Peter Pluta wrote:
> I have a relatively stock install of amavisd-new and spamassassin. How can I
> enable all the RBL checks. I think this is my main source of spam the lack
> of RBL's. I checked an ip of a spam I recently got and it showed up as
> "SPAM" in the dnstools spam database checker. I
Peter,
> I have a relatively stock install of amavisd-new and spamassassin. How can
> I enable all the RBL checks. I think this is my main source of spam the
> lack of RBL's. I checked an ip of a spam I recently got and it showed up as
> "SPAM" in the dnstools spam database checker. I haven't been
I'm running amavisd-new with spamassassin and setup bayes and mysql earlier
today. It seems to connect to the db fine with user vscan when running
spamassassin -d. I ran sa-learn --spam/ham < spam.txt (full email headers
too) a few times and those are the only entires in the db, the ones that I
ad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary V wrote:
>> I'm running amavisd-new with spamassassin and setup bayes and mysql
>> earlier
>> today. It seems to connect to the db fine with user vscan when running
>> spamassassin -d. I ran sa-learn --spam/ham < spam.txt (full email headers
>> to
Gary V-2 wrote:
>
>>I'm running amavisd-new with spamassassin and setup bayes and mysql
earlier
>>today. It seems to connect to the db fine with user vscan when running
>>spamassassin -d. I ran sa-learn --spam/ham < spam.txt (full email headers
>>too) a few times and those are the only entires i
Gary V-2 wrote:
>
>>I'm running amavisd-new with spamassassin and setup bayes and mysql
earlier
>>today. It seems to connect to the db fine with user vscan when running
>>spamassassin -d. I ran sa-learn --spam/ham < spam.txt (full email
headers
>>too) a few times and those are the only entires in
Gary V-2 wrote:
>
>>Gary V-2 wrote:
>> >
>> >>I'm running amavisd-new with spamassassin and setup bayes and mysql
>>earlier
>> >>today. It seems to connect to the db fine with user vscan when running
>> >>spamassassin -d. I ran sa-learn --spam/ham < spam.txt (full email
>>headers
>> >>too) a f
Steven Stern wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gary V wrote:
>>> I'm running amavisd-new with spamassassin and setup bayes and mysql
>>> earlier
>>> today. It seems to connect to the db fine with user vscan when running
>>> spamassassin -d. I ran sa-learn --spam/ham
Mark Martinec wrote:
>
> Peter,
>
>> I have a relatively stock install of amavisd-new and spamassassin. How
>> can
>> I enable all the RBL checks. I think this is my main source of spam the
>> lack of RBL's. I checked an ip of a spam I recently got and it showed up
>> as
>> "SPAM" in the dnsto
> I would run
> amavisd stop
> amavisd -d bayes debug-sa
>
> then send a message containing the gtube string through it. Send the
> message
> from the outside world (smtp), not from the local machine. See what
> amavisd-new thinks of Bayes.
>
I will try that, what exactly is the "gtube" string?
Hi all
I would like to configure spamassassin to run in this scenario:
host A: mta+spamc+ldirectord
host(s) B: a couple of hosts in wich is installed spamassassin server
processes (spamd).
Host A and host(s) B talk each other via tcp sockets configured in
spamassassin configuration files.
The m
Server .116
The email attached has been identified by one of our team as legitimate but
unfortunately was incorrectly tagged as SPAM.
The email address has been whitelisted to ensure this will not happen again and
we are currently looking into the reasons why this happened.
No mail has been lo
Hi all,
I hope to replace a proprietary antispam-appliace with SA but have one
annoying requirement: the current one keeps spam in a quarantine which
users can access with http. Using that web-frontend they can retrieve
quarantined messages.
Do you know of any software (preferably open-source) wh
On 10-Jun-2007, at 00:19, Peter Pluta wrote:
I haven't been able to find
any good guides on RBL's and spamassassin on Google.
Towards the bottom of smtpd_recipient_restrictions (right before
'permit')
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
That's all you need to know
--
Like the moment when
On 10-Jun-2007, at 15:21, LuKreme wrote:
On 10-Jun-2007, at 00:19, Peter Pluta wrote:
I haven't been able to find
any good guides on RBL's and spamassassin on Google.
Towards the bottom of smtpd_recipient_restrictions (right before
'permit')
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
That's all
Patrick von der Hagen wrote:
> I hope to replace a proprietary antispam-appliace with SA but have one
> annoying requirement: the current one keeps spam in a quarantine which
> users can access with http. Using that web-frontend they can retrieve
> quarantined messages.
>
> Do you know of any sof
LuKreme wrote:
>
> On 10-Jun-2007, at 15:21, LuKreme wrote:
>> On 10-Jun-2007, at 00:19, Peter Pluta wrote:
>>> I haven't been able to find
>>> any good guides on RBL's and spamassassin on Google.
>>
>> Towards the bottom of smtpd_recipient_restrictions (right before
>> 'permit')
>>
>> rejec
John Rudd wrote:
In my opinion, the Botnet plugin should recognize that as botnet, but
I could be wrong.
Botnet is looking for hosts whose DNS looks like a dynamic or dial-up
customer. So, if the host has no reverse DNS, the reverse DNS doesn't
match forward DNS, or the forward DNS contains
Hi All,
Apologies if this has been posted under another thread. If so can
someone point me to it?
As per recent instructions I'm running RDJ manually and getting this:
>Lint output: [27805] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
>"/etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_adult.cf":
>[27805] wa
As per recent instructions I'm running RDJ manually and getting this:
"/etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_adult.cf": Sorry, the site you requested
is
currently unavailable. It will be avaiable as soon as possible.
Please try again later.
Any suggestions bar 'bury head in sand'?
Perhaps try a
Quoting Peter Pluta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I have a relatively stock install of amavisd-new and spamassassin. How can I
> enable all the RBL checks. I think this is my main source of spam the lack
> of RBL's. I checked an ip of a spam I recently got and it showed up as
> "SPAM" in the dnstools s
21 matches
Mail list logo
