Re: VBounce FP

Stefan Jakobs writes: > On Friday 16 May 2008 20:45, Christopher Bort wrote: > > The message at [1] hit > > ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE and BOUNCE_MESSAGE despite the host that sent > > it (mailgw02.wolfnettech.com) being listed in my > > whitelist_bounce_relays. What might I

FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK is a nuisance

I received something like this from my email to a list >Sorry for the inconvinience, but we have started to fight against spam. > >Content analysis details: (4.3 points, 4.0 required) > > pts rule name description > -- --

Re: FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK is a nuisance

Jari Fredriksson wrote: I received something like this from my email to a list Sorry for the inconvinience, but we have started to fight against spam. Content analysis details: (4.3 points, 4.0 required) pts rule name description -- ---

Re: FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK is a nuisance

mouss wrote: Jari Fredriksson wrote: I received something like this from my email to a list Sorry for the inconvinience, but we have started to fight against spam. Content analysis details: (4.3 points, 4.0 required) pts rule name description -- -

Re: FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK is a nuisance

> mouss wrote: >> >> Please show full headers of the message. >> >> >> > > actually, you don't need to. your message to the list has > the same "pattern". > > the question is whether something is (re)writing the > message-id or if this a new outlook message-id format? Thanks;) Dunno. I have

Re: FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK is a nuisance

Jari Fredriksson wrote: mouss wrote: Please show full headers of the message. actually, you don't need to. your message to the list has the same "pattern". the question is whether something is (re)writing the message-id or if this a new outlook message-id format? Thanks;)

Re: FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK is a nuisance

> Jari Fredriksson wrote: >>> mouss wrote: >>> Please show full headers of the message. >>> actually, you don't need to. your message to the list >>> has the same "pattern". >>> >>> the question is whether something is (re)writing the >>> message-id or if this a new o

Re: spammytokens

On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 20:25 -0500, Chris wrote: > I'm using the add_header template "add_header all Spammy > _SPAMMYTOKENS(2,long)_". Lately on messages that FetchYahoo picks up from my > Yahoo account the below has started to show up. FetchYahoo adds its own X- > header "X-FetchYahoo: version 2

Re: FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK is a nuisance

I agree - let's get rid of it until it can be fixed. We've had to manually drop the score to zero because of so many complaints. At 08:22 AM 5/17/2008, Jari Fredriksson wrote: I received something like this from my email to a list >Sorry for the inconvinience, but we have started to fight

Re: FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK is a nuisance

mouss - Last week I sent you and the list full headers from the false positives I got on this item. Let's not go around and around. This has been reported numerous times. At 08:51 AM 5/17/2008, mouss wrote: Jari Fredriksson wrote: I received something like this from my email to a list

Re: FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK is a nuisance

On Sat, May 17, 2008 15:28, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > What does it look like, there, my message-id? X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.329 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.171, BAYES_00=-2.599, MAILLISTS=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SPF_PASS=-0.001] no forged here Benny Pedersen Nee

Re: FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 4.1

On 15.05.08 14:42, Philippe Couas wrote: > I have an Server programm sending mail to an PC. This PC reading mail > then forward it to user group. why doesn't the program send mailjust to the user group?? > Mails are reading correctly, but when it was forwarded, it is SPAMMED > with > > FORGE

Re: spammytokens

On Saturday 17 May 2008 10:03 am, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 20:25 -0500, Chris wrote: > > I'm using the add_header template "add_header all Spammy > > _SPAMMYTOKENS(2,long)_". Lately on messages that FetchYahoo picks up from > > my Yahoo account the below has started to sho

Re: DCC Warning

On 15.05.08 14:17, KelvinTang wrote: > All is good, except DCC. > > When I call dcc alone, the result is good: > > > $ dccproc -C -i sample-spam.txt > X-DCC-Rhyolite-Metrics: ns2 104; Body=many Fuz1=many Fuz2=many > repo

Re: How do I Test SpamAssassin

On 16.05.08 21:22, Marc Ferguson wrote: > I am a total newb to spamassassin and some network tools you mentioned > so I don't know how to do what you suggested. I looked up spamc and I > see it's the client to spamd, but I didn't understand fully what I read. > > Besides testing to see if spamass

Duplicate file names problem

>17-May 14:41 wellington-dir JobId 8093: Warning: sql_create.c:1089 More than >one Filename! 2 for file: ex What is this? Is this because I disabled the HAVE_BATCH_FILE_INSERT and the alternative code is (afraid not!) broken? Regards jarif

Re: German Spam

On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 16:06 +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote: > I wish more people would use the ZMI_GERMAN ruleset, and contribute to I used to use it, but dropped it quite a while ago when it didn't hit on *my* particular German spam any longer. During a few weak moments, I even pondered setting

how do you change the way spamassassin parses the recieved header.

The source of my spamd problem is the way spamassassin parses the header. Example I can't use whitelist_from_rcvd because java messaging server forms it's header like this. Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from azkaban.changingstreets.net ([209.255.5.37])  by hermes.changingstreets.com

Re: how do you change the way spamassassin parses the recieved header.

Doh reverse dns wasn't being inserted by the mta just the helo. For anyone that has this problem in the future  make sure you don't have  identnonenumeric inserted into the tcp_local channel then the reverse dns will be inserted into the received header example Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> R

MySQL my.cnf file for innodb

Just looking for some my.cnf example files for SA. Server has 4 gigs of ram, dual core CPU. What do I want in my my.cnf file? Thanks in advance.

Re: VBounce FP

On 05/17/08 01:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) wrote: > Stefan Jakobs writes: > > On Friday 16 May 2008 20:45, Christopher Bort wrote: > > > The message at [1] hit > > > ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE and BOUNCE_MESSAGE despite the host that sent > > > it (mailgw02.wolfnett