Re: Set for Whitelist Only?

Thanks to everyone who helped with this. A variant of Benny's suggestion works, and can be implemented through plesk without editing the config files directly: 1. Whitelist all acceptable sources. 2. Blacklist *...@*.* 3. Set the reject score to a moderate value, e.g. 10 My whitelisted sources w

Re: More large spam....

On Sun, 2010-06-13 at 11:35 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > There are just a very few rules "scanning" non-textual parts of a mail. > > Large-ish binary attachments don't have much of an impact on > > performance. Large-ish textual attachments po

regex for short messages

Hi, I want to check some mails for their char count (will be part of a meta rule) but spamassassin does hit the rule, even if the mail has less chars than defined in regex. The regex was tested in Perl and was working fine, so what did I miss? bodyMY_BODY_SHORT_MAIL

Re: Detecting mailing list servers / email

Nataraj wrote: I would also think there would be some good header tests, such as having a list-id header, but the problem here is that if this became used universally, spammers could easily add false headers. I've already seen List-id and related headers in spam. :/ -kgd

Re: regex for short messages

Daniel Lemke wrote: > Hi, > > I want to check some mails for their char count (will be part of a meta > rule) but spamassassin does hit the rule, even if the mail has less chars > than defined in regex. > > The regex was tested in Perl and was working fine, so what did I miss? > > body

Re: regex for short messages

On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 07:41 -0700, Daniel Lemke wrote: > I want to check some mails for their char count (will be part of a meta > rule) but spamassassin does hit the rule, even if the mail has less chars > than defined in regex. You mean *more* chars, no? Less than zero isn't possible, and the RE

Re: regex for short messages

Bowie Bailey wrote: > Daniel Lemke wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I want to check some mails for their char count (will be part of a meta >> rule) but spamassassin does hit the rule, even if the mail has less chars >> than defined in regex. >> >> The regex was tested in Perl and was working fine, so what

Problem with sa-update

Hi to all, i have a problem with the command sa-update. When i try to do the command: "sa-update -D --nopgp" The script return this error/warning: "Argument '1.26_01' isen't numeric in subroutine entry at in sa-update line 80" after this the sa-update return "Exit Code 0" (so it seem that the u

Re: regex for short messages

On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Daniel Lemke wrote: I want to check some mails for their char count (will be part of a meta rule) but spamassassin does hit the rule, even if the mail has less chars than defined in regex. bodyMY_BODY_SHORT_MAIL /\A.{0,150}\z/s describe

Incorrect X-Spam-Status header

SA is correctly assigning a high score to an email (Content analysis details: (12.0 points, 3.5 required)) but the X-Spam-Status header reads: No, score=0.0 required=3.5 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_BASE64_TEXT, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,NO_RELAYS,T_HTML_ATTACH autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1... any hints?

Re: Incorrect X-Spam-Status header

On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, dannoz wrote: > > SA is correctly assigning a high score to an email (Content analysis details: > (12.0 points, 3.5 required)) but the X-Spam-Status header reads: No, > score=0.0 required=3.5 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_BASE64_TEXT, > MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,NO_RELAYS,T_HTML_ATTACH auto

Re: regex for short messages

> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:bowie_bai...@buc.com] > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 5:18 PM > > I see now. It's hitting on long messages too. I saw it match the subject > line > rather than the body. I'm not quite sure why. It works if you change it to a > rawbody match. > Thanks a lot that solv