Re: sa-compile fails after upgrading to Ubuntu 12.10

2012-10-21 Thread Jari Fredriksson
21.10.2012 03:10, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti: > On 10/20/2012 5:01 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: >> Sa-compile says: >> >> # /usr/bin/sa-compile >> Oct 20 23:59:32.992 [6734] info: generic: base extraction starting. this >> can take a while... >> Oct 20 23:59:32.992 [6734] info: generic: extracting f

autolearn

2012-10-21 Thread Joseph Acquisto
Today I found a missed SPAM that contained this in the header: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,MISSING_SUBJECT, T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 The subject was empty with a link starting with "ftp:" I guess it's the autolearn that is mo

Re: autolearn

2012-10-21 Thread Mikael Syska
Hi, On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Joseph Acquisto wrote: > Today I found a missed SPAM that contained this in the header: > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,MISSING_SUBJECT, > T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 > > The subject was empty

Re: autolearn

2012-10-21 Thread Joseph Acquisto
>>> On 10/21/2012 at 11:02 AM, Mikael Syska wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Joseph Acquisto wrote: >> Today I found a missed SPAM that contained this in the header: >> >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 >> tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,MISSING_SUBJECT, >> T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARS

Re: autolearn

2012-10-21 Thread darxus
I believe that means the score was low enough that it was automatically fed to sa-learn as ham (non-spam). That's scary, I don't use it (bayes_auto_learn 0). On 10/21, Joseph Acquisto wrote: > Today I found a missed SPAM that contained this in the header: > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 requi

Re: autolearn

2012-10-21 Thread John Hardin
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: I believe that means the score was low enough that it was automatically fed to sa-learn as ham (non-spam). Correct. That's scary, I don't use it (bayes_auto_learn 0). Agreed, but I run a very small installation. I can see where it would be

Re: autolearn

2012-10-21 Thread Joseph Acquisto
. . . > Joe, what exactly do you mean below when you describe the message? The > subject was only a FTP link (which the hits suggest is not the case)? Or > the subject was empty and the body was only a FTP link? > > Perhaps SA should only autolearn when the body of the message is some > minimum

No magic, since clearing database

2012-10-21 Thread Joseph Acquisto
I cleared the sa database by saying: sa-learn --clear Since then, I have been see this: my_host:~ # sa-learn --dump magic 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0 0 0

Re: No magic, since clearing database

2012-10-21 Thread John Hardin
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Joseph Acquisto wrote: I cleared the sa database by saying: sa-learn --clear Since then, I have been see this: my_host:~ # sa-learn --dump magic 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data:

Re: No magic, since clearing database

2012-10-21 Thread Joseph Acquisto
>>> On 10/21/2012 at 6:39 PM, John Hardin wrote: > On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Joseph Acquisto wrote: > >> I cleared the sa database by saying: sa-learn --clear >> >> Since then, I have been see this: >> >> my_host:~ # sa-learn --dump magic >> 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: baye

Re: No magic, since clearing database

2012-10-21 Thread John Hardin
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Joseph Acquisto wrote: On 10/21/2012 at 6:39 PM, John Hardin wrote: This typically indicates that you aren't running sa-learn while logged in as the user that SA is running as. Does sa-learn actually say it is learning tokens from the messages? Hmm. If I su to spamfil