> One crucial thing you didn't post: you ran the learning as root. Is the
> user that spamd is running as also root? The bayes database is
> user-specific, and a common problem is to train the database as a
> different user than the MTA+spamd is running under.
Owner and Group of the folder .spamas
Hey everyone, I'm new to the list and so glad it exists.
We're running into an issue with CKEditor,
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10890407/ckeditors-html-artifacts-trigger-spamassassin-can-you-turn-ckeditors-html-modand
the following rules,
body __SEEK_A5MEIH / cellspacing=\"0\"><\/
On 6/5/2012 11:31 AM, Brett Schenker wrote:
Hey everyone, I'm new to the list and so glad it exists.
We're running into an issue with CKEditor,
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10890407/ckeditors-html-artifacts-trigger-spamassassin-can-you-turn-ckeditors-html-mod
and the following rules,
b
Den 2012-06-05 17:31, Brett Schenker skrev:
Has anyone else tackled the problem and have a solution? Thanks for
any help!
souch rules needs more ham from that editor to compensate for keep away
from hitting this as a spam sign
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:39:29AM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> A) These are just sub rules for use in a meta. As a specialist in
> meta rules, just because you hit a sub rule doesn't matter. What
> matters is if it triggers a scoring rule. Does it?
>
> B) I don't recognize those rules or k
On 06/05/2012 06:26 PM, Christopher Tiwald wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:39:29AM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
A) These are just sub rules for use in a meta. As a specialist in
meta rules, just because you hit a sub rule doesn't matter. What
matters is if it triggers a scoring rule. Does
On 6/5/2012 12:33 PM, Axb wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 06:26 PM, Christopher Tiwald wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:39:29AM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>>> A) These are just sub rules for use in a meta. As a specialist in
>>> meta rules, just because you hit a sub rule doesn't matter. What
>>>
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:46:27PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Those rules don't exist in the current sought rule set. You *are*
> keeping the sought rules updated, right?
>
> What is the date of your 20_sought.cf file?
My file dated from a copy made Monday morning off our spam check server.
I
