Well mouss,
how could I attach a message like this? Let me say, it contained numerous
descriptions of things done when making love, reproductions organs and ways
to increase size of those, is that precise enough, or can you provide me a
not-spam-filtered email i should send it to? :)
Meanwhile I
Hello.
I have a recurrent problem. Many *true* mail are tagged as SPAM because of a
too high score.
Indeed, a parameter causes problem:
MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT is often high
I see http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT
But these mails are sent with an Outlook 12.0, and aren't spa
On 9/2/2008 12:24 PM, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
Hello.
I have a recurrent problem. Many *true* mail are tagged as SPAM because of a
too high score.
Indeed, a parameter causes problem:
MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT is often high
I see http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT
But these ma
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:51:58 +0200
Yet Another Ninja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you post a sample message on some web server (pastebin.com) so ppl
> can see what's causing this?
> PLEASE do NOT munge servernames & IPs
See the headers:
http://pastebin.ca/1191372
I don't have the full messa
On 9/2/2008 1:00 PM, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:51:58 +0200
Yet Another Ninja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you post a sample message on some web server (pastebin.com) so ppl
can see what's causing this?
PLEASE do NOT munge servernames & IPs
See the headers:
http://past
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> On 9/2/2008 1:00 PM, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:51:58 +0200
>> Yet Another Ninja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Can you post a sample message on some web server (pastebin.com) so
>>> ppl can see what's causing this?
>>> PLEASE do NOT munge serve
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:47:18 -0400
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it's obvious what the problem is. There's clearly two @ signs in
> the message-id, which is illegal, but it's what Microsoft is doing anyway.
>
> There's also a bug already open on this.
>
> https://issues.apache.o
Nicolas Letellier writes:
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:47:18 -0400
> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, it's obvious what the problem is. There's clearly two @ signs in
> > the message-id, which is illegal, but it's what Microsoft is doing anyway.
> >
> > There's also a bug already ope
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:47:18 -0400
> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well, it's obvious what the problem is. There's clearly two @ signs in
>> the message-id, which is illegal, but it's what Microsoft is doing anyway.
>>
>> There's also a bug already open on this.
>>
>> https://issue
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicolas Letellier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 2:59 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: problem with MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT
>
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:47:18 -0400
> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well,
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:12:56 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) wrote:
>
> Nicolas Letellier writes:
> > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:47:18 -0400
> > Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Well, it's obvious what the problem is. There's clearly two @ signs in
> > > the message-id, which is i
I have sa-update running from cron every Sunday and on one of my
machines I get the output:
error: gpg required but not found!
I don't understand why I'm getting this. The script says it ouputs
this when it can't find the gpg executable but it is there:
/usr/local/bin/gpg
Just like on all my o
Really though I don't
think named in a caching configuration is too bad of a pig on ram, and
there are high performance/low ram alternatives that just do caching.
I'm using pdnsd here, wich also has the capability to
periodically check the DNS servers it forwards to and mark them
as up/down de
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 13:00 +0200, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:51:58 +0200 Yet Another Ninja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Can you post a sample message on some web server (pastebin.com) so ppl
> > can see what's causing this?
> > PLEASE do NOT munge servernames & IPs
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 15:23 +0200, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
> No, I think put a "#" in a file is more quickly than give you full
> mails and wait for a patch.
> Could you explain me how disable this check? It's important to disable
> MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT.
Just as has been mentioned by others alread
Hi,
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:47:18 -0400
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, it's obvious what the problem is. There's clearly two @ signs in
the message-id, which is illegal, but it's what Microsoft is doing anyway.
There's also a bug already open on this.
ht
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 09:30 -0400, Juan Miscaro wrote:
> I have sa-update running from cron every Sunday and on one of my
> machines I get the output:
>
> error: gpg required but not found!
>
> I don't understand why I'm getting this. The script says it ouput
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:40:18 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 13:00 +0200, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:51:58 +0200 Yet Another Ninja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Can you post a sample message on some web server (past
Hi,
I'd like to log IPs from "Received" headers to spamd's log file for
statistics and further analysis (but only from messages marked as spam).
I tried to modify the code of spamd program, but unsuccessfully, since I
chose to add it to parse_headers() subroutine, where only protocol
specific
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:45:35 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 15:23 +0200, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
>
> > No, I think put a "#" in a file is more quickly than give you full
> > mails and wait for a patch.
> > Could you explain me how disable this check?
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 15:53 +0200, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:40:18 +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Things to consider: (a) Train your ham, in particular FPs like this and
> > any other important mail. (b) Drop that user from your AWL database,
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 16:02 +0200, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:45:35 +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Anyway, I believe just disabling this rule won't help much. See my other
> > post with details about this.
>
> Thanks for the line (and others who
error: gpg required but not found!
/usr/local/bin/gpg
As someone else noted, cron typically has a restricted path.
I have
PATH=/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/pkg/bin/
at the beginning of crontab so that sa-update will find /usr/pkg/bin/gpg
I think it would be better if sa-update found g
2008/9/2 Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 09:30 -0400, Juan Miscaro wrote:
>> I have sa-update running from cron every Sunday and on one of my
>
>> machines I get the output:
>>
>> error: gpg required but not found!
>>
>> I don't u
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
-Original Message-
From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 7:23 PM
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Handy script for generating /etc/resolv.conf
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nix [mailto:[
Thinline Maillist wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to log IPs from "Received" headers to spamd's log file for
statistics and further analysis (but only from messages marked as spam).
I tried to modify the code of spamd program, but unsuccessfully, since I
chose to add it to parse_headers() subroutine, whe
Hi !
I'm using spamassassin 3.1.8 on a server.
This is the last version available from the repository for this particular
linux version.
For some months it seems that both channels I use (saupdates.openprotect.com
and updates.spamassassin.org)
Don't release any update.
I always get a message l
Good morning,
This morning I ran a sa-learn -dump magic and saw the following:
Nspam 201
Nham 242
Soon after I ran spamassassin -D -lint to look for problems and it
reported:
Bayes: not available for scanning, only 189 spam(s) in bayes DB < 200
I re-ran sp-learn -dump magic and saw the
David
3.1.8 is fairly old, doesn't surprise me there's no updates.
--
martin
-Original Message-
From: David Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 6:13 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: sa-update no new rules ?
Hi !
I'm using spamassassin 3.1.8 on a
I'm using version 3.2.5 and the last update I got was on 8/15/08.
"Martin.Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/02/2008 01:57 PM
To
David Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
cc
Subject
RE: sa-update no new rules ?
David
3.1.8 is fairly old, doesn't surprise me there's no updates.
--
martin
--
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 14:31 -0500, Curtis LaMasters wrote:
> I'm having a pretty hard time with this one for some reason, mainly
> because I don't understand regex. I have a large number of emails
> that are getting past my spamassassin setup (Maia Mailguard 1.02a) as
> well as my Barracuda. I wo
> -Original Message-
> From: Derek Harding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 3 September 2008 1:48 p.m.
> To: Curtis LaMasters
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: adding score for email from noreply@
>
> On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 14:31 -0500, Curtis LaMasters wrote:
> > I'm havi
Nicolas Letellier wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:47:18 -0400
> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Well, it's obvious what the problem is. There's clearly two @ signs in
>> the message-id, which is illegal, but it's what Microsoft is doing anyway.
>>
>> There's also a bug already open
David Carvalho wrote:
>
> Hi !
>
> I’m using spamassassin 3.1.8 on a server.
>
> This is the last version available from the repository for this
> particular linux version.
>
> For some months it seems that both channels I use
> (saupdates.openprotect.com and updates.spamassassin.org)
>
> Don’t rel
Raymond Jette wrote:
>
> Good morning,
>
> This morning I ran a sa-learn –dump magic and saw the following:
>
> Nspam 201
>
> Nham 242
>
>
>
> Soon after I ran spamassassin –D –lint to look for problems and it
> reported:
>
> Bayes: not available for scanning, only 189 spam(s) in bayes DB < 200
>
Have you got any answers on this? I have the same problem. Other numbers of
errors. So I am stuck with 3.1.0
--
Regards
Lars Ebeling
http://leopg9.no-ip.org
Hobbithobbyist
"It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and
remove all doubt."
-- Mark Twain
- O
36 matches
Mail list logo
