Matt Kettler writes:
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:07:43PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
> >
> >>> The big question is, where do the devs think folks should go to get it?
> >>>
> >> from SVN directly, I guess.
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk
On 1/31/2008 11:38 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
Matt Kettler writes:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:07:43PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
The big question is, where do the devs think folks should go to get it?
from SVN directly, I guess.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sp
> quick survey:
>
> Is anyone using mass-check without previously having SVN set up?
> Is this turning out to be a major barrier?
> Should we put mass-check back into the distro?
I *used* to rely on mass-check being in the distro for
dnswl.org-mass-checks, which broke when that part was excluded
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 13:30 +1000, David Hobley wrote:
> I have a very bizarre issue here - we use Zimbra and its' built in
> SpamAssassin to manage our Spam - we get a lot of Japanese emails in,
> so I have configured
>
> ok_languages en jp
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_Spa
Justin Mason wrote:
quick survey:
Is anyone using mass-check without previously having SVN set up?
Is this turning out to be a major barrier?
Should we put mass-check back into the distro?
Good survey, although I highly doubt anyone is using it that wouldn't be
able to get it from SVN with
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:38:03AM +, Justin Mason wrote:
> Is this turning out to be a major barrier?
FWIW, there are at least two easy ways to get a full trunk download w/
mass-check and everything else:
svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/trunk
download a tarball from http://svn.apa
Another option, if you are using postfix, is to setup mydomain.com as a
virtual. Then in /etc/postfix/virtuals, you can
mydomain.com virtual
@mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and so on... You can ommit the wildcard one if you
On 1/31/08 at 10:38 AM + Justin Mason wrote:
>Is anyone using mass-check without previously having SVN set up?
Yes, I am. I don't know what's involved in using SVN but I did look at the
SVN tree via the web and at first and second look, it wasn't obvious how to
use the web to easily download
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:07:03PM -0600, Larry Nedry wrote:
> Is mass-check currently under development?
Yes and no. The masses directory, and therefore mass-check, are open for
development at any time. I don't think there's a lot of working going on at
any given time though.
> Where is the ap
jp wrote:
Another option, if you are using postfix, is to setup mydomain.com as a
virtual. Then in /etc/postfix/virtuals, you can
mydomain.com virtual
@mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and so on... You can ommit the wildcar
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:56:49PM +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 20:12 +, Arthur Dent wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 08:22:55PM +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Sorry Chaps, I had no idea this topic would grow so much.
>
>
> Do file-locking, when delivering
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 15:25 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 17:51 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
Perhaps Verizon is screwing up their DNS?
Ahh, yes they are:
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1227
Hrm.
As a troubleshooting hack for this increa
I need to scan a set of archived mbox files for spam, mark the messages
appropriately, and save them in a second mbox file. Should the following
command do what I want?
spamassassin --mbox scanned.mbox
I'm currently running spamc/spamd and know that works strictly one
message at a time, but don't
Apologies to everyone for wasting OT bandwidth. I have just re-read man
procmailrc and realised that a "copy" recipe is not considered to be a
delivery action and therefore does not need a lock.
Removing the lock from my backup copy solves the problem.
I just want to thank everyone for their pati
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Or better yet, just fix the URIBLDNS plugin code to expect responses
matching ^127\.
Anything else is a dns monetizer.
Do any of the DNSBLs or URIBLs that return bitmapped results bitmap into
the first octet? If not, then this sounds like the best
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 09:36:29PM +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 19:31 +, Arthur Dent wrote:
> > Apologies to everyone for wasting OT bandwidth. I have just re-read man
> > procmailrc and realised that a "copy" recipe is not considered to be a
> > delivery action and
Since I was about to hit the send button on this one, here is a shorter
version of my original thoughts. Partially on-topic (yay!) again. ;)
> Fantastic! This worked perfectly "out of the box"! (just edited mydomain).
Good. :)
> Thank you Guenther!
>
> When I moved it from my test rig to the l
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 19:31 +, Arthur Dent wrote:
> Apologies to everyone for wasting OT bandwidth. I have just re-read man
> procmailrc and realised that a "copy" recipe is not considered to be a
> delivery action and therefore does not need a lock.
Uhm, where did you read that? Clearly, eve
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 09:48:20PM +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Since I was about to hit the send button on this one, here is a shorter
> version of my original thoughts. Partially on-topic (yay!) again. ;)
Oops - I was busy replying to your last message and didn't see this one come
in...
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 09:18:38PM +, Arthur Dent wrote:
I've just been doing a little reading..
> > > # Spam filter
> > >
> > > :0fw
> > > * < 256000
> > > | /usr/bin/spamc --username=mark
> >
> > If there is even the slightest chance, your MTA might flood your MDA
> > with mail during a p
What should dig return? I too have Verizon fios. If /etc/resolve.conf
contains their DNS servers I get similar dig results as you. If I change
it to DNS servers I trust I get:
$ dig techweb.com.multi.surbl.org
; <<>> DiG 9.2.4 <<>> techweb.com.multi.surbl.org
;; global options: printcmd
;; G
At 11:40 31-01-2008, John Hardin wrote:
Do any of the DNSBLs or URIBLs that return bitmapped results bitmap
into the first octet? If not, then this sounds like the best
solution, even though it doesn't give the administrator any feedback
that DNS hijacking is taking place...
This hijacking ma
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, David Zinder wrote:
> What should dig return? I too have Verizon fios. If /etc/resolve.conf
> contains their DNS servers I get similar dig results as you. If I change
> it to DNS servers I trust I get:
>
> $ dig techweb.com.multi.surbl.org
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.2.4 <<>> techweb.co
> > > If there is even the slightest chance, your MTA might flood your MDA
> > > with mail during a peek -- add some explicit locking here, even though
> > > this is not a delivery receipt (explicit, because it is a filter, and
> > > procmail can't lock the target file). IIRC the SA docs do have a
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Arthur Dent wrote:
http://www.issociate.de/board/post/232336/Lock_failure_on_%22spamc.lock%22.html
and
http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/#SA
which tend to suggest that one should NOT put a lock on for SA
processing...
A lock file is not *needed* for spamc (or
David Zinder wrote:
> Is this a correct response from dig? If so, changing the DNS servers in
> /etc/resolve.conf does not fix my problem. The techweb.com email is
> still reported on the blocklists.
Did you restart SA after editing resolv.conf?
> I have also tried dig from two other
> email serv
Martin Gregorie wrote:
I need to scan a set of archived mbox files for spam, mark the messages
appropriately, and save them in a second mbox file. Should the following
command do what I want?
spamassassin --mbox scanned.mbox
No, SA doesn't know how to split up messages for scanning; sa-learn
NOTE I just realized I used "consecutive" a couple times in my previous
posts, whereas I did mean to say "concurrent". Bad, bad screw up.
Sorry for any confusion caused.
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 20:57 +, Arthur Dent wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 09:36:29PM +0100, Karsten Bräckelm
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:35:17PM +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> > > > If there is even the slightest chance, your MTA might flood your MDA
> > > > with mail during a peek -- add some explicit locking here, even though
> > > > this is not a delivery receipt (explicit, because it is a filte
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 22:57 +, Arthur Dent wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:35:17PM +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Thanks for this. I appreciate you taking the time to explain this. I respect
> your opinion so I have the locks in place just as you suggest.
>
> Incidentally, with those
Better yet, avoid being a victim of dns hijacking by accessing SURBL &
URIBL (and other dnsbls!) via RSYNC. If implemented correctly, this will
result in performance gains as well!
--Rob McEwen
> > spamassassin --mbox scanned.mbox
>
> No, SA doesn't know how to split up messages for scanning; sa-learn
> is the only SA component that can extract messages from an mbox mail
> folder.
>
In that case, what does the --mbox option do? Not what I expected,
evidently.
> If I accidentally mangl
David Zinder wrote:
What should dig return? I too have Verizon fios. If /etc/resolve.conf
contains their DNS servers I get similar dig results as you. If I
change it to DNS servers I trust I get:
$ dig techweb.com.multi.surbl.org
; <<>> DiG 9.2.4 <<>> techweb.com.multi.surbl.org
;; global op
Martin Gregorie wrote:
spamassassin --mbox scanned.mbox
No, SA doesn't know how to split up messages for scanning; sa-learn
is the only SA component that can extract messages from an mbox mail
folder.
In that case, what does the --mbox option do? Not what I expected,
evidently.
Matt Kettler wrote:
Martin Gregorie wrote:
spamassassin --mbox scanned.mbox
No, SA doesn't know how to split up messages for scanning; sa-learn
is the only SA component that can extract messages from an mbox mail
folder.
In that case, what does the --mbox option do? Not what I ex
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 05:53:57PM -0500, Kris Deugau wrote:
> No, SA doesn't know how to split up messages for scanning; sa-learn is
> the only SA component that can extract messages from an mbox mail folder.
Huh? SA, and spamassassin specifically, certainly does handle splitting up
mbox files
Martin Gregorie wrote:
spamassassin --mbox scanned.mbox
No, SA doesn't know how to split up messages for scanning; sa-learn
is the only SA component that can extract messages from an mbox mail
folder.
In that case, what does the --mbox option do? Not what I expected,
evidently.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:23:19PM +, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> I need to scan a set of archived mbox files for spam, mark the messages
> appropriately, and save them in a second mbox file. Should the following
> command do what I want?
>
> spamassassin --mbox scanned.mbox
Yes, though you can
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:22:48PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Ok, open mouth, insert foot.. there *IS* a --mbox option to spamassassin
> in the 3.2 branch. I'm not sure if it will output in mbox format.. you
> can give it a shot and see if the new mailbox file works..
Yes, yes it will. The hi
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
--mbox
Specify that the input message(s) are in mbox format.
mbox is a standard Unix message folder format.
[...]
To pick a very small nit - 'mbox' isn't referring to a folder. It's a
file.
'maildir' could be called a folder format.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 06:47:43PM -0600, Bookworm wrote:
> To pick a very small nit - 'mbox' isn't referring to a folder. It's a
> file.
That depends if you're defining folder == directory, or if you're using the
standard MUA definition of folder which is just a place to store messages.
--
Looking at my stats I see those hitting LONGWORDS and scoring BAYES_50
or higher are all big time spam that have been hard to catch, see my
posts earlier this week 'bayes and celeb spam'. Would it be a bad idea
to add to the score when both hit? It looks like a score of 3.5 will be
needed for the e
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 7:51 pm, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> http://esmtp.webtent.net/test2.txt
>
> I have gone through my debug, but can't seem to spot any problems. How
> can one send debug output to file? And what do you think I should be
> looking for given the results of my test?
FWIW, on
43 matches
Mail list logo
