Re: some questions on sa-compile

2014-05-03 Thread RW
On Fri, 02 May 2014 21:51:02 +0200 Axb wrote: > > 2) The non-amenable rules are processed, but may be slower than if > > they weren't compiled? > > yep It means they get processed as normal in perl, so they don't get speeded-up, but they aren't slowed-down.

Re: some questions on sa-compile

2014-05-03 Thread Axb
On 05/03/2014 01:18 PM, RW wrote: On Fri, 02 May 2014 21:51:02 +0200 Axb wrote: 2) The non-amenable rules are processed, but may be slower than if they weren't compiled? yep It means they get processed as normal in perl, so they don't get speeded-up, but they aren't slowed-down. correct

Re: some questions on sa-compile

2014-05-03 Thread Dave Funk
On Sat, 3 May 2014, RW wrote: On Fri, 02 May 2014 21:51:02 +0200 Axb wrote: 2) The non-amenable rules are processed, but may be slower than if they weren't compiled? yep It means they get processed as normal in perl, so they don't get speeded-up, but they aren't slowed-down. One thing,

Re: Plans for a DMARC plugin ???

2014-05-03 Thread Franck Martin
On Apr 30, 2014, at 5:05 AM, Christian Laußat wrote: > Am 30.04.2014 12:34, schrieb Michael Storz: >> Am 2014-04-30 11:00, schrieb Axb: >>> On 04/30/2014 10:30 AM, Michael Storz wrote: >>> and in the meantime may want to look at >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/opendmarc/ >> OpenDMARC is ok