NO_DNS_FOR_FROM

2007-02-19 Thread Mike Kenny
Some mail is getting bounced due to receiving a largish number of points for the rule in the Subject line. When I dig the from address the MX does resolve to a valid address, but the A record resolves to 127.0.0.1. Is this what is causing the rule to hit? Is this a mis-configured DNS? Thanks mi

RE: just add header to spam mail

2007-02-19 Thread Jon Armitage
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I was wondering if its possiable to make it just add the > headers to the email and not change the email in any other > way. Look at the options for report_safe in your local.cf. I think this will do what you wan

5 Things the Boss Should Know About Spam Fighting

2007-02-19 Thread Kenneth Porter
Here's a mention of Spamassassin:

Re: Vbounce ruleset whitelist_bounce_relays

2007-02-19 Thread Jeremy Fairbrass
Hi Justin, What exactly is the fix, and where do I find it? I just installed the VBounce plugin on my server this weekend (for the first time), and have the same probs described here - ie. although I've added my server to whitelist_bounce_relays in local.cf, I'm not getting the MY_SERVERS_FOUND

Spamtrap detectors?

2007-02-19 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
I'm getting lots of messages like the following one: Hi How are you ? Call me. who are free to come Poor you, i don't even think how much spam you are recive. front of get-smart 68793379 They are all directed to

Re: Spamtrap detectors?

2007-02-19 Thread mewolf1
On 02/19/07 15:21, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Are they spamtrap-detecting messages (see partially masked code), > bayes poisoners (last text line often changes), a spammer exploding > in a supernova, or every of the above? Thanks for mentioning them, now I have noticed t

RE: Spamtrap detectors?

2007-02-19 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On 02/19/07 15:21, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > Are they spamtrap-detecting messages (see partially masked code), > > bayes poisoners (last text line often changes), a spammer exploding > > in a supernova, or eve

Re: confirm subscribe to users@spamassassin.apache.org

2007-02-19 Thread Matthias Blaser

problems with load-balanced spamd/spamc setup

2007-02-19 Thread Matthias Blaser
(Sorry about the confirmation sent to the list, I wasn't aware that I hit "reply all") Hi, I'm trying to load-balance several spamd hosts using a tcp-proxy (balance and crossover) to have more control about balancing than just with randomized DNS entries... but I ran into (the same) problems w

Problem with archive-iterator: invalid (undef) format

2007-02-19 Thread Steven W. Orr
I'm running 3.1.8-1 on Fedora Core 4. When spam makes it through I pump it out to spamcop using this command: exec tee >(mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]) | sa-learn --spam I get the following output: archive-iterator: invalid (undef) format in target list, 2 at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/Spam

force bayes expiry for all users in a bayes db per user scenario

2007-02-19 Thread mailinglists
Hi I have a problem with timeouts on the bayes expiry on SpamAssassin 3.1.7. These log messages look like this: spamd[5148]: bayes: expire_old_tokens: child processing timeout at spamd line 1083, line 369. spamd[22114]: bayes: child processing timeout at spamd line 1083. Because of these timeou

Re: Problem with archive-iterator: invalid (undef) format

2007-02-19 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:23:32AM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote: > Is this a bug? Can I fix it? Is it an error or a warning? https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5336 -- Randomly Selected Tagline: Eating an anchovy is like eating an eyebrow. pgpf4UToxEBAE.pgp Description: PGP s

unsubscribe

2007-02-19 Thread gregp
unsubscribe

Re: unsubscribe

2007-02-19 Thread Evan Platt
At 10:19 AM 2/19/2007, gregp wrote: unsubscribe As the hedaers say: list-unsubscribe:

Re: dkim plugins warnings

2007-02-19 Thread Mark Martinec
Bill Landry writes, > Mark, your patches for DKIM.pm and DkSignature.pm took care of the issue > I was seeing with GMail DomainKey signatures, since they were missing > the "q=dns" tag. Below is a similar patch to Mail/DKIM/DkSignature.pm, this time to handle missing 'a' tags in DomainKeys signatu

Re: Bayes db size....

2007-02-19 Thread Ken Menzel
- Original Message - From: "Dave Koontz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'spam mailling list'" Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 9:30 AM Subject: Re: Bayes db size Is there a consensus on this need? I deal with the seen db issue by scheduled deletion of that file. That said, with SA b

RE: just add header to spam mail

2007-02-19 Thread Bowie Bailey
Jon Armitage wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I was wondering if its possiable to make it just add the > > headers to the email and not change the email in any other > > way. > > Look at the options for report_safe in your local.cf. I

Re: just add header to spam mail

2007-02-19 Thread matt
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 04:29:19PM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote: > Jon Armitage wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I was wondering if its possiable to make it just add the > > > headers to the email and not change the email in any othe

Using ^ and $ in SA Rules

2007-02-19 Thread Ben Wylie
I have tried to write a rule which would hit a line which only contains four capital letters, each separated by a space. so i wrote a body rule: /^[A-Z]\s[A-Z]\s[A-Z]\s[A-Z]$/ unfortunately it doesn't hit when I expect it to: C T C X If I take the ^ and $ parts, it does hit, but i would like i

Re: Using ^ and $ in SA Rules

2007-02-19 Thread John D. Hardin
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Ben Wylie wrote: > so i wrote a body rule: > /^[A-Z]\s[A-Z]\s[A-Z]\s[A-Z]$/ > > unfortunately it doesn't hit when I expect it to: > C T C X > > If I take the ^ and $ parts, it does hit, but i would like it to > only hit if that is the only thing on a particular line. > > Ha

Re: Spamtrap detectors?

2007-02-19 Thread matt
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:21:10PM +0100, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > I'm getting lots of messages like the following one: > > Hi > How are you ? Call me. > who are free to come > Poor you, i don't even think how much spam you are recive. > front of get-smart >

Undefined subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DBI::dbi

2007-02-19 Thread Chris
This was the output of my sa-update cronjob this morning: Undefined subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DBI::dbi called at /etc/mail/spamassassin/DBI.pm line 162. I take it this has to do with the new option --allowplugins? -- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C pgpl90pFjPitJ.pgp Description:

Re: Undefined subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DBI::dbi

2007-02-19 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 05:50:27PM -0600, Chris wrote: > This was the output of my sa-update cronjob this morning: > > Undefined subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DBI::dbi called > at /etc/mail/spamassassin/DBI.pm line 162. > > I take it this has to do with the new option --allowplugins?

Re: Spamtrap detectors?

2007-02-19 Thread Jason Heiser
I have a wildcard for my domain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and I've received three of these today. Here's an example of one: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from murder ([unix socket]) by kubrick.heiser.org (Cyrus v2.2.12-OS X 10.3) with LMTPA; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:46:29 -

Re: Using ^ and $ in SA Rules

2007-02-19 Thread Ben Wylie
John D. Hardin wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Ben Wylie wrote: so i wrote a body rule: /^[A-Z]\s[A-Z]\s[A-Z]\s[A-Z]$/ unfortunately it doesn't hit when I expect it to: C T C X If I take the ^ and $ parts, it does hit, but i would like it to only hit if that is the only thing on a particular line

RE: Spamtrap detectors?

2007-02-19 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
From: Jason Heiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Spamtrap detectors? > > I have a wildcard for my domain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and I've received > three of these today. Here's an example of one: > > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Received: from murder ([unix socket]) > > b

Re: NO_DNS_FOR_FROM

2007-02-19 Thread Matt Kettler
Mike Kenny wrote: > Some mail is getting bounced due to receiving a largish number of > points for the rule in the Subject line. > When I dig the from address the MX does resolve to a valid address, > but the A record resolves to 127.0.0.1 . Is this > what is causing the rule to

Re: Using ^ and $ in SA Rules

2007-02-19 Thread Matt Kettler
Ben Wylie wrote: > I have tried to write a rule which would hit a line which only > contains four capital letters, each separated by a space. > > so i wrote a body rule: > /^[A-Z]\s[A-Z]\s[A-Z]\s[A-Z]$/ > > unfortunately it doesn't hit when I expect it to: > C T C X > > If I take the ^ and $ parts

Re: Using ^ and $ in SA Rules

2007-02-19 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:26:17AM +, Ben Wylie wrote: > >>so i wrote a body rule: > >>/^[A-Z]\s[A-Z]\s[A-Z]\s[A-Z]$/ > >> > >>Have I made a mistake here? How might I get a rule like this to > >>work? body rules aren't run on lines, they're run on paragraphs, so that text is in the middle of a

Re: Using ^ and $ in SA Rules

2007-02-19 Thread Ben Wylie
Matt Kettler wrote: Ben Wylie wrote: I have tried to write a rule which would hit a line which only contains four capital letters, each separated by a space. so i wrote a body rule: /^[A-Z]\s[A-Z]\s[A-Z]\s[A-Z]$/ unfortunately it doesn't hit when I expect it to: C T C X If I take the ^ and $

Re: Using ^ and $ in SA Rules

2007-02-19 Thread Loren Wilton
Oh, you are going for a body rule, and the source is html. Whether the body (which is broken into sections) starts just before the term you want is questionable. Ah, there is also a plain text section. That makes it a little easier. Try this: body FOO_SYMBOL/\n\s{0,15}[A-Z]\s[A-Z]\s

Re: Using ^ and $ in SA Rules

2007-02-19 Thread Loren Wilton
An example email which doesn't hit can be found here: http://www.arkbb.co.uk/ExampleEmail.txt I just looked again at that spam. I'm somewhat amused by the current and projected prices: Currently priced at: .80 Expected: .00 Loren

Re: Undefined subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DBI::dbi

2007-02-19 Thread Chris
On Monday 19 February 2007 6:06 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 05:50:27PM -0600, Chris wrote: > > This was the output of my sa-update cronjob this morning: > > > > Undefined subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DBI::dbi called > > at /etc/mail/spamassassin/DBI.pm line 162.

turning off autolearn

2007-02-19 Thread Chris
I've been running SA for a few years with this in my local.cf # Enable Bayes auto-learning bayes_auto_learn 0 bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1 bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 10.0 Now I see that autolearn is active again, I've read man:Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AutoLearnThreshold But

Re: turning off autolearn

2007-02-19 Thread Chris
On Monday 19 February 2007 10:14 pm, Chris wrote: > I've been running SA for a few years with this in my local.cf > > # Enable Bayes auto-learning > bayes_auto_learn 0 > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1 > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 10.0 > > Now I see that autolearn is active again, I've

Re: turning off autolearn

2007-02-19 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:32:18PM -0600, Chris wrote: > > bayes_auto_learn 0 > Maybe I should be a bit more clear, I had the above in my local.cf and > whenever a message whether it ham or spam came in it was tagged > autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7, what I'd like to know is how to disable >

unsubscribe

2007-02-19 Thread Rice, Kevin
unsubscribe

Re: unsubscribe

2007-02-19 Thread Evan Platt
At 08:44 PM 2/19/2007, Rice, Kevin wrote: unsubscribe As the headers of every message state: list-unsubscribe:

Re: Undefined subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DBI::dbi

2007-02-19 Thread Michael Parker
Chris wrote: > On Monday 19 February 2007 6:06 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 05:50:27PM -0600, Chris wrote: >>> This was the output of my sa-update cronjob this morning: >>> >>> Undefined subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DBI::dbi called >>> at /etc/mail/spamassassin/D