Hello John,
Saturday, September 15, 2012, 11:28:03 PM, you wrote:
JH> If you subscribe to mail filtering services from a company like
JH> Messagelabs
But Messagelabs also offer spam sending services to their paying
customers.
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fu
On 9/16/2012 1:24 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Saturday, September 15, 2012, 11:28:03 PM, you wrote:
JH> If you subscribe to mail filtering services from a company like
JH> Messagelabs
But Messagelabs also offer spam sending services to their paying
customers.
Right, but is there any evidence t
Hello Dave,
Sunday, September 16, 2012, 8:31:56 AM, you wrote:
DW> better filtering by listing them as trusted_networks
Better filtering by not scoring them as a known spam source!
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpxUeuRoUUZ0.pgp
Description: P
On 9/16/2012 1:37 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Dave,
Sunday, September 16, 2012, 8:31:56 AM, you wrote:
DW> better filtering by listing them as trusted_networks
Better filtering by not scoring them as a known spam source!
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but trusted_networks will score them
Hello Dave,
Sunday, September 16, 2012, 8:50:39 AM, you wrote:
DW> I'm having trouble seeing the downside here, but I might be missing
DW> something obvious...?
DNS blacklist checks will never query for hosts on these networks.
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Co
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 01:50 -0600, Dave Warren wrote:
> On 9/16/2012 1:37 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
> > Hello Dave,
> >
> > Sunday, September 16, 2012, 8:31:56 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > DW> better filtering by listing them as trusted_networks
> >
> > Better filtering by not scoring them as a known spa
On 09/16/2012 01:24 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 01:50 -0600, Dave Warren wrote:
On 9/16/2012 1:37 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Dave,
Sunday, September 16, 2012, 8:31:56 AM, you wrote:
DW> better filtering by listing them as trusted_networks
Better filtering by not scoring
Hello Axb,
Sunday, September 16, 2012, 1:18:59 PM, you wrote:
A> They are 100% whitehat
Why do we see repeat spams from the same customers of theirs? Further
they never even acknowledge reports of spams from their servers.
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullb
On 09/16/2012 02:30 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Sunday, September 16, 2012, 1:18:59 PM, you wrote:
A> They are 100% whitehat
Why do we see repeat spams from the same customers of theirs? Further
they never even acknowledge reports of spams from their servers.
no idea - but if it's
Back at Xmas, I went from Fedora 10 to Fedora 15. Since then I never noticed
that my MySQL AWL table has no entries. Here's what I have:
* spamassassin-3.3.2-7.fc15.x86_64
* In mysql
CREATE TABLE `awl` (
`username` varchar(100) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`email` varchar(200) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
10 matches
Mail list logo