> A large class of wanted email comes with the "undisclosed recipients" header.
> A large class of wanted email comes from domains that lack SPF.
Our security policy demands rejection of both types. They do not hit SA. They
are denied as soon as their strings are received. The IP of repeated off
Stop that. I did not attack anyone.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Kevin A. McGrail <'kmcgr...@pccc.com'> wrote:
On 2/8/2017 9:04 AM, Ruga wrote:
> Read the headers of RFCs; some o them are explicitly labeled as
> standard. Most of them are request for comments.
I'm well aware of the standards a
> You really don't know how to read, do you?
Now this is a personal attack from you.
Let see who can read amon us.
What is your highest level of formal education?
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Dianne Skoll <'d...@roaringpenguin.com'> wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2017 09:01:35 -0500
Ruga wrote:
>
Proper snail mail and e-mail have addresses. Those who do not, are quickly
archived in the trashcan. This is what we do, and it works.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:13 PM, David Jones <'djo...@ena.com'> wrote:
>From: Ruga
>Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 8:01 AM
>How odd, in a mailing list of sp
On February 9, 2017 3:41:32 AM EST, Ruga wrote:
>Let see who can read amon us.
You spelled "among" incorrectly.
>What is your highest level of formal education?
Um? None of your business?
Master's degree, if you must know.
-- Dianne
On Thu, 09 Feb 2017 03:44:24 -0500
Ruga wrote:
> Proper snail mail and e-mail have addresses. Those who do not, are
> quickly archived in the trashcan. This is what we do, and it works.
We get it.
I'm overcome with delight that you are implementing the mail policy
that you like. It warms my he
Speaking of personal attacks against me, how old are you?
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Reindl Harald <'h.rei...@thelounge.net'> wrote:
Am 09.02.2017 um 09:28 schrieb Ruga:
>> A large class of wanted email comes with the "undisclosed recipients"
>> header. A large class of wanted email come
Remind me to tell you when I use the iPhone.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Dianne Skoll <'d...@roaringpenguin.com'> wrote:
On February 9, 2017 3:41:32 AM EST, Ruga wrote:
>Let see who can read amon us.
You spelled "among" incorrectly.
>What is your highest level of formal education?
Um? N
On Thu, 09 Feb 2017 08:21:28 -0500
Ruga wrote:
[nonsense]
I thought I'd take this opportunity to remind everyone of my Perl package
http://search.cpan.org/~dskoll/Mail-ThreadKiller-1.0.1/lib/Mail/ThreadKiller.pm
Regards,
Dianne.
RFC-822 is the e-mail standard, without "group addresses". What we do complies
with the standard.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Dianne Skoll <'d...@roaringpenguin.com'> wrote:
On Thu, 09 Feb 2017 03:44:24 -0500
Ruga wrote:
> Proper snail mail and e-mail have addr
Ruga wrote:
> RFC-822 is the e-mail standard, without "group addresses". What we do
> complies with the standard.
You are wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.
Take a look at RFC-822: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0822.txt
Go to Section 6. ADDRESS SPECIFICATION. Look at Section 6.1.
Here's a cop
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/duty_calls.png
Come on chaps and chapesses. Nothing is going to be concluded between
you too. And having the last word doesnt make one better than the
others (and it still doesnt make you right).
Just agree that neither of you is going to convince the other or l
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Groach wrote:
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/duty_calls.png
Come on chaps and chapesses. Nothing is going to be concluded between you
too. And having the last word doesnt make one better than the others (and it
still doesnt make you right).
Just agree that neither of you
Although both of this emails were blocked, both emails were really spammy;
one received high score while the other was percentage point away from
passing through. My question pertains to spamassassin not consistently given
"razor score, URIBL, T_REMOTE_IMAGE" to all emails. It is not being more
agg
On 09.02.17 09:34, Motty Cruz wrote:
Although both of this emails were blocked, both emails were really spammy;
one received high score while the other was percentage point away from
passing through. My question pertains to spamassassin not consistently given
"razor score, URIBL, T_REMOTE_IMAGE"
15 matches
Mail list logo
