On 03/05/2018 06:57 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:59 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote:
To: =?utf-8?Q?DermotO=27reilly?=
* 2.6 APOSTROPHE_TOCC To or CC address contains an apostrophe
2.6 points for this is just un
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Mar 5, 2018, at 11:13 PM, John Hardin wrote:
*before* the @ sign.
It may be perfectly valid to do that, but if it happens more often in spam than
in legitimate mail it is useful to us.
I’m seeing a lot of spam lately with usernames like “bob.from.s
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote:
On 03/05/2018 06:57 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:59 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote:
To: =?utf-8?Q?DermotO=27reilly?=
* 2.6 APOSTROPHE_TOCC To or CC address contains an a
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:47:35 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote:
> > In this case these were really bad spam so the APOSTROPHE_TOCC is
> > just riding on the back of other rules, BLs, and high Bayes
> > scores.
>
> What I generally look at is the detailed rul
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, RW wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:47:35 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote:
In this case these were really bad spam so the APOSTROPHE_TOCC is
just riding on the back of other rules, BLs, and high Bayes
scores.
What I generally look at is
On 03/06/2018 12:54 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, RW wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:47:35 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote:
In this case these were really bad spam so the APOSTROPHE_TOCC is
just riding on the back of other rules, BLs, and high
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote:
On 03/06/2018 12:54 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, RW wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:47:35 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote:
In this case these were really bad spam so the APOSTROPHE_TOCC is
just riding
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 19:27:02 -0700
Amir Caspi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just FYI, for those of you who use DecodeShortURLs.pm ... it
> appears that, if you are running in a per-user setup (i.e., running
> spamd as root such that it does a setuid when invoked from
> spamc, and/or allowing individ
On Mar 6, 2018, at 5:19 PM, RW wrote:
>
> Or probably more commonly when running the spamassassin perl script as
> an ordinary user for test purposes.
Right, if the DB is owned by that user, then they would see the rule fire with
spamassassin and might assume it's all good for everyone. If th
