Any idea what is wrong here? I am trying to set up razor on my system.
It is a shared system where I do not have root access.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]# razor-admin -d -create
Razor-Log: Computed razorhome from env: /home/peloruso/.razor
Razor-Log: Found razorhome: /home/peloruso/.razor
Razor-Log:
I think razor is not free anymore.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Having an email problem is painful, but character-building."
On Sep 6, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Skip wrote:
Sep 06 09:25:48.685019 admin[5746]: [ 5] Razor Discovery Server
discovery.razor.cloudmark.com is unreachable
Sep 06 09:25:48.6
Ron Smith wrote:
I think razor is not free anymore.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Having an email problem is painful, but character-building."
Unless there is something newer than this, I believe Razor is free.
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=576145
--
Get my PGP Public ke
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:32:54AM -0400, Skip wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]# telnet discovery.razor.cloudmark.com 2703
> Trying 208.83.137.205...
> telnet: connect to address 208.83.137.205: Connection timed out
> Trying 208.83.137.117...
> telnet: connect to address 208.83.137.117: Connection ti
> "K" == Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
K> Pardon me for putting words in someone's mouth, but I got the
K> impression that the original poster's point was not to advocate
K> disabling signature checking, but to suggest that the error message
K> should be more useful.
Yes, I'm saying ins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I'm saying instead of just letting sa-update fail with the generic
> GNU message and GNU hyperlink, setting the user off on a PhD Thesis
> effort
Wow. Hyperbole much?
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 06/09/2008 4:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, I'm saying instead of just letting sa-update fail with the generic GNU
> message and GNU hyperlink, setting the user off on a PhD Thesis effort
> of trying to figure out what to do, instead just detect the problem and print
> out:
> --
I set score USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST 0
as I guess I'm not the well rounded person reflected in the
pre-defined whitelists. Indeed not many people are I bet.
You see one day this spam got through riding high on that -15 point
boost, causing me to notice the existence of these lists. I'm not sure
if my
On 06/09/2008 6:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I set score USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST 0
> as I guess I'm not the well rounded person reflected in the
> pre-defined whitelists. Indeed not many people are I bet.
>
> You see one day this spam got through riding high on that -15 point
> boost, causing m
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After seeing similar spam from "accredited" senders, we disabled any
> score from the habeas rules long ago and have yet to notice any
> increase in FP (we have ~5000 fairly sensitive users who definitely
> let us know w
>> Hello, this is the sa-update program talking to you.
>> We've detected a problem.
>> You need to do
>> $ wget http://spamassassin.apache.org/updates/GPG.KEY
>> $ sa-update --import GPG.KEY
>> and then run sa-update again. Thank you.
DCWO> Patches welcome. Please keep in mind, when parsing the
>
> Considering that only spammers (er... 'email marketing companies') pay for
> habeas, we have set a POSITIVE score for habeas accredited spam. We track
> any FP right up front, track any rule in a fp (releases from amavisd-new
> managed quarantine), we use sa-learn.pl on shared imap folders,
DCWO> Perhaps you would like to share an example of such a spam
OK, https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5970 thanks.
13 matches
Mail list logo
