Am 28.02.2012 08:45, schrieb Sandro Tosi:
> I know I'm pestering this mailing list, but it would be really awesome
> if someone could let us look at (even partial) patch to implement what
> we need.
>
> Probably the best solution (for now) is to pass the mailbox name to
> spamc and patch spamd to
Il 27/02/2012 15:12, Sandro Tosi ha scritto:
Hello,
our mail setup is kinda different than usual configuration: we have a
lot of mailboxes all owned by a single userid. The directories tree is
composed using a prefix, an elaboration of the domain name (domain.ext
-> ext/d/o/m/domain), and then th
Am 28.02.2012 09:22, schrieb Alessio Cecchi:
> Il 27/02/2012 15:12, Sandro Tosi ha scritto:
>> Hello,
>> our mail setup is kinda different than usual configuration: we have a
>> lot of mailboxes all owned by a single userid. The directories tree is
>> composed using a prefix, an elaboration of the
On 27.02.12 15:12, Sandro Tosi wrote:
our mail setup is kinda different than usual configuration: we have a
lot of mailboxes all owned by a single userid. The directories tree is
composed using a prefix, an elaboration of the domain name (domain.ext
-> ext/d/o/m/domain), and then the local part.
On 27.02.12 11:06, Bowie Bailey wrote:
You can have per-user preferences and you can have scanning at the SMTP
session. Doing both at once can be tricky. For example, if you have an
email being sent to user1 and user2, whose preferences do you use?
spamass-milter has special user in such case
On 27.02.12 11:06, Bowie Bailey wrote:
You can have per-user preferences and you can have scanning at the SMTP
session. Doing both at once can be tricky. For example, if you have an
email being sent to user1 and user2, whose preferences do you use?
On 28.02.12 11:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wr
