I'm running SpamAssassin on a CentOS/BlueQuartz system.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to incorporate spamassassin into the
included majordomo 1.94.x system? Idiots spam "majordomo owner" and/or a
few of the majordomo lists. which results in me (as admin) getting bounce
messages when
From: "Andy Dills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Andy Dills wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, decoder wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
> since 3.5.0 RC1 was released, we fixed many bugs, thanks to the many
> testers and bug reporters :) so big t
> What I meant is that Amavisd may look in a non-standard place for
> SpamAssassin's local.cf and other config files. I looked at my Amavis
> config file and did not see a place to change it, but I seem to remember
> somebody saying that it is possible.
The only thing that needs to be remembered
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jdow wrote:
> From: "Andy Dills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Andy Dills wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, decoder wrote:
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
since 3.5.0 RC1 w
On Sunday 07 January 2007 13:00, John Rudd wrote:
> Have you put your own server into your trusted networks?
It's a Plesk install and I generally don't edit their configuration files.
I'll look into it.
> Have you put your own server into any of the various configs in
> Botnet.cf (the skip or p
Installed the Debian package. How do I know it is working? Are all those
"SPAMMY" rules its?
* Chris Lear wrote (01/12/06 16:57):
> * Adam Stephens wrote (01/12/06 16:10):
>> Chris Lear wrote:
>>> * Loren Wilton wrote (01/12/06 14:54):
>>>
> The html contains this sort of thing:
> http://www.easyjet.com/EN/Members/
>
> Which looks like the culprit. In fact, every full st
Installed the Debian package. How do I know it is working? Are all those
"SPAMMY" rules its?
I looks like you are using amavisd-new. SPAMMY essentially means a message
scored between tag2_level and kill_level and is not directly related to
FuzzyOcr. If you get FuzzyOcr hits you will see FUZZY_
From: decoder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ...omissis...
>
> > Hash the hashes and store them in a suitable tree?
> I explained before that you cannot hash the hashes because a
> cryptographic hash is tolerance resistant. A fuzzy matching on such a
> hash of the actual hash is impossible then.
O
On Monday 08 January 2007 18:34, Gary V wrote:
> >Installed the Debian package. How do I know it is working? Are all those
> >"SPAMMY" rules its?
>
> I looks like you are using amavisd-new. SPAMMY essentially means a message
> scored between tag2_level and kill_level and is not directly related to
Will Nordmeyer wrote:
> Does anyone have any suggestions on how to incorporate spamassassin into the
> included majordomo 1.94.x system? Idiots spam "majordomo owner" and/or a
> few of the majordomo lists. which results in me (as admin) getting bounce
> messages when Majordomo responds to such po
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Jorge Valdes wrote:
> I do understand that in large environments, optimizations have to be made in
> order not to kill server performance, and expiration is probably something
> that could be done at "more convenient times". I will commit a script that
> can safely be run as a
From: Andy Dills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ...omissis...
>
> > I understand that the "order" keyword in select is potentially
> expensive, but
> > necessary because matches occur generally towards the most
> recent entries,
> > thus increasing the possibility of a match earlier on. When
>
http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/index.lasso
seems spamassassin missing 7 and 8 on the return codes ?
should i make a bug on this ?
--
This message was sent using 100% recycled spam mails.
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:46:31PM +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/index.lasso
> seems spamassassin missing 7 and 8 on the return codes ?
> should i make a bug on this ?
I just pushed out an update for 3.1 which includes 7 and 8. Not sure why
those weren't in there befo
Giampaolo: I hope you succeed.
I've given up hope on convincing folks (Mapquest in particular) that radius
searches can be indexed. You needn't pull the lat/long of every single entry
to run the distance function, and then discard the ones too far away. You
can index on LAT and LONG and structure
I just pushed out an update for 3.1 which includes 7 and 8. Not sure why
those weren't in there before. :(
I'm getting NO hits for anything but .2, .4, .5, .11
Len
From: Dan Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Giampaolo: I hope you succeed.
>
> I've given up hope on convincing folks (Mapquest in particular)
> that radius
> searches can be indexed. You needn't pull the lat/long of every
> single entry
> to run the distance function, and then discard the o
Andy Dills wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Jorge Valdes wrote:
I do understand that in large environments, optimizations have to be made in
order not to kill server performance, and expiration is probably something
that could be done at "more convenient times". I will commit a script that
can sa
Is the PBL (codes 10 & 11) stable enough to run in production? I notice
these are not in the current SA rulesets
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:49 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: xbl.spamhaus.org
>
> Is the PBL (codes 10 & 11) stable enough to run in
> production? I notice these are not in the current SA rulesets
>
>
>From another list:
>FYI: We will 'officially' release the PBL during the coming week, however
the PBL zone is currently live as >a public beta. MTAs already query
This is not a problem with sa-stats so much as dealing with syslog. My
syslog logs messages with the month day and time but no year. Also, I
create a rollover (using logrotate) for my logfile cleanup of 24 instead
of 4.
To deal with the logfiles being processed in the correct order, I had to
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 04:07:03PM -0500, Dave Koontz wrote:
> Is the PBL (codes 10 & 11) stable enough to run in production? I notice
> these are not in the current SA rulesets
The PBL is in the 3.1 updates fwiw, but it has a small score at the moment.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"The on
I just upgraded to 3.5.1 and it seemed that everything was working
until I tried using sa-learn on a few messages. Running
"spamassassin -D --lint" produces the following errors:
[22986] dbg: plugin: fixed relative path: /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.pm
[22986] dbg: plugin: loading FuzzyOcr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ed Kasky wrote:
> I just upgraded to 3.5.1 and it seemed that everything was working
> until I tried using sa-learn on a few messages. Running
> "spamassassin -D --lint" produces the following errors:
>
> [22986] dbg: plugin: fixed relative path:
> /
=_NextPart_001_0005_45a034b1.09C52269
=_NextPart_001_0002_45a034b2.0E1F3F27
=_NextPart_002_0006_45a0373f.08B98992
=_NextPart_001_0004_45a034b3.0F75E7CC
=_NextPart_003_0010_45a03785.0B45BD91
The 5 NextPart's above represent 5 random samplings of mail that is going
out via Sen
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 06:00:06PM -0500, Office of the Postmaster wrote:
> =_NextPart_001_0005_45a034b1.09C52269
>
> Can someone explain what is wrong with them? Do I need to re configure
> mail clients or servers?
Nothing's wrong with them. A decent amount of spam used to use that, so a
> [22986] dbg: plugin: loading
> FuzzyOcr from /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.pm Subroutine
> FuzzyOcr::O_NONBLOCK redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.1/Exporter.pm
> line 60. at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.1/i686-linux-thread-multi/POSIX.pm
> line 19
For this particular issue I found that Net::Ident is inv
It seems to be my couple of days to try and find out some problems.
A 3-5% ratio of our email is getting tagged with HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32 which
according to the DOC is HTML: images with 2800-3200 bytes of words. The
only problem is the emails in question had only 1 image in them and it was
a sp
At 06:07 PM 1/8/2007, you wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 06:00:06PM -0500, Office of the Postmaster wrote:
> =_NextPart_001_0005_45a034b1.09C52269
>
> Can someone explain what is wrong with them? Do I need to re configure
> mail clients or servers?
Nothing's wrong with them. A decent amoun
Heute (09.01.2007/00:30 Uhr) schrieb Gary V,
>> > [22986] dbg: plugin: loading
>> > FuzzyOcr from /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.pm Subroutine
>> > FuzzyOcr::O_NONBLOCK redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.1/Exporter.pm
>> > line 60. at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.1/i686-linux-thread-multi/POSIX.pm
>> > line 1
> For this particular issue I found that Net::Ident is involved. As far as
> spamassassin goes it appears Net::Ident is only needed if you if you
plan to
> use the --auth-ident option to spamd. On my Debian system I removed it
with
> 'apt-get remove libnet-ident-perl'. I couldn't say if you hav
Andy Balaam wrote:
> [9398] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O /etc/spamassassin/bayes_toks
> [9398] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
> /etc/spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Permission denied
> [9398] dbg: bayes: untie-ing DB file toks
> [9398] dbg: bayes: not scoring message, returni
At 02:52 PM Monday, 1/8/2007, decoder wrote -=>
Ed Kasky wrote:
> I just upgraded to 3.5.1 and it seemed that everything was working
> until I tried using sa-learn on a few messages. Running
> "spamassassin -D --lint" produces the following errors:
>
> [22986] dbg: plugin: fixed relative path:
>
Is there anything in SA that can trap these messages?
If is_charset_ok_for_locales isn't going to catch this what is?
SUBJECT_EXCESS_BASE64 etc won't work because they only look at
whether it needs to be based64 encoded or not.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?windows-1251?B?wPLo6u7iY
It's probably because I need sleep, but I'm confused on this scenario:
User emails from his/her dialup IP directly to trusted_networks server 1
(which is allowed by access not SMTPAUTH), which then goes to my server.
It seems this email gets flagged as DUL, PBL, etc...
user1 -> trusted_networks s
Rob Mangiafico wrote:
It's probably because I need sleep, but I'm confused on this scenario:
User emails from his/her dialup IP directly to trusted_networks server 1
(which is allowed by access not SMTPAUTH), which then goes to my server.
It seems this email gets flagged as DUL, PBL, etc...
use
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> > User emails from his/her dialup IP directly to trusted_networks server 1
> > (which is allowed by access not SMTPAUTH), which then goes to my server.
> > It seems this email gets flagged as DUL, PBL, etc...
> >
> > user1 -> trusted_networks server
Rob Mangiafico wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
User emails from his/her dialup IP directly to trusted_networks server 1
(which is allowed by access not SMTPAUTH), which then goes to my server.
It seems this email gets flagged as DUL, PBL, etc...
user1 -> trusted_networks se
Hello Folk !
Sometimes I get BAYES_99=3.5 as result of the test, in a message coming
to me. This message is only sent to me and its contents is not SPAM.
How can I find exactly the reason on this erroneous marking ?
Claude
--
You will find the CA certificate and the CRL here:
http://www.unibw
Hello!
I have some serious problems on our mail server lately... I have just
upgraded to 3.1.7 and since then will often see the following error
appearing in maillog
Jan 9 01:46:05 server sendmail[2034]: l096i4pX002033: timeout waiting for
input from local during Draining Input
Thus, many many s
41 matches
Mail list logo
