL
* blocklist
* [URIs: wikileaksdotorg]
add to /etc/spamassassin/myc
On 2022-05-06 6:56 am, Henrik K wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 12:31:47PM +0200, giovanni@paclan.itwrote:
> On 5/6/22 11:08, Niels Kobschätzki wrote: Hi, I have a setup where the
> spamassassin-servers have actually no access to the data of the mail-servers.
> Now I was looking into having
On 2022-05-07 07:53, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2022-05-07 16:42, Paul Pace wrote:
I have set up SpamAssassin with the following in
/etc/spamassassin/mycustomscores.cf:
* 10 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus SBL
* blocklist
* [URIs: wik
> >I'm trying to understand why some domains are not whitelisted even
> >though they pass SPF and are in my local welcomelist_auth entries. I'm
> >using policyd-spf with postfix, and it appears to be adding the
> >following header:
> >
> >X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay domain -
> >cli
On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 09:35:31AM -0700, Paul Pace wrote:
> On 2022-05-07 07:53, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > On 2022-05-07 16:42, Paul Pace wrote:
> > > * 10 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus SBL
> > > * blocklist
> > > * [URIs: wikileaksdotorg]
>
> The prob
On 2022-05-07 10:37, Matija Nalis wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 09:35:31AM -0700, Paul Pace wrote:
On 2022-05-07 07:53, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2022-05-07 16:42, Paul Pace wrote:
> > * 10 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus SBL
> > * blocklist
> >
11 matches
Mail list logo
