Re: Workflow for adding new ham/spam to existing site-wide database?

2021-03-18 Thread Brent Clark
Are you able to submit your spam to PCC / KAM. That way the community as a whole  can be benefit. Regards Brent On 2021/03/16 19:16, Steve Dondley wrote: I have been accumulating spam/ham samples and sorting them out into different directories on my server. As new spam/ham comes in, I throw it

Re: Workflow for adding new ham/spam to existing site-wide database?

2021-03-18 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:42:14 -0400 Kris Deugau wrote: My own experience has been that accumulating blobs of ham/spam and just repeatedly running sa-learn over those works just fine. It also reduces the incidence of tokens from somewhat rarer mail automatically expiring out of Bayes, leading to

Re: Workflow for adding new ham/spam to existing site-wide database?

2021-03-18 Thread Kris Deugau
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:42:14 -0400 Kris Deugau wrote: My own experience has been that accumulating blobs of ham/spam and just repeatedly running sa-learn over those works just fine.  It also reduces the incidence of tokens from somewhat rarer mail automatically ex

Re: Workflow for adding new ham/spam to existing site-wide database?

2021-03-18 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:42:14 -0400 Kris Deugau wrote: My own experience has been that accumulating blobs of ham/spam and just repeatedly running sa-learn over those works just fine.  It also reduces the incidence of tokens from somewhat rarer mail automatically expiring out of Bayes, leading to F

Re: Workflow for adding new ham/spam to existing site-wide database?

2021-03-18 Thread RW
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:01:28 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:42:14 -0400 Kris Deugau wrote: > > >> My own experience has been that accumulating blobs of ham/spam and > >> just repeatedly running sa-learn over those works just fine. It > >> also reduces the inciden

Re: Workflow for adding new ham/spam to existing site-wide database?

2021-03-18 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:42:14 -0400 Kris Deugau wrote: >> My own experience has been that accumulating blobs of ham/spam and >> just repeatedly running sa-learn over those works just fine. It >> also reduces the incidence of tokens from somewhat rarer mail >> automatically expiring out of Bayes,