Re: Why is RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET not '-lastexternal'?

2018-07-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 28.07.18 17:06, RW wrote: >I don't see anything on the site to suggest that it avoids listing >dynamic IP addresses. And here: > > https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/357.html > >commenting on listing history it says: > > > "One also has to remember that IP addresses change hands. Many IS

Re: Issues with Yahoo/AOL emails and RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO

2018-07-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 12:28:08 +0200 Antony Stone wrote: On Sunday 29 July 2018 at 12:17:07, Sebastian Arcus wrote yet another email that's guaranteed to fail DMARC with a reject when posted through a mailing list, and consequently I didn't receive: > Or maybe I am misunderstanding completely

Re: Why is RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET not '-lastexternal'?

2018-07-30 Thread RW
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 11:58:48 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 28.07.18 18:13, RW wrote: > >Most -lastexternal lists are mixed dynamic/static. Deep checks should > >be, and mostly are, list for exploitable servers or IP addresses > >under the control of spammers (or very spam friendly ISPs)