Re: SARE and RulesDuJour still relevant

2011-01-15 Thread Ned Slider
On 15/01/11 00:19, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: On 01/14/2011 01:09 PM, Ned Slider wrote: On 14/01/11 21:04, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: Anyone else have effective local rules? Please let me know and I'll put them into the nightly masscheck for testing. Warren header NSL_RCVD_HELO_USER Received

Re: SARE and RulesDuJour still relevant

2011-01-15 Thread Ned Slider
On 15/01/11 01:54, John Hardin wrote: On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Ned Slider wrote: header NSL_RCVD_HELO_USER Received =~ /helo[= ]user\)/i describe NSL_RCVD_HELO_USER Received from HELO User Might want to combine into a meta rule with existing NSL_RCVD_FROM_USER rule: header NSL_RCVD_FROM_USER Rece

Re: SARE and RulesDuJour still relevant

2011-01-15 Thread Warren Togami Jr.
On 01/15/2011 01:36 AM, Ned Slider wrote: In a year of running them locally I've never seen them hit on a ham message. They appear to hit quite well for me because I pre-filter 95%+ of my spam at the smtp level (greylisting, HELO checks, spamhaus etc) so SA only gets to see the difficult to catc

spamc/spamd using IPv6?

2011-01-15 Thread Jari Fredriksson
I just assigned records to my DNS, and spamc/spamd fails. I have a DNS alias spamd for a server. jarif@lancaster:~$ host spamd spamd.fredriksson.dy.fi is an alias for lancaster.fredriksson.dy.fi. lancaster.fredriksson.dy.fi has address 10.123.29.113 lancaster.fredriksson.dy.fi has IPv6 addr