On 3.9.2015 16.59, Roman Gelfand wrote:
I guessing there must be a a byes/spamassassin portal out there. The
idea is for each user to identify spam messages. If so, which would you
recommend?
Thanks in advance
How would that benefit anyone? How would it work?
Spam is a personal experience.
On 3.9.2015 16.59, Roman Gelfand wrote:
I guessing there must be a a byes/spamassassin portal out there. The
idea is for each user to identify spam messages. If so, which would you
recommend?
Thanks in advance
On 04.09.15 10:42, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
How would that benefit anyone? How wou
On 09/04/2015 10:58 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 3.9.2015 16.59, Roman Gelfand wrote:
I guessing there must be a a byes/spamassassin portal out there. The
idea is for each user to identify spam messages. If so, which would you
recommend?
Thanks in advance
On 04.09.15 10:42, Jari Fre
If an email got rejected, train it or white list it as it never reaches the
client.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:01 AM Axb wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 10:58 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> On 3.9.2015 16.59, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> >>> I guessing there must be a a byes/spamassassin portal out there
On 09/04/2015 05:02 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
If an email got rejected, train it or white list it as it never reaches the
client.
if it gets rejected, you don't have it, right?
if you don't have you can use it to train
if it gets tagged you have to devise a way to retrain/whitelist
there is no
Roman Gelfand skrev den 2015-09-04 17:02:
If an email got rejected, train it or white list it as it never
reaches the client.
fail, spamassassin does not REJECT mails, and if it got rejected there
is no mail to train ham from
wake up :=)
Am 04.09.2015 um 19:24 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Roman Gelfand skrev den 2015-09-04 17:02:
If an email got rejected, train it or white list it as it never
reaches the client.
fail, spamassassin does not REJECT mails, and if it got rejected there
is no mail to train ham from
not, true
* spama
Reindl Harald skrev den 2015-09-04 19:32:
not, true
did you revoke the tarball to include spamass-milter ?
plonk
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Roman Gelfand skrev den 2015-09-04 17:02:
If an email got rejected, train it or white list it as it never
reaches the client.
fail, spamassassin does not REJECT mails, and if it got rejected there is no
mail to train ham from
wake up :=)
Except f
Roman Gelfand skrev den 2015-09-04 17:02:
If an email got rejected, train it or white list it as it never
reaches the client.
Am 04.09.2015 um 19:24 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
fail, spamassassin does not REJECT mails, and if it got rejected there
is no mail to train ham from
On 04.09.15 19:32,
Am 04.09.2015 um 19:46 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
Roman Gelfand skrev den 2015-09-04 17:02:
If an email got rejected, train it or white list it as it never
reaches the client.
Am 04.09.2015 um 19:24 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
fail, spamassassin does not REJECT mails, and if it got reject
Reindl Harald skrev den 2015-09-04 19:51:
tell me something new, in a typical setup SA don't live on a empty
island and on a typical setup you don't deliver every spam and virus
mail just flagged but delivered
here i use as follows:
clamav-milter with reject virus
spampd that only tags spam
Yes, you are absolutely right. I, now, agree there's no need for a portal
in any case.
Thanks everyone for your input.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015, 2:08 PM Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Reindl Harald skrev den 2015-09-04 19:51:
>
> > tell me something new, in a typical setup SA don't live on a empty
> > isl
On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:41:10 -0400
Dave Pooser wrote:
> >looks not so, just 16 hits the last two days and given that we host a
> >lot of domains including subdomains all over the world i guess that
> >would be more visible
>
> And once the www.alfordmedia.com A record was removed from the SBL the
14 matches
Mail list logo
