Matt Kettler wrote:
>> For some reason one of my domains has all of a sudden been listed in
>> the above listed db. Which is rather ironic since there are only 3
>> active accounts at this domain. 1 used for a couple of mailing lists,
>> 1 - postmaster (inbound email only) and 1 domain contact add
Quoting Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Matt Kettler wrote:
For some reason one of my domains has all of a sudden been listed in
the above listed db. Which is rather ironic since there are only 3
active accounts at this domain. 1 used for a couple of mailing lists,
1 - postmaster (inbound emai
Also, the sa-blacklist inclusion policy is at:
http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/README.policy
Jeff C.
Jeff Chan wrote:
> Quoting Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I don't use it, but it could very easily be turned into an rbldnsd
>> format list - I'm surprised nobody's done that yet. (assuming
>> there's some actual use for the list).
>
> sa-blacklist is the basis of ws.surbl.org:
>
>http:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Dale's Stuff wrote:
Hello,
Trying to figure out what the criteria is for getting a domain listed
in sa-blacklist.current, and more importantly how to be de-listed.
List: AFAIK, you only need to be the From: address on spam sent to one
of Will Stern's spamtrap.
isn't this
Jeff Chan wrote:
Quoting Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Matt Kettler wrote:
For some reason one of my domains has all of a sudden been listed in
the above listed db. Which is rather ironic since there are only 3
active accounts at this domain. 1 used for a couple of mailing lists,
1 - postma
mouss wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Dale's Stuff wrote:
Hello,
Trying to figure out what the criteria is for getting a domain
listed in sa-blacklist.current, and more importantly how to be
de-listed.
List: AFAIK, you only need to be the From: address on spam sent to
one of Will Stern's spamtra
Hello all,
I run a bog-standard out-of-the-box (Fedora 8) SA (v.3.2.4) installation.
Every night I run:
sa-update --channelfile /etc/mail/spamassassin/sare-sa-update-channels.txt
--gpgkey 856AA88A && /sbin/service spamassassin restart
as a cron job. Never been a problem before. But this morning
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
> AWL should be renamed ABL, if it can produce such scores. Must be
> pain.
It is not well named, but think of it as a score balancer. It attempts
to adjust the score towards the average score seen previously for a
sender. If someone who has sent good mail in the past
Jeff Chan wrote:
Also, the sa-blacklist inclusion policy is at:
http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/README.policy
Yes. It's unfortunate that many that use sa-blacklist fail to read this
policy carefully.
Many folks seem to mis-read:
---
In short, I want this list to
> > 100% of the non-English email we're getting is spam, so I
> > added this to my local.cf file:
> >
> >
> > ok_languages en
> >
> >
> > However, I can't see that it's having any effect at all.
> > I'm still getting tons of Russian and asian spams that
> > don't seem to even be triggering any
We're suddenly getting a ton of spam with koi8-r encoding...I tried to do
a custom rule for it like this:
header SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR Subject =~/koi8-r/i
describe SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR has Russian char encoding
score SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR3.5
The short headers for these spams look like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> We're suddenly getting a ton of spam with koi8-r encoding...I tried to
> do a custom rule for it like this:
>
> header SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR Subject =~/koi8-r/i
> describe SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR has Russian char encoding
> score SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR3.5
>
>
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 10:17 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We're suddenly getting a ton of spam with koi8-r encoding...I tried to do
> a custom rule for it like this:
>
> header SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR Subject =~/koi8-r/i
> describe SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR has Russian char encoding
> score SUBJ
Am 2008-02-13 05:14:38, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 21:34 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> > > > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed
> > > > to
> > > > sa-learn --ham and expect i
Am 2008-02-13 10:04:36, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> you can just provide te directory name. sa-learn will then scan the
> directory w/o args limit
Sory, but I use "--dir" since ages and if I have over 1200-1400 messages
sa-learn exit with an error message that I have exceed the limits...
Th
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its
> performance benefits. There aren't many (any?) drawbacks to using it.
I don't use it here because it takes too long (over 20 minutes) to compile.
(This is with SA v3.2.4, which is a
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Per Jessen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > We're suddenly getting a ton of spam with koi8-r encoding...I tried to
> > do a custom rule for it like this:
> >
> > header SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR Subject =~/koi8-r/i
> > describe SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR has Russian char
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> > From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its
> > performance benefits. There aren't many (any?) drawbacks to using
> > it.
>
> I don't use it here because it takes too long (over 20 minutes) to
>
> I don't use it here because it takes too long (over 20 minutes) to
> compile.
> (This is with SA v3.2.4, which is a big improvement over v3.2.3)
>
> L
Why would how long it takes to compile matter as long as you get some return
on investment?
Is the machine heavily loaded or just a small u
I have Thunderbird set up not to show images by default. But some
spammers have discovered a way to encode their images so that they show
despite my settings. The latest example was exceptionally rude.
Is there some rule that I could add to my local.cf to catch any e-mail
that tries this end
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> > > From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its
> > > performance benefits. There aren't many (any?) drawbacks to using
> > > it.
> >
> > I do
>>> 100% of the non-English email we're getting is spam, so
>>> I added this to my local.cf file:
>>>
>>>
>>> ok_languages en
>>>
>>>
>>> However, I can't see that it's having any effect at all.
>>> I'm still getting tons of Russian and asian spams that
>>> don't seem to even be triggering any
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Paul Douglas Franklin wrote:
I have Thunderbird set up not to show images by default. But some
spammers have discovered a way to encode their images so that they show
despite my settings. The latest example was exceptionally rude.
Is there some rule that I could add to my
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> > From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> > > > From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its
> > > > performance benefits. There aren't many (any?
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:52:01 +0200
"Jari Fredriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> 100% of the non-English email we're getting is spam, so
> >>> I added this to my local.cf file:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ok_languages en
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> However, I can't see that it's having any effect at all.
>
At 09:21 14-02-2008, Paul Douglas Franklin wrote:
I have Thunderbird set up not to show images by default. But some
spammers have
This is to block remote images.
discovered a way to encode their images so that they show despite my
settings. The latest example was exceptionally rude.
Is ther
I had deleted the message yesterday--thoroughly--and didn't think to ask
this until today.
Concerning ImageInfo, which sounds like a likely candidate, it's not
installed on my system. I have Kolab installed; it uses an earlier
version of Spamassassin, I'm not sure exactly which one, somewhere
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Paul Douglas Franklin wrote:
I had deleted the message yesterday--thoroughly--and didn't think to ask this
until today.
Concerning ImageInfo, which sounds like a likely candidate, it's not
installed on my system. I have Kolab installed; it uses an earlier version
of Spama
> -Original Message-
> > > We're suddenly getting a ton of spam with koi8-r encoding...I
tried to
> > > do a custom rule for it like this:
> > >
> > > header SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR Subject =~/koi8-r/i
> > > describe SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR has Russian char encoding
> > > score SUBJ_RUSS_C
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Are we not meant to delimit characters like a minus sign?
Ex:
header SUBJ_RUSS_CHAR Subject:raw =~ /koi8\-r/i
Only where they have special meaning, and a dash is only "special" in a
character set, e.g. [A-Z]. I have found the s
> -Original Message-
> From: John Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 2:19 p.m.
> To: Michael Hutchinson
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Rule for Russian character sets
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
>
> > Are we not me
-Original Message-
From: John Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 3:07 p.m.
To: Michael Hutchinson
Subject: RE: Rule for Russian character sets
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> Now what about matching a question mark and an equals sign?
An eq
> -Original Message-
> From: John Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 3:07 p.m.
> To: Michael Hutchinson
> Subject: RE: Rule for Russian character sets
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
>
> > Now what about matching a question mark and an equ
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:19 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
[...]
> Does anyone have suggestions for matching question marks and equals
> signs in one line? I would like to match everything exactly between the
> double quotes:
Apart from neither equal nor minus being any special in an RE (outside
> -Original Message-
> From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 3:43 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Rule for Russian character sets
>
> On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:19 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> [...]
> > Does anyone
Ok fair enough. I've noticed that having the \ doesn't hurt for a dash.
Now what about matching a question mark and an equals sign?
If you read perlre closely you will find it says that it never hurts to put
a backslash before a special character that you want to match as a
character. So this
I am trying to figure out why almost all spam continues to get through. I
use
Fedora 8,
Evolution 2.12.3, and
spamassassin 3.2.4
I have marked as junk, respectively as non-junk, more than 100 mails of
each kind. Probably more than 200 by now.
I have saved to a file the source of one ty
38 matches
Mail list logo
