> Here's the rules that I get hits for..
>
> Content analysis details: (18.8 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> --
> --
> 2.5 MISSING_HB_SEP Missing blank line between
> message h
Richard
This is one of James Grey's useful rules...
http://files.grayonline.id.au/
this one is the loca_rawbody.cf
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Gray, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 Mar
Hi there,
I'm currently about to customize a local (gentoo~) 3.1 installation to our
specific needs.
One of the first steps there was a special regex to catch our very own
Received: headers
To check if this works I modified some other SA code parts and enabled debug
out.
But here I had to rea
mouss wrote:
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
given what you posted, you sa seems to be ok. you now need to make sure
your sendmail is actually calling procmail. try putting an error in your
You can tell procmail to log its actions by adding the following to the
top of a procmailrc:
LOGFILE=
James
Again from James Grey's rules - local_body.cf
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Fairbrass
> Sent: 27 March 2006 15:00
> To: users@spamassassin.apach
Hi all,
Is it possible to use the SA 3.1.x rulesets (from
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/rules/) on SA 3.0.4? In other
words, simply downloading the .cf files from that URL and plonking them over
the top of the existing 3.0.4 rulesets? Would that cause any problems? The
advantag
Hi list,
after my upgrade to spamassassin version 3.1.0
and migrate the database from mySQL to PostgreSQL there are
coming up many errors in the postgres logfile all like this:
ERROR: operator does not exist: character = bytea
HINT: No operator matches the given name and argument type(s). You m
Hi Gary V,
Sorry for the delayed reply.
>A clue was given to you in a previous post:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-users&m=114269315700923&w=2
>But I am not getting the full picture. You said earlier that the bayes
files
>were in /var/amavis/.spamassassin yet you say you changed
Peter H. Lemieux wrote:
mouss wrote:
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
given what you posted, you sa seems to be ok. you now need to make
sure
your sendmail is actually calling procmail. try putting an error in
your
You can tell procmail to log its actions by adding the following to
the top
Ingo Freund wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> after my upgrade to spamassassin version 3.1.0
> and migrate the database from mySQL to PostgreSQL there are
> coming up many errors in the postgres logfile all like this:
>
> ERROR: operator does not exist: character = bytea
> HINT: No operator matches the giv
Michael Parker wrote:
> Ingo Freund wrote:
>
>>Hi list,
>>
>>after my upgrade to spamassassin version 3.1.0
>>and migrate the database from mySQL to PostgreSQL there are
>>coming up many errors in the postgres logfile all like this:
>>
>>ERROR: operator does not exist: character = bytea
>>HINT:
Ingo Freund wrote:
>
> The system worked well with mySQL.
WARNING: Bayes SQL does indeed work best with MySQL. Feel free to
search the users/dev list in the past for more information.
> Yes I followed the instructions.
> Migrating to Postgres went through without any problems.
>
> This is what
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 04:04:39PM +0200, Jeremy Fairbrass wrote:
> Is it possible to use the SA 3.1.x rulesets (from
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/rules/) on SA 3.0.4? In other
> words, simply downloading the .cf files from that URL and plonking them over
> the top of the exi
Michael Parker schrieb:
> Ingo Freund wrote:
>
>>The system worked well with mySQL.
>
>
> WARNING: Bayes SQL does indeed work best with MySQL. Feel free to
> search the users/dev list in the past for more information.
>
>
>>Yes I followed the instructions.
>>Migrating to Postgres went through
I have a one message I want to run through spam, How would I do this,
I don't want it to learn just test the message.
Thanks
Sorry to ask a question I *think* I've
seen the answer to, but should I not use SARE's antidrug.cf with SA 3.1.0?
I think I remember seeing something about that on this list.
Thanks!
Benjamin Adams wrote:
> I have a one message I want to run through spam, How would I do this, I
> don't want it to learn just test the message.
spamassassin -t
I've been reading archives from blogs, postgres mailing lists and here.
After some testing I do seem to get the best results from the
suggestions by Tom Lane. My scheme minus the GREATEST/LEAST [1] is the
same as the suggestions.
1) I'm not certain my sa_bayes scheme is error free (Should I
Hi
it's possible to add to my .cf spamassassin file a solution for tag all
email that :
The email address in "To:" are [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AND
The server sender are "192.168.10.250"
Thanks for your help,
Hi Gary V,
My bayes files are under "/var/amavis/.spamassassin" (sorry for the
typo)
$daemon_user = 'clamav'
$daemon_group = 'clamav'
clamav:x:1005:103::/var/amavis:/bin/sh
Thanks for clarifying, everything should be OK then. Then you should
create a cron job to run sa-learn --sync --for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Noc Phibee wrote:
> Hi
>
> it's possible to add to my .cf spamassassin file a solution for tag
> all email that :
> The email address in "To:" are [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> AND
> The server sender are "192.168.10.250"
>
>
>
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Sorry to ask a question I *think* I've seen the answer to, but should I
> not use SARE's antidrug.cf with SA 3.1.0? I think I remember seeing
> something about that on this list.
Antidrug.cf isn't SARE's, it's mine. (Not that I have anything against SARE, but
I've ne
Jeremy Fairbrass wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is it possible to use the SA 3.1.x rulesets (from
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/rules/) on SA 3.0.4?
No.
In other
> words, simply downloading the .cf files from that URL and plonking them over
> the top of the existing 3.0.4 rulesets?
No.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 01:07:03PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> So upgrade. You'll not only get the stronger rules, but you'll get the code
> improvements too.
Also, with 3.1.1, you can use sa-update and get new rules outside of
normal code releases. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"You probab
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 01:07:03PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
>> So upgrade. You'll not only get the stronger rules, but you'll get the code
>> improvements too.
>
> Also, with 3.1.1, you can use sa-update and get new rules outside of
> normal code releases. :)
>
I'd cat
Hi
We have a limited number of users on our system, but it currently
seems that each user can spawn 5 child processes.
My question is can I use the m(X) parameter in the
/home/user/.spamassassin/user_prefs file to limit the number each
user can spawn?
Thanks
Steve
--
--
Okay, thanks anyway for the advice! I'd upgrade in a flash but unfortunately
I'm not able to - I'm using MDaemon v8 which has SA bundled in such a way
that it can't be separately upgraded.
Cheers,
Jeremy
"Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Jeremy Fairb
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# cat procmail
ok... cat some file
procmail: [6329] Mon Mar 27 09:04:55 2006
procmail: Assigning "DROPPRIVS=yes"
procmail: Assuming identity of the recipient, VERBOSE=off
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 27 09:04:55 2006
Subject: $399
mouss wrote:
> Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# cat procmail
>
> ok... cat some file
>
>> procmail: [6329] Mon Mar 27 09:04:55 2006
>> procmail: Assigning "DROPPRIVS=yes"
>> procmail: Assuming identity of the recipient, VERBOSE=off
>> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar
First off, sorry if this comes out badly quoted, I'm using a web-gateway
since the thread has expired in my normal client and I wanted to reply.
Theo Van Dinter-2 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 08:18:35PM -0800, Dan Kohn wrote:
>> Anything else to try?
>
> Nothing comes to mind. It looks
Matt Kettler wrote:
mouss wrote:
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# cat procmail
ok... cat some file
procmail: [6329] Mon Mar 27 09:04:55 2006
procmail: Assigning "DROPPRIVS=yes"
procmail: Assuming identity of the recipient, VERBOSE=off
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon M
mouss wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
mouss wrote:
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# cat procmail
ok... cat some file
procmail: [6329] Mon Mar 27 09:04:55 2006
procmail: Assigning "DROPPRIVS=yes"
procmail: Assuming identity of the recipient, VERBOSE=off
From [EMAIL PRO
mouss wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>> mouss wrote:
>>> Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# cat procmail
>>> ok... cat some file
>>>
procmail: [6329] Mon Mar 27 09:04:55 2006
procmail: Assigning "DROPPRIVS=yes"
procmail: Assuming identity of the recipient,
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
Ah, sorry. I failed to mention what kind of server in my original post.
=) My bad.
we can keep this game going a long time.
my meaning was simply that people should make an effort to explain what
they are talking about. I too can ask why my SA doesn't obey my
C
mouss wrote:
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
Ah, sorry. I failed to mention what kind of server in my original
post. =) My bad.
we can keep this game going a long time.
my meaning was simply that people should make an effort to explain
what they are talking about. I too can ask why my SA does
Matt Kettler wrote:
It's not Linux centric, but it is to some degree *nix centric, but that will
happen with any perl tool.
Perl runs on lots of platforms, but is native to the *nix families. (ie: it
requires special porting to run on windows, and even that doesn't support the
whole perl languag
mouss a écrit :
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
Ah, sorry. I failed to mention what kind of server in my original
post. =) My bad.
we can keep this game going a long time.
my meaning was simply that people should make an effort to explain what
they are talking about. I too can ask why my SA
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
exactly what use I can make of it, but it
> proves that procmail is being used, no?
> So, I don't understand. Procmailrc is being used and calling spamassassin:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# cat /etc/procmailrc
> LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail
> VERBOSE=yes
> DROPPRIVS=yes
>
Matt Kettler wrote:
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
exactly what use I can make of it, but it
proves that procmail is being used, no?
So, I don't understand. Procmailrc is being used and calling spamassassin:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# cat /etc/procmailrc
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail
VER
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
> Is spamd running?
>
> A most excellent question! =)
> How do I find out?
ps -ax | grep spamd
(ignore any lines that contain "grep spamd")
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin status
> spamd is stopped
That works too
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at)
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
I guess the question for me to figure out now, is why did the service
stop running! =/
If that happens often, that would be a problem. but if it only happened
once, I don't think you should worry (This is less problematic than ntpd
exiting because the delta is
Noc Phibee wrote:
Hi
it's possible to add to my .cf spamassassin file a solution for tag all
email that :
The email address in "To:" are [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AND
The server sender are "192.168.10.250"
you mean add a header? no, you need to do this in your MTA or
Matt Kettler wrote:
Yeah, one thing to be aware of is that insertion seems to be the weak point of
the SQL mode. Even with the best settings SQL is slower than even DBM in phase
1, which is all learning.
I'm a little surprised at your result however.. Such a huge difference implies
that SQLite
mouss wrote:
>>
>
> how does the (sleepycat) berkely db compare here? is it just like dbm?
AFAIK, It Berkley db is the low-level database used by DBM.
I've found that SpamAssassin will not return a score until I close
socket writing. Once i've closed the writing, in order to get a score
for the next message, I have to reopen the connection in php to send
another message to SA. I hope I'm wrong about this, but currently I'm
bottle necking at becau
Kenneth Kim wrote:
> I've found that SpamAssassin will not return a score until I close
> socket writing. Once i've closed the writing, in order to get a score
> for the next message, I have to reopen the connection in php to send
> another message to SA. I hope I'm wrong about this, but currently
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
One of my usual users is getting hit again, and it's locking up the system
right now. I'm modifying the system procmailrc to get me copies of all
messages, so we can trace this down.
I'm absolutely convinced there's a certain type of spam doing
Before this download (using sa-update) my SpamAssassin
would cleanly pass a Lint, but after today's download
it gives:
SA 3.1.1 --lint:
[27192] warn: Use of uninitialized value in sprintf at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Pyzor.pm line 279.
[27192] warn: Use of uninitializ
Hello everyone,
first of all, the setup: debian/sarge, amavisd-new, spamassassin
3.0.3, clamav-daemon, postfix. The server is a relay only, no mail is
delivered
locally, everything is sent to a "real" mail server.
I have trained bayes with some 500 to 600 spams and about 300 ha
Sipos Gabor a écrit :
Hello everyone,
first of all, the setup: debian/sarge, amavisd-new, spamassassin
3.0.3, clamav-daemon, postfix. The server is a relay only, no mail is
delivered
locally, everything is sent to a "real" mail server.
I have trained bayes with some 500 to 600
50 matches
Mail list logo
